We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men, and if we were free and developed, healthy in body and mind, as we should be under natural conditions.
I wonder when this fantasy first started popping up. I suppose even back in the caveman days you'd have women saying this as they huddled around a fire while their man was outside freezing his ass off trying to hunt dinner.
Men lead. Women follow. That's a natural as it gets. We're far more physically capable. We're smarter. We're better able to handle the emotional toll that leadership takes on a person. Women can't beat us at anything besides long distance swimming. Literally that's it. We can do everything else better.
Well, one thing they're not superior at is mathematical logic, at least that particular one.
If she's infinitely superior, then any level of (dis)advantage that is weaker than a 100% reduction into nothing, is infinite. She could only have 0.00000000000001% the development level of a man, and if she was indeed infinitely superior, she would BE infinitely superior. But clearly, she is not, as if she were, her argument would convince men, which it doesn't.
Therefore, we can conclude that she is a liar, and discard her opinions.
I wonder when this fantasy first started popping up. I suppose even back in the caveman days you'd have women saying this as they huddled around a fire while their man was outside freezing his ass off trying to hunt dinner.
Men lead. Women follow. That's a natural as it gets. We're far more physically capable. We're smarter. We're better able to handle the emotional toll that leadership takes on a person. Women can't beat us at anything besides long distance swimming. Literally that's it. We can do everything else better.
Well, one thing they're not superior at is mathematical logic, at least that particular one.
If she's infinitely superior, then any level of (dis)advantage that is weaker than a 100% reduction into nothing, is infinite. She could only have 0.00000000000001% the development level of a man, and if she was indeed infinitely superior, she would BE infinitely superior. But clearly, she is not, as if she were, her argument would convince men, which it doesn't.
Therefore, we can conclude that she is a liar, and discard her opinions.