improve the sexual & romantic market place significantly in men's favor
Modern sexual and romantic market has little to do with family prospects.
When you take away women's natural advantages, they have to offer more in relationship, men can afford to be more picky
Men want to fuck hot women. Women want to fuck handsome, high status, high income men. Artificial wombs change none of that.
The other part will be artificial eggs and realistic sex robots.
Women having to compete with widespread pornography hasn't improved anything. The proliferation of porn tracks with relations between men and women becoming more fucked up, not less. Why would robots be any better?
When single men have options other than women for having children and even the act of sex itself, women will have to step up their game in a relationship to compete.
Again, we have history to draw on. Women eschewing motherhood and having to compete with porn haven't improved anything.
You also ignored the previous commenter's point about artificial wombs removing the biological clock issue for women. That is one of men's biggest edges in finding wives.
Women having to compete with widespread pornography
Women have never had to compete with porn. Masterbation has never been competition to sex.
Men want to fuck hot women.
Men want to fuck women who are pretty enough, and men have higher sex drives than women. This is why even complete pigs of women get more attention on dating websites than average looking men.
Women want to fuck handsome, high status, high income men.
Women want to be wow'd more than they want to be fucked. Women have low sex drives. Money is one way of wow-ing women, and just as man's ideal woman is hot but he will settle for pretty enough, women tend to settle for guys with steady income that will spend money on them. Another way of wow-ing is having a good talk game, I have seen some ugly dudes pull women because their talk game was amazing, they didn't have alot money either (they also weren't tall, which women do like) and again, women will settle for a guy that just talks good enough.
Anyways, this is less about changing women's overall sexual habbits and more about changing women's overall relationship habbits. I would agrue it changes both but the former will be less than the latter, which will be most noticable.
You also ignored the previous commenter's point about artificial wombs removing the biological clock issue for women. That is one of men's biggest edges in finding wives.
If this gives men an edge, that edge is pretty dull but that is neither here or there.
Anyways women already have access to surrogates now but those surrogates are of course other women. So artificial wombs will give men some control in this area.
If this gives men an edge, that edge is pretty dull but that is neither here or there.
The edge is dull because, as I said before, the romance/sex market doesn't revolve around family formation. Pfiser or whoever growing a baby in a lab isn't going to help that.
Anyways women already have access to surrogates now but those surrogates are of course other women.
Surrogates are crazy expensive. It's not something you order at a McDonald's drive thru. What power do you think they give women?
Modern sexual and romantic market has little to do with family prospects.
Men want to fuck hot women. Women want to fuck handsome, high status, high income men. Artificial wombs change none of that.
Women having to compete with widespread pornography hasn't improved anything. The proliferation of porn tracks with relations between men and women becoming more fucked up, not less. Why would robots be any better?
Again, we have history to draw on. Women eschewing motherhood and having to compete with porn haven't improved anything.
You also ignored the previous commenter's point about artificial wombs removing the biological clock issue for women. That is one of men's biggest edges in finding wives.
Women have never had to compete with porn. Masterbation has never been competition to sex.
Men want to fuck women who are pretty enough, and men have higher sex drives than women. This is why even complete pigs of women get more attention on dating websites than average looking men.
Women want to be wow'd more than they want to be fucked. Women have low sex drives. Money is one way of wow-ing women, and just as man's ideal woman is hot but he will settle for pretty enough, women tend to settle for guys with steady income that will spend money on them. Another way of wow-ing is having a good talk game, I have seen some ugly dudes pull women because their talk game was amazing, they didn't have alot money either (they also weren't tall, which women do like) and again, women will settle for a guy that just talks good enough.
Anyways, this is less about changing women's overall sexual habbits and more about changing women's overall relationship habbits. I would agrue it changes both but the former will be less than the latter, which will be most noticable.
If this gives men an edge, that edge is pretty dull but that is neither here or there.
Anyways women already have access to surrogates now but those surrogates are of course other women. So artificial wombs will give men some control in this area.
Sex robots are masturbation with extra steps.
The edge is dull because, as I said before, the romance/sex market doesn't revolve around family formation. Pfiser or whoever growing a baby in a lab isn't going to help that.
Surrogates are crazy expensive. It's not something you order at a McDonald's drive thru. What power do you think they give women?