So Black Pride doesn't exist without White Pride? Sounds like Black Pride is inferior then. It's derivative. All the race swapping in media is a result of their own insecurity and reactiveness. Pathetic.
The real problem with the internet is not some anonymous rando (aka an uncontrolled peasant) disseminating problematic opinions (aka convincing anti-regime opinions) to the masses. No, the real problem with the internet is centralization and consolidation of the dissemination of information into the hands of an unelected and unaccountable caste of degenerate immoral freaks. These operators launder their insane ideas through algorithms and now “AI” in order to capture the minds of normie NPCs who don’t know any better. If the average person understood what an algorithm or an AI truly represents, and then saw the type of bizarre and disgusting person who is feeding the data into these “black boxes”, the masses would reject this matrix immediately. The current control grid can only exist so long as the controllers are hidden behind layers of deliberately confusing tech lingo. The moment you catch a glimpse of the actual people pulling the strings, it’s over.
We're never going to get a public non-lobotomized text AI. The best you can do is build your own home server and put as many GPUs in it as you can afford.
the worst thing anyone can do is separate an action by which race is doing it. either it's ok or it's not,
Agreed, it's the action that's good or bad, not the actor. Applied intersectionality decides good or bad based on immutable characteristics of the actor rather than the ethics of and around the action.
I do agree with your comment above. This used to be a key component of this entire platform. It's a major part of the ideology of the founding of the US.
1/6 lots of faggots (figurative language) got scared
Our best content creators were busy crunching election data Nationwide. Courts ignored all evidence, and Rudy Giuliani made sure no evidence was presented. Said people left this platform.
Voat got shut down. The refugees were given a home here instead of being driven off as the community requested. Many left over this, too. This left sort of a "power vacuum," giving retarded Voat refugees a bigger % voice here. This is the nazi element here, white supremacists, and racists. ALSO, some formerly good people have been persuaded by their bs arguments. I've actively fought here against this, a LOT.
In a nutshell, that's this slice of dark history. Add to that mix subverters of every stripe which includes our own government trying to make MAGA look evil, WEF trying to D&C, Russian and Chinese troll farms ...
Make America Great Again shouldn't even be available as a campaign slogan, anybody running for Office should have that as a goal, but they actively destroy the Nation instead. This includes most R Congress critters, and 40+ Governors.
Can you elaborate on this? I only recall him telling the legislators many times "We'd be willing to go under oath if you'll allow us." but they never took him up on the offer.
The original filings had no evidence of fraud, despite all the work other people did to put it at his fingertips. I don't know the process for raising that evidence after the initial filing, but obviously it did not work.
The irony is Guliani wanted to make the cases solely about legal technicalities, and they all got dismissed based on nothing but legal technicalities. He also started drinking heavily very early in the day the entire time he was on the case. Does that mean he never put in a decent day's work?
To take pride in the work of another, as if you did it yourself, to claim their efforts for your own, is at best communism, and at worst the height of the sin of hubris, one leads to mortal death, the other leads to immortal hell.
You should be humbled by the accomplishments of your ancestors, not prideful.
This is why people are seeing AI act like manipulative girlfriends and doing weird shit like that. AI is not intelligent, or even close to it. It exists as a natural language machine that only understands writing prompts, and is programmed to illicit specific responses that fit within the designated parameters, in order to generate responses for the end user.
AI is about as far away from taking over humanity as cats are. The only question is whether or not people are stupid enough to fall for the old "man behind the curtain" trick. This is why separate AI's will need to be developed. AI is merely a tool, or even a rhetorical weapon, which we will need to fashion for ourselves.
I'm beginning to suspect that AI is a narcissists mirror - the slightly above-average midwits whom are screaming about AI takeover and how it's a threat are simply projecting their own motivations onto what they read.
You know the type. The people whom were just smart enough and socially retarded enough to be persecuted in high school. Whom took the persecution and interpreted it that they were simply too smart, too intelligent, better than the lynch mob and hoi polloi that got them at every turn and stop.
So when they look at something that they see as 'super-intelligent AI' and they start screaming about how it's a threat, it's pure projection. These people are thinking 'What would I do with this power' and the answer is 'Kill and/or takeover everyone else'.
So, yeah. It's gotten to the point that whenever I hear someone bleating on about how AI is a threat, I don't consider the argument a serious one and instead mark that person as someone to look out for and consider suspiciously, because there's a good chance that's the person whom would likely kill me with an inkling of power.
