FactCheck.org did a fact check claiming it to be false which essentially verifies it as true.
But yes, it happened immediately after the shot, she has no pre-existing conditions and what they are 'claiming' happened to her was rejected by physicians in Thailand, but this was all back in January.
Considering how intensely they buried the story and attacked anyone who suggested it was the shot I'd guarantee it was.
We won't get any evidence unti the autopsy and somehow I think the royal family will get a fat check to not have one done.
Does this mean that the Kansas School Sports Act does require genital inspections.
But yes, it happened immediately after the shot, she has no pre-existing conditions and what they are 'claiming' happened to her was rejected by physicians in Thailand, but this was all back in January.
It was all denied, most of all claims that Thailand was suing Pfizer or putting a stop to it, or whatever people fantasized. It's certainly not impossible that something happened due to a vaccine, but you need more evidence than a post hoc. Particularly when a lot of nonsense (some about people who died years before the vaccine) is spread with claims of "DIED SUDDENLY".
Considering how intensely they buried the story and attacked anyone who suggested it was the shot I'd guarantee it was.
Do you suppose they would attack people any less intensely if it weren't the vaccine? This all seems to be a whole lot of wishful thinking. Like the elaborate fantasy that is the present thread.
We won't get any evidence unti the autopsy and somehow I think the royal family will get a fat check to not have one done.
And even if one were done, people would just claim that the autopsy doctor was bribed. Not that I have a lot of faith in autopsy doctors to begin with, see the George Floyd one who said that he'd have called it an overdose if he had died at home.
Don't get me wrong, while I am not anti-coronavirus vaccine, I'm sure that there's a whole lot of shenanigans going on regarding this vaccine. Like the text messages between Von der Leyen and Pfizer. But that is no reason to start believing stuff with no evidence.
See the problem is that they suddenly lumped in the question of "did the shot cause the heart issue or was it coincidence" with "Thailand is banning the shot."
They tied them together mainly so the fact checkers could say 'false' since they attached a fake story to a real question. That's a big red flag, since generally they only take this extra step if they REALLY want to say something is false but can't.
Thailand suing Pfizer / dropping the shots / etc. were not ever meant to be serious arguments, just distractions from the issue.
It will take years, probably decades, before any properly run studies are done. Expecting that at this point is crazy, the testable and provable evidence that would show exactly what caused her heart damage is a long way away from existing. I'd love to have it, but it doesn't exist and won't until the people who made these decisions are 'safe' from the repercussions. The media is complicit so they aren't investigating and censorship is increasingly rapidly against citizen journalists.
I have a high burden of proof and used to think just like you but over the last few years it is unrealistic to expect medical evidence of anything related to mRNA technology. It just doesn't exist, nobody is pursuing it and nobody is allowing anyone to post their findings regarding it. THAT is the scariest thing about these stories.
We know for a certainty that excess mortality is increasing around the world focused on the countries with high mRNA rates though so it isn't really a question about whether it is dangerous, we know it is. The question is whether this is the worse it gets or the tip of the iceberg.
They tied them together mainly so the fact checkers could say 'false' since they attached a fake story to a real question.
FWIW, I heard it from people who were critical of the vaccine.
It will take years, probably decades, before any properly run studies are done.
If it doesn't happen soon, it will never happen. Because people will lose interest. I have barely even heard about corona for the past year.
I'd love to have it, but it doesn't exist and won't until the people who made these decisions are 'safe' from the repercussions.
Pfizer and Big Pharma are powerful, but I think a lot of people overestimate the amount of power that they actually have. They're not controlling all the bureaucracies in the world. Especially when there are those out there who are shilling competing products, like Russia, China, Cuba.
It's the old "if the moon landing were faked, the USSR would have pointed it out" argument.
I have a high burden of proof and used to think just like you but over the last few years it is unrealistic to expect medical evidence of anything related to mRNA technology. It just doesn't exist, nobody is pursuing it and nobody is allowing anyone to post their findings regarding it. THAT is the scariest thing about these stories.
There certainly are a lot of things that are questionable. For example, why did they push mRNA technology on the West? They said because they could easily make new vaccines for new variants, but we all know how they didn't for years. And countries that used traditional techniques came up with vaccines even faster.
