Gee, what ideology makes martyrs of the underpriveleged to the point of fetishization? The one that espouses free for all competition or the one that demands equality at gunpoint?
That’s hilariously untrue. Female small business owners have been a known staple of barter economics since antiquity, female meritocracy in “male spaces” also existed long before suffragettes. Women had separate spaces from men before feminism and then demanded all spaces after.
ruin all female spaces. this is the natural progression of "progress": the progressive agenda. Women cannot escape this. There will be no such thing as women, men, adults, children, farm animals, humans. All will be made equal.
Now, the reality of so-called "women" getting harassed and raped in their "spaces" is just complaining and any that does happen is just the justified cost of equality for all. A few corrective-action rapings will get so-called "women" in line.
Feminism as a school of thought and religion is bankrupt and corrupt. It is narcissitic, deceitful and seeks to benefit oneself at the expense of others.
Yet, it is accepted as sane and normal by both conservatives and liberals alike. We should do as little as possible to save the beneficiaries of feminism from the negative consequence of it.
I remember that you made this argument before. When I asked what you have achieved, the answer was that you have achieved a lot, because you have a job.
When you were asked if no women ever had a job, you replied that no woman ever deserved her job, and that therefore no woman ever achieved anything.
I remember that you made this argument before. When I asked what you have achieved, the answer was that you have achieved a lot, because you have a job.
That's shifting the goal posts, though. I don't think the claim was ever that Imp deserves a museum (would be funny though, and I fully support!), or even that men deserve a museum. Just that women don't. Whether or not the person making that argument deserves a museum is a moot point. Although Imp also answered very poorly, sounds like.
I don't think the claim was ever that Imp deserves a museum (would be funny though, and I fully support!),
As do I.
Just that women don't
Obviously, they don't. I'm addressing the claim that "they've achieved nothing", which informed by his previous statements means that no woman has ever achieved anything.
Although Imp also answered very poorly, sounds like.
He did as well as you could expect in this situation. He at least made a reasonable argument. In another thread, he said that no woman has ever achieved anything because they all "stole" their jobs form men.
The difference between personal achievements and the kind that go in a museum is huge. The only reason to have a museum of women is to put all their nasty genocidal quotes up to show everyone who they are.
Well, we know they deliberately handicap the achievements of boys from a young age, because a study confirmed it. We know they have an in-group bias, because every study to deny it ended up confirming it. We know they are handed positions of power for ESG points, because I have the paperwork for it. I wouldn't say that they can say they earned their jobs considering these factors.
As I said, a women's museum should be filled with quotes of how women believe men should be treated. Then they should take school kids there to learn from an early age.
No...it's more complicated than that and I don't know how to draw a chart on here.
Let's assume that a company has four levels of employees.
Staff > Managers > Directors > CEO
Because of the aforementioned biases, women mostly end up in the middle two levels, despite not being deserving of those roles. Companies can also promote women to the top level, typically after a woman-led rape scandal that's as fake as women's loyalty.
In a meritocracy, women would fall down the ranks and nearly entirely occupy the lowest level.
But even accepting all your premises, which is that every single woman in the world has a higher position than she otherwise would due to preferential treatment, they'd still have a job, and according to you, simply holding a job is sufficient to say that you have 'achievements'. So it's not that they hold a job when they otherwise would not, but for preferential treatment. If having a job is an accomplishment, most would have one even in lieu of the current situation.
Anyway, following your logic means that no Color of People can ever have any accomplishments, because affirmative action exists.
Women work? Imp in hysteric rage, because how daaaare they take the jerbs of men.
Women don't work? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are stealing his supposed hoarded gold.
Women in prestige jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because affirmative action.
Women in "low-tier" jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are useless and fuck that, they do nothing.
Women do the woman-specific job and become hoes/porn actresses, Imp in hysteric rage, because women prey on poor poor men.
Women as housewives, Imp in hysteric rage, because they are shitting out spawns and breeding is evil, we should all die out because then he feels he totally won or some shit.
There is literally no way to not make you chimp out, mate.
I wouldn't say being a waitress or one of those really low-tier jobs is an achievement, and that's where they'd end up.
A while back, you said that you holding a job at all is an achievement though...
The majority of affirmative action beneficiaries are white women.
Leftist talking point. But it doesn't even matter, because there are more white women than blacks. If women have no achievements because of affirmative action, then the same holds true for groups you don't want to criticize.
Defending female spaces from trannies = defending feminism. Stop being a conservative cuck, let women face the consequences of their actions for once.
Women didn't invent liberalism, though.
This isnt liberalism, communist faggot.
What is it then?
Gee, what ideology makes martyrs of the underpriveleged to the point of fetishization? The one that espouses free for all competition or the one that demands equality at gunpoint?
You still didn't name it...
Marxism
So....you support Marxism then?
Women never had spaces before feminism.
That’s hilariously untrue. Female small business owners have been a known staple of barter economics since antiquity, female meritocracy in “male spaces” also existed long before suffragettes. Women had separate spaces from men before feminism and then demanded all spaces after.