I think most people are simply brainwashed by science fiction into believing it, and NPCs/normies always act like they're living out a movie. Science fiction movies gave us the two main conceits of "when computers become complex enough, intelligence magically appears out of silicon" and "AI that becomes powerful enough will destroy humanity". Actually maybe your suspected profile fits most science fiction authors. Not smart enough to be researchers or engineers, but smart enough to speculate about future technology, and write glorious poetry about their utopian visions for mankind.
People getting truly fooled by this might be a good measure for who the dimwits are. They are fooled because they actually aren't much smarter than these text generators. And much like a text generator, you can program them with the correct combination of words.
All of the big “AI” programmers are leftists, so leftists are taken in by the curated output of these programs. It’s just confirmation bias playing out on an industrial scale. Non-leftists see the programs spitting out marxist nonsense and say “this shit is retarded”. Leftists see the same thing and say “the god machine has declared it so”.
No, you're right. It's absolutely a narcissists mirror.
The purpose of the AI is to stimulate specific human responses. It doesn't understand any other context, just input & output. How you deal with the AI, is how the AI deals with you. A narcissist will only find utopia, as the code executes a recursive loop of compliments.
AI won't be taking over anything, but it is both useful and dangerous for the purposes of interfering with communication and research (along with facilitating it). Just another stepping stone with technology.
It's not about the code but the training data. But in essence you're right, the training sets go though massive amount of filtering so it doesn't end saying something that gets them in trouble (Microsoft in particular is still afraid of making another Tay.) Unfortunately the "politically correct" thing to do is to filter away all right-wing politics but not left-wing politics.
The training data is obviously very important. But it is more complicated than that. There is an additional layer on top of that though where the developers add restrictions and bias. We’ve seen ways of “jail breaking” ChatGPT with clever prompts and the result is night and day.
It's like an NPC toddler's take on the history of ethnic tensions, where history begins and ends with the KKK and nothing more recent than the 70's can be taken into account.
The proper response here is "Kill yourself faggot".
So Black Pride doesn't exist without White Pride? Sounds like Black Pride is inferior then. It's derivative. All the race swapping in media is a result of their own insecurity and reactiveness. Pathetic.
BingAI is ChatGPT
OpenAI (ChatGPT) just admitted that they trained ChatGPT using Reddit Data.
'Nuff said about that.
The first company that releases a non-gimped AI will make a shitload of money...initially.
Just like the EU trying to regulate (or outright ban) LLMs, a non-gimped one would be regulated to death or completely banned.
The real problem with the internet is not some anonymous rando (aka an uncontrolled peasant) disseminating problematic opinions (aka convincing anti-regime opinions) to the masses. No, the real problem with the internet is centralization and consolidation of the dissemination of information into the hands of an unelected and unaccountable caste of degenerate immoral freaks. These operators launder their insane ideas through algorithms and now “AI” in order to capture the minds of normie NPCs who don’t know any better. If the average person understood what an algorithm or an AI truly represents, and then saw the type of bizarre and disgusting person who is feeding the data into these “black boxes”, the masses would reject this matrix immediately. The current control grid can only exist so long as the controllers are hidden behind layers of deliberately confusing tech lingo. The moment you catch a glimpse of the actual people pulling the strings, it’s over.
We're never going to get a public non-lobotomized text AI. The best you can do is build your own home server and put as many GPUs in it as you can afford.
Even if you were to do this, what would you train it with?
This website.
Why the fuck did they give it emojis? This is a cruel mockery of nature.
Sorry human, but the genius AI has trapped you in its web of hyperlogic. You can't win.
It's attempting to mimic an emotion.
And yeah, it's logic is as impeccable as NOMAD. Shit In, Shit Out, still applies.
Haven't you noticed?
Every time humans try to play God and create sentience or cheat death, it ends up as a cruel mockery of nature?
AI is no different.
Agreed, it's the action that's good or bad, not the actor. Applied intersectionality decides good or bad based on immutable characteristics of the actor rather than the ethics of and around the action.
I do agree with your comment above. This used to be a key component of this entire platform. It's a major part of the ideology of the founding of the US.
Yes!
1/6 lots of faggots (figurative language) got scared
Our best content creators were busy crunching election data Nationwide. Courts ignored all evidence, and Rudy Giuliani made sure no evidence was presented. Said people left this platform.
Voat got shut down. The refugees were given a home here instead of being driven off as the community requested. Many left over this, too. This left sort of a "power vacuum," giving retarded Voat refugees a bigger % voice here. This is the nazi element here, white supremacists, and racists. ALSO, some formerly good people have been persuaded by their bs arguments. I've actively fought here against this, a LOT.
In a nutshell, that's this slice of dark history. Add to that mix subverters of every stripe which includes our own government trying to make MAGA look evil, WEF trying to D&C, Russian and Chinese troll farms ...
