It's a turn of phrase. I think it's clear that the examples here are cherry picked, however the impact, based on my viewing, is highlighting how many (((whites))) are in here. People are likely to know these names. That's why they were picked. They may not know that they are jewish.
So let me get this straight - there is a group of 100 aliens (green skin, weird eyes, weird language), who push manage to push an agenda, and then there are 5 who are the most notorious pushers of that agenda... directed at humans. These 100 aliens aren't so convincing, but oh boy, these 5 people are really significant.
So you claim the 100 aliens are irrelevant and that these 5 are spearheading it?
But why is everybody in glass tanks fueling alien spaceships' propulsion then?
The claim that feminism is Jewish does not rest solely on a ratio of how many important feminists were Jewish themselves, although it is overwhelming if you take into account the population.
The most important thing is that the feminism comes from Jewish culture: a culture where women are cattle and in a conflictual relationship with men, due to the Jews not having the concept of love. It makes perfect sense for a Jewish woman to be a feminist, but this ideology is completely alien to European culture where a man and woman form a family based on love and mutual affection.
I did not state "all feminists are Jews" or even "all the most prominent feminists are Jews". I stated that feminism is Jewish. It's different.
I think our disconnect here is that you may be a liberal who considers an ideology as being the sum of individual contributions; for me on the other hand an ethnicity has a cultural character, and therefore certain ideologies and world outlooks can be assigned to (and therefore claim that they come from) the ethnicity as a whole.
You need to look at the culture of a people, not at the individual contributors. A list of non-Jewish feminists means very little, even because it could easily be that the vast majority on that list are either cryptojews or married to Jews or pupils to Jews. But even if the majority of feminists were not Jews, that would not disprove my statement because feminism still comes from and is part of Jewish culture and it's not part of the traditional European culture.
Your post is very reasonable. However, you need to consider that we're talking about a meme. A meme is a form of communication that is intrinsically snappy, hyperbolic, and due to its format it can only give you a little nugget of information. A redpill, if you will. Its purpose is to trigger curiosity and prompt the viewer to do further research.
The Jewish question is an extremely complex topic, that will take you through politics, history, philosophy, and religion. You cannot expect a single meme to convince you of even a small aspect of the Jewish question. To acquire true knowledge, you must read books.
I really want to emphasize this point. One is not going to be able to understand how the world works by looking at memes, or even having discussions in this forum. The true source of knowledge must come from reading books. The forum is useful to refine arguments, check understandings, and have directions on what to research next; but it cannot be sufficient. I can tell quickly if I'm talking to someone who has opinions formed by reading books or if I'm talking to someone who only has a superficial knowledge acquired in online forums.
So while what you are saying is correct in a literal sense, in practice I think you're being too harsh in judging a meme. You wouldn't expect to learn everything about a topic by reading e.g. a newspaper article, would you? The claim of the meme "every single aspect of feminism is Jewish" is correct; it just doesn't have enough space to completely argue the case. That's up to the viewer to do his homeworks.
And in case you're wondering, here's a good reading list to understand the Jewish Question.
For example, the full explanation of the claim "Jews have opened the floodgates to mass immigration" is in the book The Culture of Critique. I'm afraid you'll need to read the whole book to understand the justifications for that statement; I can't put the content of a whole book into a meme.
Mary Wollstonecraft, Emmeline Pankhurst, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, Sarah Moore Grimké, Angelina Grimké, Mary Ann M’Clintock, Paula Wright Davis, Lydia Maria Child, Frances Wright, Abby Kelly, Rebecca Latimer Felton, Ernestine Rose, Lucretia Coffin Mott, Adrienne Rich, Margaret Fuller, Maria W. Stewart, Lucy Stone, Marilyn French, Evelyn Reed, Alexandra Kollontai, Simone de Beauvoir, Virginia Woolf, Catharine MacKinnon, Valerie Solanas, Marilyn Frye, Juliet Mitchell, bell hooks, Kate Millett, Germaine Greer, Sally Miller Gearhart, Camille Paglia, Sheila Jeffreys, Luce Irigaray, Inessa Armand, Julia Kristeva, Mary Ann Evans, Rosi Braidotti, Donna Haraway, Ella Baker, Anita Hill, Patricia Hill Collins, Chandra Mohanty
The pattern you are trying to illustrate doesn't exist, and you are still a barely functional retard. Welcome back.
The only pattern is women. My list, which is far from comprehensive, includes WASP women, Catholics, blacks, Brits, French, Russians, New Zealanders, a Belgian and an Indian. As far as "Yankees" go, Rebecca Felton was the first female US Senator, and she was from Georgia. And I could compose another list, just as long, of influential feminist theorists, philosophers and activists of whom not one has any Jewish ancestry. The stormfaggots don't have a leg to stand on in this debate.
