More like the certainty that anything even approaching a rational or facts-based conversation will be derailed by a bunch of fedposters whose entire reason for being here is to be as disruptive as possible.
Of course, they do that even when you don't bait them, so. . . .
This argument might hold weight, if it was anyone but Imp as the topic. Who will derail any and all possible discussions to rant about the Feminist NWO and how everything is only their fault and no other topic matters but that.
And if they do it regardless, then there is no point in censoring yourself to begin with.
Have you considered the possibility that you draw a lot of ire from racialists specifically because, in your attempts to avoid them, you've de facto taken the other side?
I wouldn't accuse you of shielding Jewish feminists intentionally because you agree with them or support them, but it sounds like you've been doing it by omission, on purpose.
Not really. I'm pretty convinced that my hypothesis of them being against me because their main priority is white birth rates and exposing women harms that cause, is the correct answer.
Even if I did post about Jewish feminists - which I did, I referenced the Redstockings manifesto which is a sanitized (read : removed the Rule 2s) version of the SCUM Manifesto that I often quote, the fact is, they want triple brackets in the title and Jew in capital letters. They want the focus on the Jew, not the feminism.
OP got desperate though, Naomi Wolf as someone influential? She has no allies on the left and none on the right either. She alienated everyone. The idea of beauty standards oppressing women was a thing before she was even born.
Calling Dworkin influential is also a pretty big stretch. Most of the legal heavy lifting was done by Catherine McKinnon (Look her up sometime, she had a very, very powerful career.), and most of her movement arose from tradcuck retards elevating anyone would would help ban pornography.
Dworkin might have been the first feminist I heard about, but memory gets fuzzy 15 years back. She might not be a leader, but she was at one point the first fucked-up feminist that people began learning about. Putting her on the graphic makes sense.
You should quote these cunts occasionally. None of them are what you or I would call "good" people.
But it'll summon people like OP.
Imagine being so devoted to a cause, but still being too scared of stormfags to act.
More like the certainty that anything even approaching a rational or facts-based conversation will be derailed by a bunch of fedposters whose entire reason for being here is to be as disruptive as possible.
Of course, they do that even when you don't bait them, so. . . .
You're literally describing Imp
This argument might hold weight, if it was anyone but Imp as the topic. Who will derail any and all possible discussions to rant about the Feminist NWO and how everything is only their fault and no other topic matters but that.
And if they do it regardless, then there is no point in censoring yourself to begin with.
Exactly. There are a few of them who will at least feign a debate, but a lot of them will just screech "oy vey" until they get banned.
Have you considered the possibility that you draw a lot of ire from racialists specifically because, in your attempts to avoid them, you've de facto taken the other side?
I wouldn't accuse you of shielding Jewish feminists intentionally because you agree with them or support them, but it sounds like you've been doing it by omission, on purpose.
Not really. I'm pretty convinced that my hypothesis of them being against me because their main priority is white birth rates and exposing women harms that cause, is the correct answer.
Even if I did post about Jewish feminists - which I did, I referenced the Redstockings manifesto which is a sanitized (read : removed the Rule 2s) version of the SCUM Manifesto that I often quote, the fact is, they want triple brackets in the title and Jew in capital letters. They want the focus on the Jew, not the feminism.
OP got desperate though, Naomi Wolf as someone influential? She has no allies on the left and none on the right either. She alienated everyone. The idea of beauty standards oppressing women was a thing before she was even born.
Calling Dworkin influential is also a pretty big stretch. Most of the legal heavy lifting was done by Catherine McKinnon (Look her up sometime, she had a very, very powerful career.), and most of her movement arose from tradcuck retards elevating anyone would would help ban pornography.
Dworkin might have been the first feminist I heard about, but memory gets fuzzy 15 years back. She might not be a leader, but she was at one point the first fucked-up feminist that people began learning about. Putting her on the graphic makes sense.