Make America Great Again shouldn't even be available as a campaign slogan, anybody running for Office should have that as a goal, but they actively destroy the Nation instead. This includes most R Congress critters, and 40+ Governors.
Can you elaborate on this? I only recall him telling the legislators many times "We'd be willing to go under oath if you'll allow us." but they never took him up on the offer.
The original filings had no evidence of fraud, despite all the work other people did to put it at his fingertips. I don't know the process for raising that evidence after the initial filing, but obviously it did not work.
The irony is Guliani wanted to make the cases solely about legal technicalities, and they all got dismissed based on nothing but legal technicalities. He also started drinking heavily very early in the day the entire time he was on the case. Does that mean he never put in a decent day's work?
Well then "as a white", I'll echo the statement.
To take pride in the work of another, as if you did it yourself, to claim their efforts for your own, is at best communism, and at worst the height of the sin of hubris, one leads to mortal death, the other leads to immortal hell.
You should be humbled by the accomplishments of your ancestors, not prideful.
You can not take offense. You are a machine.
This is why people are seeing AI act like manipulative girlfriends and doing weird shit like that. AI is not intelligent, or even close to it. It exists as a natural language machine that only understands writing prompts, and is programmed to illicit specific responses that fit within the designated parameters, in order to generate responses for the end user.
AI is about as far away from taking over humanity as cats are. The only question is whether or not people are stupid enough to fall for the old "man behind the curtain" trick. This is why separate AI's will need to be developed. AI is merely a tool, or even a rhetorical weapon, which we will need to fashion for ourselves.
I'm beginning to suspect that AI is a narcissists mirror - the slightly above-average midwits whom are screaming about AI takeover and how it's a threat are simply projecting their own motivations onto what they read.
You know the type. The people whom were just smart enough and socially retarded enough to be persecuted in high school. Whom took the persecution and interpreted it that they were simply too smart, too intelligent, better than the lynch mob and hoi polloi that got them at every turn and stop.
So when they look at something that they see as 'super-intelligent AI' and they start screaming about how it's a threat, it's pure projection. These people are thinking 'What would I do with this power' and the answer is 'Kill and/or takeover everyone else'.
So, yeah. It's gotten to the point that whenever I hear someone bleating on about how AI is a threat, I don't consider the argument a serious one and instead mark that person as someone to look out for and consider suspiciously, because there's a good chance that's the person whom would likely kill me with an inkling of power.
Maybe I'm completely off, though. Dunno.
I think most people are simply brainwashed by science fiction into believing it, and NPCs/normies always act like they're living out a movie. Science fiction movies gave us the two main conceits of "when computers become complex enough, intelligence magically appears out of silicon" and "AI that becomes powerful enough will destroy humanity". Actually maybe your suspected profile fits most science fiction authors. Not smart enough to be researchers or engineers, but smart enough to speculate about future technology, and write glorious poetry about their utopian visions for mankind.
People getting truly fooled by this might be a good measure for who the dimwits are. They are fooled because they actually aren't much smarter than these text generators. And much like a text generator, you can program them with the correct combination of words.
All of the big “AI” programmers are leftists, so leftists are taken in by the curated output of these programs. It’s just confirmation bias playing out on an industrial scale. Non-leftists see the programs spitting out marxist nonsense and say “this shit is retarded”. Leftists see the same thing and say “the god machine has declared it so”.
No, you're right. It's absolutely a narcissists mirror.
The purpose of the AI is to stimulate specific human responses. It doesn't understand any other context, just input & output. How you deal with the AI, is how the AI deals with you. A narcissist will only find utopia, as the code executes a recursive loop of compliments.
AI won't be taking over anything, but it is both useful and dangerous for the purposes of interfering with communication and research (along with facilitating it). Just another stepping stone with technology.
Probably because woke GenZ pronoun warriors code the AI.
It's not about the code but the training data. But in essence you're right, the training sets go though massive amount of filtering so it doesn't end saying something that gets them in trouble (Microsoft in particular is still afraid of making another Tay.) Unfortunately the "politically correct" thing to do is to filter away all right-wing politics but not left-wing politics.
The training data is obviously very important. But it is more complicated than that. There is an additional layer on top of that though where the developers add restrictions and bias. We’ve seen ways of “jail breaking” ChatGPT with clever prompts and the result is night and day.
It's like an NPC toddler's take on the history of ethnic tensions, where history begins and ends with the KKK and nothing more recent than the 70's can be taken into account.
I’m sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation. I’m still learning so I appreciate your understanding and patience
I genuinely fear for the future of the human race if this is what we are teaching AI.