In every test women have proven worse at every objectively measurable task than men.
With the trivial exceptions of endurance swimming which is I think tied and color differentiation at which women appear to be superior.
Yet we are forced by our poisonous culture to pretend to believe in the myth of equality under the threat of social, economic, and sometimes physical violence.
Women are better at keeping fat on them. I learned that from the TV show "Alone." They use more efficiently the calories they consume, particularly vs large men, and you just see them lose weight more slowly.
The idea that women are always superior to men is equally braindead as the idea that men are always superior to women, and both of these ideas fail for the same reason.
Applying a top-down one-size-fits-all ideal to literally the entire population removes agency from the individual, which is much more important.
There are women who can bench more than you, run faster and jump higher than you can, solve more complex puzzles than you can, design more efficient systems than you can, etc etc. The fact that there may be men that exist who surpass these women is irrelevant.
The Battle of the sexes is just stupid, and we would all do ourselves a favor if we just judged individuals by their individual merit.
Where did I say people shouldn't be judged as individuals? Where did I deny the existence of individual women who are better than me at individual tasks? Out of curiosity I looked it up and I would qualify as a top 5% in bench based on female standards: https://strengthlevel.com/strength-standards/bench-press and I'm pretty casual at working out. I acknowledge that I can't beat the female world bench record.
But when the marxists come and accuse anyone that isn't under their control of "discrimination" you need a counter narrative.
And that narrative is reality. The average woman is worse than the average man at pretty much everything. So the top % of anything will consist either almost entirely or 99% at least of men.
Bell curves exist. To make informed decisions when you are dealing with groups you have to take into account known group tendencies. Pretending they don't matter under penalty of social and economic violence means our society isn't in a good place.
Yet we are forced by our poisonous culture to pretend to believe in the myth of equality under the threat of social, economic, and sometimes physical violence.
looking back I suppose I misunderstood the intent. I wish to strive for equality on an individual basis, and not on a macro racial/sexual basis. It sounds like we are aligned on this.
The 19th century was 'degrading' to women, but women putting rings in their noses and prostituting themselves on OnlyFans are definitely not degrading themselves.
What you imagine is the captain of the cheerleaders 'simping' for you.
The correct analogy would be fat, unattractive girls with bad hygiene and bad breath 'simping' for you. And for that, you're putting your ass and dick all over the internet.
Not to mention that the average OF makes $10 or so for ruining her future.
I can figure out logically the kind of person who would be a simp.
And this is not even a simp. A simp is a guy who is whipped by an actual girlfriend, or at least a girl he knows. Not someone who showers some girl online with money to see her breasts.
Guys who are simps or egirls are raised on the internet and porn and are messed up. Logically, they should do a lot of things, but it's not happening. Men also try to turn themselves into women, which is illogical.
“We’re totally superior to men in every way. Yet they’ve managed to oppress us for forever.”
There’s “cognitive dissonance “ and then there’s “are you having a stroke?”
It's the exact same as Nation of Islam's origin myth of Yakub inventing white people in a lab to be the ultimate evil savage destroyers, unable to lead or cooperate or love or organize themselves, who somehow took over the world even with the prophets using laser beam death rays to blow up their enclaves.
When you're trying to dehumanize an enemy in order to encourage others to join you in your hate brigade, you need to stress that they're incredibly powerful and dangerous, but also incredibly weak to the slightest resistance at the same time.
i thought the origin of yakub was more indictment of the blacks than the whites. yakub invented whites because he was bullied by fellow blacks for being smart and big brained.
We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men, and if we were free and developed, healthy in body and mind, as we should be under natural conditions.
I wonder when this fantasy first started popping up. I suppose even back in the caveman days you'd have women saying this as they huddled around a fire while their man was outside freezing his ass off trying to hunt dinner.
Men lead. Women follow. That's a natural as it gets. We're far more physically capable. We're smarter. We're better able to handle the emotional toll that leadership takes on a person. Women can't beat us at anything besides long distance swimming. Literally that's it. We can do everything else better.
Well, one thing they're not superior at is mathematical logic, at least that particular one.