There are a lot of jews, but there are also a lot of non-jews.
It is like looking at one leg of a stool and saying "without THIS leg it would fall over!" and ignoring the other two legs. Technically correct but missing the bigger picture.
Maybe without the jews feminism wouldn't have the effect that it did. Even assuming (((they))) are behind the whole thing planning it out from secret satanic temples how far would they have gotten without the non-jews supporting them?
I think the memes are hilarious and piss off all of the right people but the global conspiracy thing seems like a much tougher sell.
jewish american culture is designed to make them feel like losers unless they are elite in some way.
on top of that jews are natural targets since they're an insular minority that tries to obtain supremacy over others, so they developed ideologies to divide society and try to get everyone to target everyone else so they don't target jews.
Yes, it's one of those low effort "Pan-Jewish conspiracy is the source of everything"
Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Honsetly, parts of it are, espeically the part where Blu Greenberg is known for bridging judaism and feminism, and yet feminism is already supposed to be jewish?
w/e, it's going to be removed for the obvious Rule 16 violation.
Ban Evasion (x3)
Actually, I this mirror account isn't the one we agreed he would keep to. The ban expired on this one, but IDK if he just forgot his password or what.
More like the certainty that anything even approaching a rational or facts-based conversation will be derailed by a bunch of fedposters whose entire reason for being here is to be as disruptive as possible.
Of course, they do that even when you don't bait them, so. . . .
This argument might hold weight, if it was anyone but Imp as the topic. Who will derail any and all possible discussions to rant about the Feminist NWO and how everything is only their fault and no other topic matters but that.
And if they do it regardless, then there is no point in censoring yourself to begin with.
Neither are most of the people who just notice things all on their own.
There is no difference between him and a JQ believer beyond the subject they believe in and him successfully having driven off any compatriots to rally with.
Have you considered the possibility that you draw a lot of ire from racialists specifically because, in your attempts to avoid them, you've de facto taken the other side?
I wouldn't accuse you of shielding Jewish feminists intentionally because you agree with them or support them, but it sounds like you've been doing it by omission, on purpose.
Not really. I'm pretty convinced that my hypothesis of them being against me because their main priority is white birth rates and exposing women harms that cause, is the correct answer.
Even if I did post about Jewish feminists - which I did, I referenced the Redstockings manifesto which is a sanitized (read : removed the Rule 2s) version of the SCUM Manifesto that I often quote, the fact is, they want triple brackets in the title and Jew in capital letters. They want the focus on the Jew, not the feminism.
OP got desperate though, Naomi Wolf as someone influential? She has no allies on the left and none on the right either. She alienated everyone. The idea of beauty standards oppressing women was a thing before she was even born.
Calling Dworkin influential is also a pretty big stretch. Most of the legal heavy lifting was done by Catherine McKinnon (Look her up sometime, she had a very, very powerful career.), and most of her movement arose from tradcuck retards elevating anyone would would help ban pornography.
Dworkin might have been the first feminist I heard about, but memory gets fuzzy 15 years back. She might not be a leader, but she was at one point the first fucked-up feminist that people began learning about. Putting her on the graphic makes sense.
careful what you wish for, rabbi. we wouldn't want the goyim to find the writings on how it's alright to rape three year olds, or how the romans wickedly killed tens of millions of jewish schoolchildren, or how jews should feel free to swindle non-jews, steal from them and keep their lost property, or how Jesus was a brick-worshipper who is now supposedly boiling in excrement in hell, or how if you shoot an arrow at a man and there is a doctor nearby, it's his fault for not going to get stitched up if he dies, so you're not a murderer...
The written foundations of feminism are overwhelmingly Jewish from the start over a century ago, to the present day.
Consider what a tiny minority Jewish people are, and then consider their massive overrpresentation in feminist activism.
Don't tell me 'it's not Jewish'. It would be like saying Warhammer isn't for neckbeard grognards.
It's a turn of phrase. I think it's clear that the examples here are cherry picked, however the impact, based on my viewing, is highlighting how many (((whites))) are in here. People are likely to know these names. That's why they were picked. They may not know that they are jewish.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This actually doesn't do that.
I still don't know what they think they're proving.
Disparity = Discrimination is what I think they are trying to go with.
Starting off with a lie, then.
Oy vey shut it down.