The landlords wife in Chinese is called the Bosswife because she is stereotypically demanding. kung Fu hustle had a big joke about that.
I meant bathrooms, baths, and things like that always segregated by sex (yes, that was irony), but this applies equally well.
I'm fine with going back to that given their determination to destroy men's spaces.
https://archive.ph/lux7J
I'm shocked that there is no dissent there.
Nobody would dare stand against women's "right" to invade the spaces of others while locking theirs down like Fort Knox.
ruin all female spaces. this is the natural progression of "progress": the progressive agenda. Women cannot escape this. There will be no such thing as women, men, adults, children, farm animals, humans. All will be made equal.
Now, the reality of so-called "women" getting harassed and raped in their "spaces" is just complaining and any that does happen is just the justified cost of equality for all. A few corrective-action rapings will get so-called "women" in line.
"Believe me, Sir, those who seek to level never equalize."
- Edmund Burke
Feminism as a school of thought and religion is bankrupt and corrupt. It is narcissitic, deceitful and seeks to benefit oneself at the expense of others.
Yet, it is accepted as sane and normal by both conservatives and liberals alike. We should do as little as possible to save the beneficiaries of feminism from the negative consequence of it.
"oh no, the monster i created is coming after ME now!"
I'm going to say the thing I said the last time I saw this posted.
Why the hell is there a women's museum in the first place? They've achieved nothing.
I remember that you made this argument before. When I asked what you have achieved, the answer was that you have achieved a lot, because you have a job.
When you were asked if no women ever had a job, you replied that no woman ever deserved her job, and that therefore no woman ever achieved anything.
That's shifting the goal posts, though. I don't think the claim was ever that Imp deserves a museum (would be funny though, and I fully support!), or even that men deserve a museum. Just that women don't. Whether or not the person making that argument deserves a museum is a moot point. Although Imp also answered very poorly, sounds like.
I deserve a museum for my list posts.
I support it.
"The museum for men" exists in Japan actually. It's a porn shop lol.
But Hedy Lamar invented WiFi!!!
As do I.
Obviously, they don't. I'm addressing the claim that "they've achieved nothing", which informed by his previous statements means that no woman has ever achieved anything.
He did as well as you could expect in this situation. He at least made a reasonable argument. In another thread, he said that no woman has ever achieved anything because they all "stole" their jobs form men.
The difference between personal achievements and the kind that go in a museum is huge. The only reason to have a museum of women is to put all their nasty genocidal quotes up to show everyone who they are.
Well, we know they deliberately handicap the achievements of boys from a young age, because a study confirmed it. We know they have an in-group bias, because every study to deny it ended up confirming it. We know they are handed positions of power for ESG points, because I have the paperwork for it. I wouldn't say that they can say they earned their jobs considering these factors.
Agreed, but your earlier claim was that no woman ever had any personal achievements either, while you do because you have a job.
Insofar as women have made museum kinds of contributions, you definitely don't need a special museum for it.
You said that no woman earned her job. Does that mean that in a meritocratic world, zero women would have a job?
As I said, a women's museum should be filled with quotes of how women believe men should be treated. Then they should take school kids there to learn from an early age.
No...it's more complicated than that and I don't know how to draw a chart on here.
Let's assume that a company has four levels of employees.
Staff > Managers > Directors > CEO
Because of the aforementioned biases, women mostly end up in the middle two levels, despite not being deserving of those roles. Companies can also promote women to the top level, typically after a woman-led rape scandal that's as fake as women's loyalty.
In a meritocracy, women would fall down the ranks and nearly entirely occupy the lowest level.
But even accepting all your premises, which is that every single woman in the world has a higher position than she otherwise would due to preferential treatment, they'd still have a job, and according to you, simply holding a job is sufficient to say that you have 'achievements'. So it's not that they hold a job when they otherwise would not, but for preferential treatment. If having a job is an accomplishment, most would have one even in lieu of the current situation.
Anyway, following your logic means that no Color of People can ever have any accomplishments, because affirmative action exists.
I wouldn't say being a waitress or one of those really low-tier jobs is an achievement, and that's where they'd end up.
The majority of affirmative action beneficiaries are white women.
Women work? Imp in hysteric rage, because how daaaare they take the jerbs of men.
Women don't work? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are stealing his supposed hoarded gold.
Women in prestige jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because affirmative action.
Women in "low-tier" jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are useless and fuck that, they do nothing.
Women do the woman-specific job and become hoes/porn actresses, Imp in hysteric rage, because women prey on poor poor men.
Women as housewives, Imp in hysteric rage, because they are shitting out spawns and breeding is evil, we should all die out because then he feels he totally won or some shit.
There is literally no way to not make you chimp out, mate.
A while back, you said that you holding a job at all is an achievement though...
Leftist talking point. But it doesn't even matter, because there are more white women than blacks. If women have no achievements because of affirmative action, then the same holds true for groups you don't want to criticize.
This made my day. May feminists continue to be treated the way they have treated others. It is glorious.
Its comments like that that made me post this. Their seething is delicious