See the problem is that they suddenly lumped in the question of "did the shot cause the heart issue or was it coincidence" with "Thailand is banning the shot."
They tied them together mainly so the fact checkers could say 'false' since they attached a fake story to a real question. That's a big red flag, since generally they only take this extra step if they REALLY want to say something is false but can't.
Thailand suing Pfizer / dropping the shots / etc. were not ever meant to be serious arguments, just distractions from the issue.
It will take years, probably decades, before any properly run studies are done. Expecting that at this point is crazy, the testable and provable evidence that would show exactly what caused her heart damage is a long way away from existing. I'd love to have it, but it doesn't exist and won't until the people who made these decisions are 'safe' from the repercussions. The media is complicit so they aren't investigating and censorship is increasingly rapidly against citizen journalists.
I have a high burden of proof and used to think just like you but over the last few years it is unrealistic to expect medical evidence of anything related to mRNA technology. It just doesn't exist, nobody is pursuing it and nobody is allowing anyone to post their findings regarding it. THAT is the scariest thing about these stories.
We know for a certainty that excess mortality is increasing around the world focused on the countries with high mRNA rates though so it isn't really a question about whether it is dangerous, we know it is. The question is whether this is the worse it gets or the tip of the iceberg.
They tied them together mainly so the fact checkers could say 'false' since they attached a fake story to a real question.
FWIW, I heard it from people who were critical of the vaccine.
It will take years, probably decades, before any properly run studies are done.
If it doesn't happen soon, it will never happen. Because people will lose interest. I have barely even heard about corona for the past year.
I'd love to have it, but it doesn't exist and won't until the people who made these decisions are 'safe' from the repercussions.
Pfizer and Big Pharma are powerful, but I think a lot of people overestimate the amount of power that they actually have. They're not controlling all the bureaucracies in the world. Especially when there are those out there who are shilling competing products, like Russia, China, Cuba.
It's the old "if the moon landing were faked, the USSR would have pointed it out" argument.
I have a high burden of proof and used to think just like you but over the last few years it is unrealistic to expect medical evidence of anything related to mRNA technology. It just doesn't exist, nobody is pursuing it and nobody is allowing anyone to post their findings regarding it. THAT is the scariest thing about these stories.
There certainly are a lot of things that are questionable. For example, why did they push mRNA technology on the West? They said because they could easily make new vaccines for new variants, but we all know how they didn't for years. And countries that used traditional techniques came up with vaccines even faster.
I think the explanation is more mundane than anything: this was a golden opportunity to use people's panics as a way to get them to use mRNA when people normally wouldn't.
We know for a certainty that excess mortality is increasing around the world focused on the countries with high mRNA rates though so it isn't really a question about whether it is dangerous, we know it is. The question is whether this is the worse it gets or the tip of the iceberg.
I'm not at all certain that "we know" that. Nearly all Western countries used mRNA. So what valid country to compare it with is there? And is there evidence that countries with lower vaccine uptake did better?
Excess death numbers are not something countries can juke...too much. I don't trust any data the US puts out, so you can ignore them completely. Australia as well, Oceania and China don't even bother with. Totally inaccurate.
Israel's data is actually pretty good, or most of it. Germany produces accurate data as well, and their insurance industry is going apeshit trying to explain away the increase in deaths.
The excess deaths aren't just more elderly dying, it is excess across all age groups...that took the shot.
In continents like Africa the excess death figures are in line with most years, especially once you pull out the violent deaths.
US figures are so broken that basing anything on them is pointless. It's unbelievable data manipulation across an entire industry, largely because they flooded people with money for COVID deaths.
mRNA was an industry that was flooded with money and showed no success. All the Phase 3 trials failed but investors were anxious. Those investors included the NiH and US Government.
There is a good reason why the most dangerous mRNA shots were in the same batches. Given the production size that shouldn't have happened the way it did, VAERS gave us incredibly valuable data about which batches were causing the reactions because it showed us that depending on your batch number there was a statistically significant change in negative effects.
It is standard procedure in the experimental phase to test different formulas to try and pinpoint the safest. You just don't see it done on humans...at least not until recently.