So let me get this straight - there is a group of 100 aliens (green skin, weird eyes, weird language), who push manage to push an agenda, and then there are 5 who are the most notorious pushers of that agenda... directed at humans. These 100 aliens aren't so convincing, but oh boy, these 5 people are really significant.
So you claim the 100 aliens are irrelevant and that these 5 are spearheading it?
But why is everybody in glass tanks fueling alien spaceships' propulsion then?
The claim that feminism is Jewish does not rest solely on a ratio of how many important feminists were Jewish themselves, although it is overwhelming if you take into account the population.
The most important thing is that the feminism comes from Jewish culture: a culture where women are cattle and in a conflictual relationship with men, due to the Jews not having the concept of love. It makes perfect sense for a Jewish woman to be a feminist, but this ideology is completely alien to European culture where a man and woman form a family based on love and mutual affection.
But it is entirely Jewish. It doesn't just have "strong Jewish influences". It is Jewish.
I did not state "all feminists are Jews" or even "all the most prominent feminists are Jews". I stated that feminism is Jewish. It's different.
I think our disconnect here is that you may be a liberal who considers an ideology as being the sum of individual contributions; for me on the other hand an ethnicity has a cultural character, and therefore certain ideologies and world outlooks can be assigned to (and therefore claim that they come from) the ethnicity as a whole.
You need to look at the culture of a people, not at the individual contributors. A list of non-Jewish feminists means very little, even because it could easily be that the vast majority on that list are either cryptojews or married to Jews or pupils to Jews. But even if the majority of feminists were not Jews, that would not disprove my statement because feminism still comes from and is part of Jewish culture and it's not part of the traditional European culture.
Your post is very reasonable. However, you need to consider that we're talking about a meme. A meme is a form of communication that is intrinsically snappy, hyperbolic, and due to its format it can only give you a little nugget of information. A redpill, if you will. Its purpose is to trigger curiosity and prompt the viewer to do further research.
The Jewish question is an extremely complex topic, that will take you through politics, history, philosophy, and religion. You cannot expect a single meme to convince you of even a small aspect of the Jewish question. To acquire true knowledge, you must read books.
I really want to emphasize this point. One is not going to be able to understand how the world works by looking at memes, or even having discussions in this forum. The true source of knowledge must come from reading books. The forum is useful to refine arguments, check understandings, and have directions on what to research next; but it cannot be sufficient. I can tell quickly if I'm talking to someone who has opinions formed by reading books or if I'm talking to someone who only has a superficial knowledge acquired in online forums.
So while what you are saying is correct in a literal sense, in practice I think you're being too harsh in judging a meme. You wouldn't expect to learn everything about a topic by reading e.g. a newspaper article, would you? The claim of the meme "every single aspect of feminism is Jewish" is correct; it just doesn't have enough space to completely argue the case. That's up to the viewer to do his homeworks.
And in case you're wondering, here's a good reading list to understand the Jewish Question. For example, the full explanation of the claim "Jews have opened the floodgates to mass immigration" is in the book The Culture of Critique. I'm afraid you'll need to read the whole book to understand the justifications for that statement; I can't put the content of a whole book into a meme.
Mary Wollstonecraft, Emmeline Pankhurst, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, Sarah Moore Grimké, Angelina Grimké, Mary Ann M’Clintock, Paula Wright Davis, Lydia Maria Child, Frances Wright, Abby Kelly, Rebecca Latimer Felton, Ernestine Rose, Lucretia Coffin Mott, Adrienne Rich, Margaret Fuller, Maria W. Stewart, Lucy Stone, Marilyn French, Evelyn Reed, Alexandra Kollontai, Simone de Beauvoir, Virginia Woolf, Catharine MacKinnon, Valerie Solanas, Marilyn Frye, Juliet Mitchell, bell hooks, Kate Millett, Germaine Greer, Sally Miller Gearhart, Camille Paglia, Sheila Jeffreys, Luce Irigaray, Inessa Armand, Julia Kristeva, Mary Ann Evans, Rosi Braidotti, Donna Haraway, Ella Baker, Anita Hill, Patricia Hill Collins, Chandra Mohanty
The pattern you are trying to illustrate doesn't exist, and you are still a barely functional retard. Welcome back.
This is the exact reason why Imp hates “noticers” tbh, because the list you threw up exists
A better pattern would be Jews and Puritans/ Yankees.
The only pattern is women. My list, which is far from comprehensive, includes WASP women, Catholics, blacks, Brits, French, Russians, New Zealanders, a Belgian and an Indian. As far as "Yankees" go, Rebecca Felton was the first female US Senator, and she was from Georgia. And I could compose another list, just as long, of influential feminist theorists, philosophers and activists of whom not one has any Jewish ancestry. The stormfaggots don't have a leg to stand on in this debate.
