Which one would you choose and what would you do? (Other than kick out anyone who uses pronouns). Me personally I'm torn between two:
Sony: not so much for PlayStation (I'd just shut down and fire everyone at California HQ and remove all censorship, make 18+ material require a password to look at) but anime access, cutting off any American influence there and getting better rates for studios would be in the best interest.
Bethesda: would fire Todd Howard then force them to go to Id and get a better game engine.
Disney, force them to make 2D animation again and kick out all the CGI shit. Make em either give up star wars or actually hire someone who knows how to make adequate movies. Also decanonise the sequels and basically all Disney has released and pick up the extended universe again to make some actual good movies and series. I would probably wanna start with a movie series on Darth Bane since I was a sucker for his story and loved the books.
Also put KK where she belongs: toilet cleaner in one of the filthiest parts of Disneyland.
I always wondered, never fully explored the Star Wars extended universe, based on it's material, would it be better to base any future movies after Luke and the gang are gone or have it like Rogue one where it's focused on side characters around the same period?
You could also go back, Bane is before Luke. KOTOR is also a thing. No need to base all in the original trilogy time window.
True but I'm always concerned about retconning to be fully open to it.
And that's why you'll need someone at the helm who isn't a complete retard or out to destroy the fandom. For Darth Bane and KOTOR it was Drew Karpyshyn, actually a guy who worked on Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect, Mass Effect 1+2 as a writer. Think he should know his work best, no? It's possible to do this, just needs someone with the knowledge and also someone with passion behind it, good director but I wouldn't know who could do it personally.
The next star wars just starts with a middle aged Luke waking up from a terrible nightmare
Yea I remember after the sequels I was thinking wow, that’s the best they could come up with? They shouldn’t loosely adapted something in the extend we universe or at least continue stories in that timeline. Also Darth Bane would be cool
Agree, though I'd keep the cg shit as Pixar as it used to be.
Seems acceptable to me. I just miss those traditional animations or at least 2D. The worst is Disney SOLD their old equipment, they sold actual history instead of preserving it. I am still mad about this.
Google, obviously.
Return to early 2000's style unbiased search results.
Reinstate the 'don't be evil' motto.
No more google doodles for divisive woke shit.
Relocate company to texas.
Employees who exhibit woke ideology get fired.
Deny all Chinese censorship requests and guve zero fucks about getting shut out of their economy.
Google doodle of Xi as Winnie the Pooh.
First, you would be praised as a saint or a legend if you did that
Second, you will be taught necessary skills for when all the agencies come for you
Google can afford to hire Triple Canopy for some serious security
Buy Disney and make every female centered ip hyper masculine. Only display women as weak, dumb and conniving. See how women like watching everything they celebrated bastardized beyond recognition.
I have a feeling a not insignificant part of the female audience would love watching that.
Pocahontas would be fun.
They team up and battle another tribe.
Pretty much an exact mirror image of what they do. I like it.
But I wouldn't portray them as stupid. Then you get that whole false sense of security thing that got us here.
Nope, all media on the table including news networks
I just didn't touch them as it feels like their influence has been waning for years and if I made them tell the truth I'd need a PMC just to stop the CIA from disappearing me..
Any of the larger social media platforms. What would I do with it? Dissolve it.
Imagine if overnight Twitter just disappeared.
You have to:
That last part kills me a bit, but it's an imperative against the smart Leftists and criminals.
OUR Leftists don't know how to make things, but Leftists, even their Useful Idiots, absolutely have in the past. We're dealing with, effectively, Late Stage Leftism. As such, they have to occupy, colonize, steal, and vandalize anything they see as valuable, but Leftists in the past were very dedicated in building institutions that would generate their revolution.
Meritocracy, like Liberalism itself, is only possible in a society that is already morally ordered by some means. Whether it is organic or imposed, an already existent moral order is necessary.
We are dealing with institutions that are already aligned with power-mongering as their institutional value, run by resentment-mongers.
This is why, fundamentally, it is easier to just let all of these institutions fail and die, rather than seize them and change them. And if you do seize them, holy shit do you need to be forceful when you do. Don't be afraid to fire 50% of the institution on the day you walk in the door. You have to solve these problems, not with a hammer, nor a scalpel, but a god damned scythe.
