Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

30
()
posted 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 +30 / -0
62 comments share
62 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (62)
sorted by:
▲ 27 ▼
– Ahaus667 27 points 3 years ago +27 / -0

We buy genetic material from young men and women. We allow other women to carry our genetic children. We’ve eliminated the need for sex to create a child. Are we eliminating the need for a uterus, too? Are we trying to eradicate the need for women?

Yes, yes we are, women are the largest cost in every western society.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– el_hoovy 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

it pains me how you cannot see that through your ridiculous misunderstandings of the world and its reality, and the resultant insanities you come up with, you actually end up validating women in their imaginary quest to eradicate you.

your view is illusions upon illusions and the still the best you can come up with is a strange mutual destruction stalemate where both you and your illusion of women deserve to die off.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 25 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 25 points 3 years ago +25 / -0

I unironically think it is both unethical AND fucking dangerous to do both this and the bone-marrow-fake-sperm, just like sperm donors and egg donors/surrogates are, but for a whole different reason, I suppose.

Making your children be engineered in any way by the same doctors who collectively fucked us over so many times and seem to have a twisted god delusion about themselves is not a smart decision.
It's also not ethical to have the elite (be it Hollywood homosexuals or executive political lesbians) be able to create designer children for themselves, meanwhile you are being told that if you marry another white person and have a kid, you are trash. Even just giving a deaf child medical help to hear is seen as "genocide", just like teaching a mildly autistic kid how to fit in a bit better.
But farming the perfect child that fits your Hamptons house's deck furniture is cool if you are a fag?

I also refuse the idea of lab grown meat, by the way. The normal, natural kind is demonised, but I am supposed to trust some other person (this one with a fancy diploma) to create a replacement for me?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 20 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

I explained why I do it, but please, just assume I am after you. Also, you are doing your autism again. You think degreed butchers would treat you and your test tube babies with care and respect, because you think a man who thinks he is god would treat you like a brother even though we have legit proof of the other, just so you can blow your hate load at me.

But please, claim I want you dead. You sound like hyperbolic, whiny woman. You are a feminist minded person. Same delusions, same hysteria.
You have the soul of a bitch, my friend.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

He's a female exclusionary liberal. Feminists are male exclusionary liberals, hence the similarity.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Kaarous 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Hello FBI? I'd like to report a murder.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Kaarous 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

You're not dead, certainly. Living? I'd argue no.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Sue me, mate. I'm sure the Lithuanian female assassins posing as Ukrainian refugee women will vouch for me.

Will you claim my intentionally comical word choice touched your nono place? Go ahead. I won't find it any less laughable than I find feminists claiming AC raeps them.

Yes. I am sure your manic episodes are all realistic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dzonatan 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I cant help but see a plot twist where future AI will take advantage of both those things to eradicate humans and breed only designer slaves.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 21 ▼
– Kaarous 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

Translation:. "Vile abominations against God are good if women don't like them!"

Oh, and of course it's Israel doing it. You won't ever put two and two together.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– anonymous570861 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Oh, and of course it's Israel doing it.

Because it is good for Jews. If tradtionalist Christians fall into the trap of thinking it is bad and ban it in their own countries, it will only be good for Jews.

Artificial wombs will lead the path forward back to patriarchal family structure by taking control away from women, who are increasingly brainwashed by Feminism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

"Buying your lab-grown baby from Pfizer is the key to restoring a patriarchal family structure."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Kaarous 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

No one here is suggesting that they be trusted at all. Hell, I openly advocate forcing most of them to confirm/behave and making public examples of the rest.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ailurus 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Artificial wombs will lead the path forward back to patriarchal family structure by taking control away from women, who are increasingly brainwashed by Feminism.

Wait, what? This probably wins the award for most insane post ever. Even if the technology works perfectly (which it won't), even if it isn't used for all sorts of crazy eugenics nonsense (which it will be), how will destroying families all together help improve family structures?

Oh, and the primary users of these artificial wombs? Probably 40-50 year old Karens who, upon realizing their actual wombs dried up (or who got them wrecked by having a pile of abortions) go to sperm bank (or pay some 20 year old simp for some of his sperm) and then use the artificial wombs to have the kid(s) their biological clocks are demanding they have. I'm sure a whole generation of kids raised that way will only help society!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– anonymous570861 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Even if the technology works perfectly (which it won't)

That is a fair criticism, and we will have to see what happens when artificial wombs hit the market. It will likely only be the rich to have this tech at first, so the people selling this tech will want the tech to be adequate enough for buyers to pay top dollar. And there should be improvements in the tech by the time the tech is affordable for the general public.

even if it isn't used for all sorts of crazy eugenics nonsense (which it will be)

Eugenics is good.

how will destroying families all together help improve family structures?

No one said anything about destorying families. While I don't think it should be common for single guys to start families by themselves, the mere option being there will improve the sexual & romantic market place significantly in men's favor. When you take away women's natural advantages, they have to offer more in relationship, men can afford to be more picky.

Artificial wombs is only one part. The other part will be artificial eggs and realistic sex robots. When single men have options other than women for having children and even the act of sex itself, women will have to step up their game in a relationship to compete. This is basic sexual economics.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

improve the sexual & romantic market place significantly in men's favor

Modern sexual and romantic market has little to do with family prospects.