I think the explanation is more mundane than anything: this was a golden opportunity to use people's panics as a way to get them to use mRNA when people normally wouldn't.
We know for a certainty that excess mortality is increasing around the world focused on the countries with high mRNA rates though so it isn't really a question about whether it is dangerous, we know it is. The question is whether this is the worse it gets or the tip of the iceberg.
I'm not at all certain that "we know" that. Nearly all Western countries used mRNA. So what valid country to compare it with is there? And is there evidence that countries with lower vaccine uptake did better?
Did any actual proof ever surface for that Thailand thing?
FactCheck.org did a fact check claiming it to be false which essentially verifies it as true.
But yes, it happened immediately after the shot, she has no pre-existing conditions and what they are 'claiming' happened to her was rejected by physicians in Thailand, but this was all back in January.
Considering how intensely they buried the story and attacked anyone who suggested it was the shot I'd guarantee it was.
We won't get any evidence unti the autopsy and somehow I think the royal family will get a fat check to not have one done.
I opened the very first item on FactCheck.org
Does this mean that the Kansas School Sports Act does require genital inspections.
It was all denied, most of all claims that Thailand was suing Pfizer or putting a stop to it, or whatever people fantasized. It's certainly not impossible that something happened due to a vaccine, but you need more evidence than a post hoc. Particularly when a lot of nonsense (some about people who died years before the vaccine) is spread with claims of "DIED SUDDENLY".
Do you suppose they would attack people any less intensely if it weren't the vaccine? This all seems to be a whole lot of wishful thinking. Like the elaborate fantasy that is the present thread.
And even if one were done, people would just claim that the autopsy doctor was bribed. Not that I have a lot of faith in autopsy doctors to begin with, see the George Floyd one who said that he'd have called it an overdose if he had died at home.
Don't get me wrong, while I am not anti-coronavirus vaccine, I'm sure that there's a whole lot of shenanigans going on regarding this vaccine. Like the text messages between Von der Leyen and Pfizer. But that is no reason to start believing stuff with no evidence.
See the problem is that they suddenly lumped in the question of "did the shot cause the heart issue or was it coincidence" with "Thailand is banning the shot."
They tied them together mainly so the fact checkers could say 'false' since they attached a fake story to a real question. That's a big red flag, since generally they only take this extra step if they REALLY want to say something is false but can't.
Thailand suing Pfizer / dropping the shots / etc. were not ever meant to be serious arguments, just distractions from the issue.
It will take years, probably decades, before any properly run studies are done. Expecting that at this point is crazy, the testable and provable evidence that would show exactly what caused her heart damage is a long way away from existing. I'd love to have it, but it doesn't exist and won't until the people who made these decisions are 'safe' from the repercussions. The media is complicit so they aren't investigating and censorship is increasingly rapidly against citizen journalists.
I have a high burden of proof and used to think just like you but over the last few years it is unrealistic to expect medical evidence of anything related to mRNA technology. It just doesn't exist, nobody is pursuing it and nobody is allowing anyone to post their findings regarding it. THAT is the scariest thing about these stories.
We know for a certainty that excess mortality is increasing around the world focused on the countries with high mRNA rates though so it isn't really a question about whether it is dangerous, we know it is. The question is whether this is the worse it gets or the tip of the iceberg.
FWIW, I heard it from people who were critical of the vaccine.
If it doesn't happen soon, it will never happen. Because people will lose interest. I have barely even heard about corona for the past year.
Pfizer and Big Pharma are powerful, but I think a lot of people overestimate the amount of power that they actually have. They're not controlling all the bureaucracies in the world. Especially when there are those out there who are shilling competing products, like Russia, China, Cuba.
It's the old "if the moon landing were faked, the USSR would have pointed it out" argument.
There certainly are a lot of things that are questionable. For example, why did they push mRNA technology on the West? They said because they could easily make new vaccines for new variants, but we all know how they didn't for years. And countries that used traditional techniques came up with vaccines even faster.
I think the explanation is more mundane than anything: this was a golden opportunity to use people's panics as a way to get them to use mRNA when people normally wouldn't.
I'm not at all certain that "we know" that. Nearly all Western countries used mRNA. So what valid country to compare it with is there? And is there evidence that countries with lower vaccine uptake did better?