'Antivaxx' as a label for mRNA sceptics is intended to shame people into compliance, but sensibly it should reveal the fragility of the whole vaccination orthodoxy (which I never questioned before 2022). This talk suggests the west has been bullshitted by pharma shills for over a century on this front.
FDA and CDC bureaucrats will continue to push dangerous vaccines onto us if they can do so with ZERO cost to themselves.
If they see that people are now skeptical of all vaccines because of the MRNA 100% experimental shot - then now they have a cost. Now they lose something which they held dear. The public's compliance on all vaccines.
US citizens have a shorter life expectancy than of any developed country.
I think that part is pretty easily chalked up to how fat we are and the quality of the food available. I'd start pointing fingers there before even considering vaccines as a significant culprit.
There are a bunch of factors at play. Off the top of my head:
No other supposedly civilized country has a population of several dozen million niggers who keep killing each other.
No other supposedly civilized country has huge areas where you're more than an hour from the nearest hospital. When you get injured in the Netherlands, an ambulance can be at your location in 10 minutes. When you get injured in Bumfuck Nowhere, Kentucky, there's a good chance noone will find you till a week after you bleed to death.
Is there even any evidence that "benefits outweigh the risks"?
edit: Is there even any evidence that there are benefits??? The shots DON'T prevent infection, DON'T prevent you from transmitting it, is there really any proof of an ameliorating effect where someone goes into a hospital with covid and it would have been worse without the mRNA shot?
If you selectively limit observations to only infections and hospitalisation with a positive test for a period of 12 weeks, it seems like a good deal.
Except when you factor heart diseases, deaths, auto-immune disorders, etc, and keep observing longer to witness immunity fall in the negatives, plus the fact an injection after natural immunity from an infection destroys the superior natural immunity, it's a horrible mistake.
It would be pretty easy if you had a group of old people who took the vax and a control group to see which had more around 2 years later. I do not know if anyone has tried this.
Studies after studies produce results clearly showing kids and young adults as a group never benefited from the injections. Even the studies specifically about kids showing the injections did not improve kids lives and actually severely damaged their natural immunity come with the "but the benefits outweight the risks".
It’s much simpler than most of the comments here suggest. The benefits of the experimental therapeutic injections (aka “vaccinations”) must outweigh the risks because otherwise the public will turn violent against all of the liars and cowards who forced us to take those faulty injections for no good reason. Researchers and doctors aren’t going to paint targets on their own backs if they can help it, and there’s enough fog around all of this shit that everyone responsibly will almost certainly get away with it.
Presumably those claims are sourced in the respective articles, though I imagine that they largely cite the same studies (or, God forbid, they actually use the manufacturer's numbers).
The biggest problem with covid and vex studies now is that existing data is largely bullshit. The disease is apparently becoming responsible for every symptom under the sun, and nothing that the vexes do can be properly compared because of this 'varying' nature.
Presumably those claims are sourced in the respective articles
Often the article says nothing of the sort, and it's simply a throwaway line in the abstract or conclusion. Sometimes the evidence presented even shows the opposite to be true and they still add the line.
There's no risks to the companies making these "vaccines" thanks to legal immunity. That means that the companies making these shots have only benefits. Unfortunately for the idiots and cowards that took the shots, they're excluded from anything except all kinds of nasty side effects.
Because if you don't say that, you don't get published.
Or funded.
That’s funny, when the vaccines were first being pushed on people they said there were no risks.
The obvious lying and obvious cult around the pfizer clotshot is making me think about other vaccines for the first time. We know 3 things :
The CDC takes 'royalty payments' from pharma (other countries call that corruption).
The CDC recommends (and states mandate what the CDC recommends) the most 'vaccines' of any country.
US citizens have a shorter life expectancy than of any developed country.
'Antivaxx' as a label for mRNA sceptics is intended to shame people into compliance, but sensibly it should reveal the fragility of the whole vaccination orthodoxy (which I never questioned before 2022). This talk suggests the west has been bullshitted by pharma shills for over a century on this front.
FDA and CDC bureaucrats will continue to push dangerous vaccines onto us if they can do so with ZERO cost to themselves.
If they see that people are now skeptical of all vaccines because of the MRNA 100% experimental shot - then now they have a cost. Now they lose something which they held dear. The public's compliance on all vaccines.
I think that part is pretty easily chalked up to how fat we are and the quality of the food available. I'd start pointing fingers there before even considering vaccines as a significant culprit.
There are a bunch of factors at play. Off the top of my head:
Because it's a fucking cult.
Because it was never about the "science", it was about their religion
Is there even any evidence that "benefits outweigh the risks"?
edit: Is there even any evidence that there are benefits??? The shots DON'T prevent infection, DON'T prevent you from transmitting it, is there really any proof of an ameliorating effect where someone goes into a hospital with covid and it would have been worse without the mRNA shot?
If you selectively limit observations to only infections and hospitalisation with a positive test for a period of 12 weeks, it seems like a good deal.
Except when you factor heart diseases, deaths, auto-immune disorders, etc, and keep observing longer to witness immunity fall in the negatives, plus the fact an injection after natural immunity from an infection destroys the superior natural immunity, it's a horrible mistake.
It would be pretty easy if you had a group of old people who took the vax and a control group to see which had more around 2 years later. I do not know if anyone has tried this.
The CDC says it keeps old people out of the hospital 94%
If this study
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220519/Impact-of-COVID-19-second-booster-vaccine-on-all-cause-death-among-older-cohorts.aspx
is correct that was the kind of data I was looking for.
Yeah there's that problem though, the CDC can no longer be trusted.
Ok that was the data I could find
The second thing is exactly what I wanted because I wanted any-cause deaths
Same reason every publication regarding the 2020 election has to include the phrase "false claims about election fraud."
Because they're lying their ass off and are trying to push a narrative and reach critical mass via brainwashing normies.
Studies after studies produce results clearly showing kids and young adults as a group never benefited from the injections. Even the studies specifically about kids showing the injections did not improve kids lives and actually severely damaged their natural immunity come with the "but the benefits outweight the risks".
It's a "please don't excomunicate us" disclaimer.
It’s much simpler than most of the comments here suggest. The benefits of the experimental therapeutic injections (aka “vaccinations”) must outweigh the risks because otherwise the public will turn violent against all of the liars and cowards who forced us to take those faulty injections for no good reason. Researchers and doctors aren’t going to paint targets on their own backs if they can help it, and there’s enough fog around all of this shit that everyone responsibly will almost certainly get away with it.
Presumably those claims are sourced in the respective articles, though I imagine that they largely cite the same studies (or, God forbid, they actually use the manufacturer's numbers).
The biggest problem with covid and vex studies now is that existing data is largely bullshit. The disease is apparently becoming responsible for every symptom under the sun, and nothing that the vexes do can be properly compared because of this 'varying' nature.
Often the article says nothing of the sort, and it's simply a throwaway line in the abstract or conclusion. Sometimes the evidence presented even shows the opposite to be true and they still add the line.
There's no risks to the companies making these "vaccines" thanks to legal immunity. That means that the companies making these shots have only benefits. Unfortunately for the idiots and cowards that took the shots, they're excluded from anything except all kinds of nasty side effects.