Well, one thing they're not superior at is mathematical logic, at least that particular one.
If she's infinitely superior, then any level of (dis)advantage that is weaker than a 100% reduction into nothing, is infinite. She could only have 0.00000000000001% the development level of a man, and if she was indeed infinitely superior, she would BE infinitely superior. But clearly, she is not, as if she were, her argument would convince men, which it doesn't.
Therefore, we can conclude that she is a liar, and discard her opinions.
Well, one thing they're not superior at is mathematical logic, at least that particular one.
If she's infinitely superior, then any level of (dis)advantage that is weaker than a 100% reduction into nothing, is infinite. She could only have 0.00000000000001% the development level of a man, and if she was indeed infinitely superior, she would BE infinitely superior. But clearly, she is not, as if she were, her argument would convince men, which it doesn't.
Therefore, we can conclude that she is a liar, and discard her opinions.