If she's infinitely superior, then any level of (dis)advantage that is weaker than a 100% reduction into nothing, is infinite. She could only have 0.00000000000001% the development level of a man, and if she was indeed infinitely superior, she would BE infinitely superior. But clearly, she is not, as if she were, her argument would convince men, which it doesn't.
Therefore, we can conclude that she is a liar, and discard her opinions.
We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men, and if we were free and developed, healthy in body and mind, as we should be under natural conditions, our motherhood would be our glory. That function gives women such wisdom and power as no male can possess.
Who remembers the sex-segregated survival island show?
She thinks women have a wisdom no man can possess, and maybe she's even right. But she doesn't stop to think that maybe there is an essentially male avenue of wisdom too.
At no point in human history did any nation arise that was run by women. The human female brain has never faced a selective pressure thay pushed them to secure and develop a territory for their safety and prosperity.
Its men's eons of instinct vs women's total lack of it.
The human female brain has never faced a selective pressure thay pushed them to secure and develop a territory for their safety and prosperity.
They outsourced that work to men, by seeking out and having children with the most powerful, most authoritative, most prestigious men they could manage to squeeze a drop out of.
I use to respect woman's politics out of courtesy until I sat down and listened to them, there's a reason why our ancestors refuse to allow women autonomy in public and governmental affairs. A normie's politics unstudied can be misguided, but a women's politics in all regards is disastrous and self-serving, you're better off taking advice from a retard.
When I see the elaborate study and ingenuity displayed by women in the pursuit of trifles, I feel no doubt of their capacity for the most herculean undertakings.
This right here is the actual root of all the other retardation they spew. They see how hard they work for minuscule nothings and assume that's how powerful they are in general. Which, anyone whose seen a woman trying to avoid work, effort, or responsibility knows they are capable of obscene levels of thought and cleverness.
But, obese people can do the same. As can a literal child. Neither of those are capable of accomplishing much in terms of actual real tasks. Their skills and brainpower (how disgusting they may be) can only be used in this specific arena, anywhere else and they are as useless as can be. Just like a woman attempting to run a household, or a government, or anything on their own.
In every test women have proven worse at every objectively measurable task than men.
With the trivial exceptions of endurance swimming which is I think tied and color differentiation at which women appear to be superior.
Yet we are forced by our poisonous culture to pretend to believe in the myth of equality under the threat of social, economic, and sometimes physical violence.
Women are better at keeping fat on them. I learned that from the TV show "Alone." They use more efficiently the calories they consume, particularly vs large men, and you just see them lose weight more slowly.
fat/energy burning is related to muscle mass, women aren't more efficient they just don't have much muscles beyond those required for movements.
The idea that women are always superior to men is equally braindead as the idea that men are always superior to women, and both of these ideas fail for the same reason.
Applying a top-down one-size-fits-all ideal to literally the entire population removes agency from the individual, which is much more important.
There are women who can bench more than you, run faster and jump higher than you can, solve more complex puzzles than you can, design more efficient systems than you can, etc etc. The fact that there may be men that exist who surpass these women is irrelevant.
The Battle of the sexes is just stupid, and we would all do ourselves a favor if we just judged individuals by their individual merit.
Where did I say people shouldn't be judged as individuals? Where did I deny the existence of individual women who are better than me at individual tasks? Out of curiosity I looked it up and I would qualify as a top 5% in bench based on female standards: https://strengthlevel.com/strength-standards/bench-press and I'm pretty casual at working out. I acknowledge that I can't beat the female world bench record.
But when the marxists come and accuse anyone that isn't under their control of "discrimination" you need a counter narrative.
And that narrative is reality. The average woman is worse than the average man at pretty much everything. So the top % of anything will consist either almost entirely or 99% at least of men.
Bell curves exist. To make informed decisions when you are dealing with groups you have to take into account known group tendencies. Pretending they don't matter under penalty of social and economic violence means our society isn't in a good place.
I was mostly responding to
looking back I suppose I misunderstood the intent. I wish to strive for equality on an individual basis, and not on a macro racial/sexual basis. It sounds like we are aligned on this.
The 19th century was 'degrading' to women, but women putting rings in their noses and prostituting themselves on OnlyFans are definitely not degrading themselves.