It sucks, but once it becomes clear to the Leftists who remain that you aren't giving them a guarantee of money, power, or success, they will voluntarily deport themselves to a new hunting ground, and you'll be able to do the necessary work after they've left and don't show any resistance. In fact, some Useful Idiots are so seduced by power, you may find the bureaucrats turning to your side, simply because you are winning. When dealing with power-mongers, there is no greater virtue than being in charge.
I don't think this is as bad as you suggest; I think it's just very hard. If someone does not align with an organization's values and is promoted upward, they will eventually lead the organization off mission.
Say that you lead a group whose goal is to teach financial and economic literacy to teenagers, and you are looking to hire a teacher. You have two choices: a Nobel prize winning economist who is an excellent communicator and a bit of a Marxist, or some shlep who read Thomas Sowell's "Basic Economics" and understood only most of it. Which do you hire and promote? The economist is far more meritorious. But the shlep will do his job and ultimately further improve on the financial and economic literacy of your students.
Note I can only claim that last bit BECAUSE we reject Marxist ideas as valid. That is the hard part: picking your dogmas. Dogma is not the dirty word progressives suggest.
To be honest, it's dangerous one way or another.
If you only promote by value, you will be like the Left and lose merit.
If you only promote by merit, you will be subverted by the rare intelligent Leftist.
You have to have a delicate system of trust: meritocrats should be promoted to just under the level of incompetence and paid well. But culture and leadership must be built by those who espouse good culture and leadership.
With Bethesda I’d force them to focus on ES6 but I’d take over Disney, have legit kids entertainment and hire people for Star Wars and Marvel who actually understand it and aren’t activists. I’d also hire writers to continue stories in the old expanded universe
Does Blockbuster count? 🤔
Simply so I can say I own Blockbuster.
If you can afford to own any of the buildings left you can own Blockbuster, though I think you're paying more for the debt than the buildings themselves.
I'd be taking over NBC, CNN and Fox. We'll be running real history, real current events, and I'd probably get assassinated (I'm sorry, commit suicide).
Pornhub et al. I'd just shut it down. Make a video about how we harvested and destroyed all the storage drives and then sold off most of the server equipment. Keep the domains up with pictures of Jesus and links to rehabilitation materials.
Discord, and I would use all of the private chats troons set up and the unguarded messages they sent when they thought they were secure against them as ruthlessly as possible.
Assuming that I have complete control and my order have to be followed, and I can't be removed through physical force?
Disney or Alphabet. Arguably Alphabet would be the bigger one to topple, as I believe I could clean house almost overnight and gut the anti-Christian, anti-American measures and employees quickly.
Or as a meme answer, let me take over the US Government. It's basically a media company these days, really. Give me two terms of uncontested power and every command I issue being followed in both letter and spirit, and I think I could buy this country maybe another century or more before the corrupt commies start sneaking back in.
Warner Brothers Discovery. All openly left employees are cut, all openly left products are cut.
News is told through a strict neutral viewpoint. No editorializing, lie-by-omission etc. Stricter guidelines on what is reported nationally, state-wide and locally. Move away from 24/7 news. Harsher social media policies for employees ("Viewpoints aren't shared by my employer" isn't accepted. You shut the fuck up about politics or you find another company that'll let you mouth off at other users.).
Entertainment products focus on more original IPs, with established/ popular IP only used in specific circumstances (a stupid amount of money or the pitch has the potential to be a blockbuster hit).
Epic Games. Think about how much influence I could have with that limitless China money. I'd start cutting Unreal Engine access for woke companies.
Microsoft isn't really a media company, but that would be my second choice.
Or maybe I'd take over Liberty Media and stop the feminist coup currently in progress.
Ah, I finally figured out who you are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SzGJ-71yD0
I'd make Tim the trash man of the company and then I'd stop with the EGS and make em just focus on the Unreal Engine since it's the only good thing they've got going for them.
Are you sure? Legends say that when Valve counts to 3 the world ends, fire rains from the sky and cats and dogs live together..
If you can stomach VR and got the equipment Alyx is actually good...just not HL3 sadly.