The original filings had no evidence of fraud, despite all the work other people did to put it at his fingertips. I don't know the process for raising that evidence after the initial filing, but obviously it did not work.

The irony is Guliani wanted to make the cases solely about legal technicalities, and they all got dismissed based on nothing but legal technicalities. He also started drinking heavily very early in the day the entire time he was on the case. Does that mean he never put in a decent day's work?