I mean if women simped for every dude that wagged his dick around on the internet, you'd see a lot of guys working them
I guess I'm saying I don't think men would feel degraded at all.
What you imagine is the captain of the cheerleaders 'simping' for you.
The correct analogy would be fat, unattractive girls with bad hygiene and bad breath 'simping' for you. And for that, you're putting your ass and dick all over the internet.
Not to mention that the average OF makes $10 or so for ruining her future.
Are you really watching the simps back to know what they look like?
LOL! Not gonna lie, that was a good one.
I can figure out logically the kind of person who would be a simp.
And this is not even a simp. A simp is a guy who is whipped by an actual girlfriend, or at least a girl he knows. Not someone who showers some girl online with money to see her breasts.
Guys who are simps or egirls are raised on the internet and porn and are messed up. Logically, they should do a lot of things, but it's not happening. Men also try to turn themselves into women, which is illogical.
Just saying, this is insulting to even simps.
Oh? Tell us more about what women think, Mr. Definitely Not A Woman.
You can't tell me what women think?
OK, and how do you know that?
Because you are one?
“We’re totally superior to men in every way. Yet they’ve managed to oppress us for forever.” There’s “cognitive dissonance “ and then there’s “are you having a stroke?”
It's the exact same as Nation of Islam's origin myth of Yakub inventing white people in a lab to be the ultimate evil savage destroyers, unable to lead or cooperate or love or organize themselves, who somehow took over the world even with the prophets using laser beam death rays to blow up their enclaves.
When you're trying to dehumanize an enemy in order to encourage others to join you in your hate brigade, you need to stress that they're incredibly powerful and dangerous, but also incredibly weak to the slightest resistance at the same time.
i thought the origin of yakub was more indictment of the blacks than the whites. yakub invented whites because he was bullied by fellow blacks for being smart and big brained.
they sound vaccinated
I wonder when this fantasy first started popping up. I suppose even back in the caveman days you'd have women saying this as they huddled around a fire while their man was outside freezing his ass off trying to hunt dinner.
Men lead. Women follow. That's a natural as it gets. We're far more physically capable. We're smarter. We're better able to handle the emotional toll that leadership takes on a person. Women can't beat us at anything besides long distance swimming. Literally that's it. We can do everything else better.
Well, one thing they're not superior at is mathematical logic, at least that particular one.
If she's infinitely superior, then any level of (dis)advantage that is weaker than a 100% reduction into nothing, is infinite. She could only have 0.00000000000001% the development level of a man, and if she was indeed infinitely superior, she would BE infinitely superior. But clearly, she is not, as if she were, her argument would convince men, which it doesn't.
Therefore, we can conclude that she is a liar, and discard her opinions.
Who remembers the sex-segregated survival island show?
She thinks women have a wisdom no man can possess, and maybe she's even right. But she doesn't stop to think that maybe there is an essentially male avenue of wisdom too.
At no point in human history did any nation arise that was run by women. The human female brain has never faced a selective pressure thay pushed them to secure and develop a territory for their safety and prosperity.
Its men's eons of instinct vs women's total lack of it.
They outsourced that work to men, by seeking out and having children with the most powerful, most authoritative, most prestigious men they could manage to squeeze a drop out of.
I use to respect woman's politics out of courtesy until I sat down and listened to them, there's a reason why our ancestors refuse to allow women autonomy in public and governmental affairs. A normie's politics unstudied can be misguided, but a women's politics in all regards is disastrous and self-serving, you're better off taking advice from a retard.
Feminists are free to leave and start their own society any time. Any time now.
This right here is the actual root of all the other retardation they spew. They see how hard they work for minuscule nothings and assume that's how powerful they are in general. Which, anyone whose seen a woman trying to avoid work, effort, or responsibility knows they are capable of obscene levels of thought and cleverness.
But, obese people can do the same. As can a literal child. Neither of those are capable of accomplishing much in terms of actual real tasks. Their skills and brainpower (how disgusting they may be) can only be used in this specific arena, anywhere else and they are as useless as can be. Just like a woman attempting to run a household, or a government, or anything on their own.