Not even women is a pattern, because there's no shortage of male traitors.
These are the sort of faces I end up with when I customise my character in Bethesda games.
*feminist character walks into town
"You're a sneaky looking sort!"
There are a lot of jews, but there are also a lot of non-jews.
It is like looking at one leg of a stool and saying "without THIS leg it would fall over!" and ignoring the other two legs. Technically correct but missing the bigger picture.
Maybe without the jews feminism wouldn't have the effect that it did. Even assuming (((they))) are behind the whole thing planning it out from secret satanic temples how far would they have gotten without the non-jews supporting them?
I think the memes are hilarious and piss off all of the right people but the global conspiracy thing seems like a much tougher sell.
jewish american culture is designed to make them feel like losers unless they are elite in some way.
on top of that jews are natural targets since they're an insular minority that tries to obtain supremacy over others, so they developed ideologies to divide society and try to get everyone to target everyone else so they don't target jews.
So what?
You think all these cunts got together in a room and plotted the overthrow of the West?
Post Reported for:
Yes, it's one of those low effort "Pan-Jewish conspiracy is the source of everything"
Honsetly, parts of it are, espeically the part where Blu Greenberg is known for bridging judaism and feminism, and yet feminism is already supposed to be jewish?
w/e, it's going to be removed for the obvious Rule 16 violation.
Actually, I this mirror account isn't the one we agreed he would keep to. The ban expired on this one, but IDK if he just forgot his password or what.
We are yet to see for sure.
9 months away, and back with a bang.
Hardly any of the women I quote are here.
You should quote these cunts occasionally. None of them are what you or I would call "good" people.
But it'll summon people like OP.
Imagine being so devoted to a cause, but still being too scared of stormfags to act.
More like the certainty that anything even approaching a rational or facts-based conversation will be derailed by a bunch of fedposters whose entire reason for being here is to be as disruptive as possible.
Of course, they do that even when you don't bait them, so. . . .
You're literally describing Imp
This argument might hold weight, if it was anyone but Imp as the topic. Who will derail any and all possible discussions to rant about the Feminist NWO and how everything is only their fault and no other topic matters but that.
And if they do it regardless, then there is no point in censoring yourself to begin with.
The difference is that I'm pretty sure Imp is not a fed.
Neither are most of the people who just notice things all on their own.
There is no difference between him and a JQ believer beyond the subject they believe in and him successfully having driven off any compatriots to rally with.
Exactly. There are a few of them who will at least feign a debate, but a lot of them will just screech "oy vey" until they get banned.
Have you considered the possibility that you draw a lot of ire from racialists specifically because, in your attempts to avoid them, you've de facto taken the other side?
I wouldn't accuse you of shielding Jewish feminists intentionally because you agree with them or support them, but it sounds like you've been doing it by omission, on purpose.
Not really. I'm pretty convinced that my hypothesis of them being against me because their main priority is white birth rates and exposing women harms that cause, is the correct answer.
Even if I did post about Jewish feminists - which I did, I referenced the Redstockings manifesto which is a sanitized (read : removed the Rule 2s) version of the SCUM Manifesto that I often quote, the fact is, they want triple brackets in the title and Jew in capital letters. They want the focus on the Jew, not the feminism.
OP got desperate though, Naomi Wolf as someone influential? She has no allies on the left and none on the right either. She alienated everyone. The idea of beauty standards oppressing women was a thing before she was even born.
Calling Dworkin influential is also a pretty big stretch. Most of the legal heavy lifting was done by Catherine McKinnon (Look her up sometime, she had a very, very powerful career.), and most of her movement arose from tradcuck retards elevating anyone would would help ban pornography.
Dworkin might have been the first feminist I heard about, but memory gets fuzzy 15 years back. She might not be a leader, but she was at one point the first fucked-up feminist that people began learning about. Putting her on the graphic makes sense.
careful what you wish for, rabbi. we wouldn't want the goyim to find the writings on how it's alright to rape three year olds, or how the romans wickedly killed tens of millions of jewish schoolchildren, or how jews should feel free to swindle non-jews, steal from them and keep their lost property, or how Jesus was a brick-worshipper who is now supposedly boiling in excrement in hell, or how if you shoot an arrow at a man and there is a doctor nearby, it's his fault for not going to get stitched up if he dies, so you're not a murderer...
and that's just the stuff i could confirm myself. if you include all the things that the various (((organizations))) swear up and down aren't true but which every jew lives by anyway, the talmud and indeed all of jewish culture both paint a picture you really don't want people finding out.