When you take away women's natural advantages, they have to offer more in relationship, men can afford to be more picky

Men want to fuck hot women. Women want to fuck handsome, high status, high income men. Artificial wombs change none of that.

The other part will be artificial eggs and realistic sex robots.

Women having to compete with widespread pornography hasn't improved anything. The proliferation of porn tracks with relations between men and women becoming more fucked up, not less. Why would robots be any better?

When single men have options other than women for having children and even the act of sex itself, women will have to step up their game in a relationship to compete.

Again, we have history to draw on. Women eschewing motherhood and having to compete with porn haven't improved anything.

You also ignored the previous commenter's point about artificial wombs removing the biological clock issue for women. That is one of men's biggest edges in finding wives.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– anonymous570861 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Women having to compete with widespread pornography

Women have never had to compete with porn. Masterbation has never been competition to sex.

Men want to fuck hot women.

Men want to fuck women who are pretty enough, and men have higher sex drives than women. This is why even complete pigs of women get more attention on dating websites than average looking men.

Women want to fuck handsome, high status, high income men.

Women want to be wow'd more than they want to be fucked. Women have low sex drives. Money is one way of wow-ing women, and just as man's ideal woman is hot but he will settle for pretty enough, women tend to settle for guys with steady income that will spend money on them. Another way of wow-ing is having a good talk game, I have seen some ugly dudes pull women because their talk game was amazing, they didn't have alot money either (they also weren't tall, which women do like) and again, women will settle for a guy that just talks good enough.

Anyways, this is less about changing women's overall sexual habbits and more about changing women's overall relationship habbits. I would agrue it changes both but the former will be less than the latter, which will be most noticable.

You also ignored the previous commenter's point about artificial wombs removing the biological clock issue for women. That is one of men's biggest edges in finding wives.

If this gives men an edge, that edge is pretty dull but that is neither here or there.

Anyways women already have access to surrogates now but those surrogates are of course other women. So artificial wombs will give men some control in this area.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Sex robots are masturbation with extra steps.

If this gives men an edge, that edge is pretty dull but that is neither here or there.

The edge is dull because, as I said before, the romance/sex market doesn't revolve around family formation. Pfiser or whoever growing a baby in a lab isn't going to help that.

Anyways women already have access to surrogates now but those surrogates are of course other women.

Surrogates are crazy expensive. It's not something you order at a McDonald's drive thru. What power do you think they give women?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ailurus 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Eugenics is good.

You think restricting access to childbirth based on political affiliation (IE, "I'm sorry, you're registered as a Republican, therefore you can't use the wombs) is a good thing? Or restrictions based on DIE reasons (I'm sorry, all we can offer you is black kids today, we've had too many whites so far this year) is a good thing? And that would be easy to do today. Long-term, if people can figure out some form of basic engineering, I can easily imagine the government wanting to ensure that most kids are engineered to be nice, dull and easily compliant to ensure they are good little worker drones.

When single men have options other than women for having children and even the act of sex itself, women will have to step up their game in a relationship to compete. This is basic sexual economics.

You really think that's accurate? Really? In any type of basic economics, you have to offer the other party something they want. If there's realistic sex robots and artificial wombs, what else do you have to offer? Sperm? There's already sperm banks and spermjacking one simp should provide enough for a whole bunch of kids - and that's before artificial sperm comes around. Money? Uncle Sam will steal and/or print to take care of that, even if it's needed. What else do you have to offer?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Woman herself is an abomination.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 16 ▼
– Kaarous 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

Who invented sex change surgeries again?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

On people who were biologically defective.

What do you mean?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 11 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Would I trust our current 'leaders' with this tech, fuck no you know we'll get people bred to be slaves and some weird 'superior ones' as their offspring

But this tech would also destroy feminism at it's root, it's the most sharp of double edged swords.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

There is this idea that artificial wombs will destroy women's political power. It's not just Imp1 but many others in the sort of MGTOW/MRA/whatever scene who believe it. The logic is that women's power comes from motherhood so replacing it with this crude simulacra will remove women's power, but there is an obvious flaw in this reasoning. Women's power has increased as the birth rates collapsed - and collapsed precipitously. Why would this then take it away?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

The women being handed power are mostly low-birth rate liberals.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

No one is trying to "bring women to the negotiating table."

If it really was the work of "Chinese-aligned globalists"

WTF are you talking about?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Yes they are. That's why the lowering birth rates are followed by yet more bailouts for women.

What are you talking about?

The high birth rates are required to keep the Ponzi scheme that is the welfare state alive.

Births are required to keep any state going. Welfare has nothing to do with it.

I'm talking about how many on Patriots think the CCP controls their politicians and that's why birth rates are down

I'm not one of those people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 5 ▼
– realerfunction 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

android waifus when

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Are we trying to eradicate the need for women?

Give me one fucking reason why we shouldn't.

All-Male education. All-Male workforce. All-Male military.

The only thing better would be posthuman Godhood.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Tourgen 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

women require men to survive. men having any power over their own reproduction scares the shit out of women.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– el_hoovy 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

scientists in Israel

Give them more money.

oy vey, had a misstep there moshe...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy