Motivations matter. Rowling is the kind of commie lunatic who demands her right to free expression at the same time she demands you be silenced. Here she is reducing the complex issue of gender politics down to the simplest of Marxist terminology. She opposes trannification not because she's concerned for the welfare of children or committed to biological realism, but because she hates men and resents the idea that they can escape their staus as oppressors by choosing to become women.
Christopher Nolan did some interview shit about Dark Knight. A fan supposedly asked what would have happened regarding the Joker in 'Rises' had Heath not died. He said if he had, Joker wouldn't have survived Bane's takeover because being such a lioose cannon liability, Bane would have shot and killed him.
Imp is that level of loose cannon IRL. I wouldn't trust Imp not to sell my family out to save its own worthless life -- like certain prominent families did to their own people to get out of Europe during a certain war.
Imp goes against the wall post collapse, for being the same kind of liability, because with all of Imp's post, it's clearly that level of unhinged. Imp is little better than the troon that killed these children, just hasn't had the opportunity to prove it yet.
You're deranged, but you'll never be as deranged as Rowling the Marxist billionaire who got rich off a book about defeating the NatSoc Wizards, so you've got that going for you.
When you defend the placing of rapists in cells with women, you are handing the right a perfect opportunity to say, ‘You see, we told you the moral degeneracy that would result if you say homosexual relationships are okay.’ And I think for many leftists for many feminists, we are despairing of the fact that people are, in our view, colluding with a deeply misogynist movement which is benefiting, politically speaking, the far right."
He's calling troons deeply misogynist. And you are. I guess that upset you and now you're trying to incite the right by lying.
Honestly, I think feminists are worse than trannys for society. Trannys are such a tiny minority and can be easily dealt with. Feminism is a cancer that affects half the population if left unchecked.
It's so pathetic that she immediately goes to support the murderer despite being a so called "TERF". It's so clear that she is really only anti-MTF. The basis for that is not biological, not truth, not justice or reality or whatever conservatives fantasize about.
Women are the only group being asked to embrace members of their oppressor class unquestioningly with no caveat
You mean like every single (formerly) male oriented group in the last fifty years? I can't even remember the last time I saw a male oriented group that was actually made up of only men. Yet you can find female oriented groups literally everywhere that are comprised of 100% women.
Or the Christians in the western world, who are told by literally everyone around them to embrace Muslim invaders and sexual deviants who hate them, and if they dare to resist they are even jailed?
Or the White people who are told that they must live alongside a certain demographic who hates them and murders at a rate far out of proportion to their size?
No, I'm sure the most privileged entities to ever walk the earth are the real victims here.
But we should totally support her on the tranny issue guis.
Nah we should let them eat each other
She can be right on one thing and wrong on another.
Motivations matter. Rowling is the kind of commie lunatic who demands her right to free expression at the same time she demands you be silenced. Here she is reducing the complex issue of gender politics down to the simplest of Marxist terminology. She opposes trannification not because she's concerned for the welfare of children or committed to biological realism, but because she hates men and resents the idea that they can escape their staus as oppressors by choosing to become women.
Didn't you say that the vaccine, which you claimed had a 90% death rate, should be given to girls and not boys?
You want sex offenders to expose them to girls in locker rooms and showers?
So much for "defend the kids".
Yep. If I can give an analogy here...
Christopher Nolan did some interview shit about Dark Knight. A fan supposedly asked what would have happened regarding the Joker in 'Rises' had Heath not died. He said if he had, Joker wouldn't have survived Bane's takeover because being such a lioose cannon liability, Bane would have shot and killed him.
Imp is that level of loose cannon IRL. I wouldn't trust Imp not to sell my family out to save its own worthless life -- like certain prominent families did to their own people to get out of Europe during a certain war.
Imp goes against the wall post collapse, for being the same kind of liability, because with all of Imp's post, it's clearly that level of unhinged. Imp is little better than the troon that killed these children, just hasn't had the opportunity to prove it yet.
You can't even deny it, because your attempt at defending it yesterday made you look even worse.
You heard it folks, Wii Spa was not a thing.
You're deranged, but you'll never be as deranged as Rowling the Marxist billionaire who got rich off a book about defeating the NatSoc Wizards, so you've got that going for you.
Can you get anything right?
He's calling troons deeply misogynist. And you are. I guess that upset you and now you're trying to incite the right by lying.
The added qualifier, "unquestionably with no caveat" makes it even more absurd if that's possible.
I take it as her saying, "We have to submit to our oppressors, and we don't even get anything out of it."
Yet men don't oppress women
Exactly. The entire premise is false, but she takes it a step further.
Honestly, I think feminists are worse than trannys for society. Trannys are such a tiny minority and can be easily dealt with. Feminism is a cancer that affects half the population if left unchecked.
It's so pathetic that she immediately goes to support the murderer despite being a so called "TERF". It's so clear that she is really only anti-MTF. The basis for that is not biological, not truth, not justice or reality or whatever conservatives fantasize about.
It's the hatred of men.
Come again? Where are you getting that?
lol, you're such a lying piece of sh*t.
No, this interview is from a long time ago. It was only released after the shooting.
Here's where your screenshot is from
Yes, it was released on Tuesday. You think professionally done podcasts go up the day they were created? You absolute moron.
Wow, some woman in Scotland hasn't commented on something that happened on the other side of the world.
lol, there really is no limit to your crazy.
Let the Rad Fems and the TERFs fight.
Hopefully they take care of themselves and save us the trouble.
Neither side is your friend. They are two sides of a mass formation psychosis locked in a death struggle. Let them!
Woman immensely rewarded for childish fantasy is disconnected from the reality of humanity.
You mean like every single (formerly) male oriented group in the last fifty years? I can't even remember the last time I saw a male oriented group that was actually made up of only men. Yet you can find female oriented groups literally everywhere that are comprised of 100% women.
Or the Christians in the western world, who are told by literally everyone around them to embrace Muslim invaders and sexual deviants who hate them, and if they dare to resist they are even jailed?
Or the White people who are told that they must live alongside a certain demographic who hates them and murders at a rate far out of proportion to their size?
No, I'm sure the most privileged entities to ever walk the earth are the real victims here.
terfs gonna terf
I could name a few other groups that have to embrace oppressors...