You can also take a look at Pfizers new drug development, within the past few years they have started developing drugs specifically for the side effects of the mRNA shot, giving them a huge advantage compared to other companies who weren't aware that these medicines would be needed.
It is easy to be skeptical considering the lack of useful, physical evidence to validate many of these theories. So demand the information to test them, don't dismiss the theories. Everything I listed here is provable.
See the problem is that they suddenly lumped in the question of "did the shot cause the heart issue or was it coincidence" with "Thailand is banning the shot."
They tied them together mainly so the fact checkers could say 'false' since they attached a fake story to a real question. That's a big red flag, since generally they only take this extra step if they REALLY want to say something is false but can't.
Thailand suing Pfizer / dropping the shots / etc. were not ever meant to be serious arguments, just distractions from the issue.
It will take years, probably decades, before any properly run studies are done. Expecting that at this point is crazy, the testable and provable evidence that would show exactly what caused her heart damage is a long way away from existing. I'd love to have it, but it doesn't exist and won't until the people who made these decisions are 'safe' from the repercussions. The media is complicit so they aren't investigating and censorship is increasingly rapidly against citizen journalists.
I have a high burden of proof and used to think just like you but over the last few years it is unrealistic to expect medical evidence of anything related to mRNA technology. It just doesn't exist, nobody is pursuing it and nobody is allowing anyone to post their findings regarding it. THAT is the scariest thing about these stories.
We know for a certainty that excess mortality is increasing around the world focused on the countries with high mRNA rates though so it isn't really a question about whether it is dangerous, we know it is. The question is whether this is the worse it gets or the tip of the iceberg.
FWIW, I heard it from people who were critical of the vaccine.
If it doesn't happen soon, it will never happen. Because people will lose interest. I have barely even heard about corona for the past year.
Pfizer and Big Pharma are powerful, but I think a lot of people overestimate the amount of power that they actually have. They're not controlling all the bureaucracies in the world. Especially when there are those out there who are shilling competing products, like Russia, China, Cuba.
It's the old "if the moon landing were faked, the USSR would have pointed it out" argument.
There certainly are a lot of things that are questionable. For example, why did they push mRNA technology on the West? They said because they could easily make new vaccines for new variants, but we all know how they didn't for years. And countries that used traditional techniques came up with vaccines even faster.
I think the explanation is more mundane than anything: this was a golden opportunity to use people's panics as a way to get them to use mRNA when people normally wouldn't.
I'm not at all certain that "we know" that. Nearly all Western countries used mRNA. So what valid country to compare it with is there? And is there evidence that countries with lower vaccine uptake did better?
Excess death numbers are not something countries can juke...too much. I don't trust any data the US puts out, so you can ignore them completely. Australia as well, Oceania and China don't even bother with. Totally inaccurate.
Israel's data is actually pretty good, or most of it. Germany produces accurate data as well, and their insurance industry is going apeshit trying to explain away the increase in deaths.
The excess deaths aren't just more elderly dying, it is excess across all age groups...that took the shot.
In continents like Africa the excess death figures are in line with most years, especially once you pull out the violent deaths.
US figures are so broken that basing anything on them is pointless. It's unbelievable data manipulation across an entire industry, largely because they flooded people with money for COVID deaths.
mRNA was an industry that was flooded with money and showed no success. All the Phase 3 trials failed but investors were anxious. Those investors included the NiH and US Government.
There is a good reason why the most dangerous mRNA shots were in the same batches. Given the production size that shouldn't have happened the way it did, VAERS gave us incredibly valuable data about which batches were causing the reactions because it showed us that depending on your batch number there was a statistically significant change in negative effects.
It is standard procedure in the experimental phase to test different formulas to try and pinpoint the safest. You just don't see it done on humans...at least not until recently.
You can also take a look at Pfizers new drug development, within the past few years they have started developing drugs specifically for the side effects of the mRNA shot, giving them a huge advantage compared to other companies who weren't aware that these medicines would be needed.
It is easy to be skeptical considering the lack of useful, physical evidence to validate many of these theories. So demand the information to test them, don't dismiss the theories. Everything I listed here is provable.