Well, you know I love young girls... I'm just excited thinking about how fun it could be to play in bed with both of you!
“She's only 1 lol” That doesn't bother me & Never too young to start learning!
Kisses and touching all over. Kissing between your legs, especially! “o okie! that won't b icky tho?” Nope. As long as you wash first, it's not only not icky. it's an amazingly good feeling!
I hope you're ready to try plenty of new things! As long as you do exactly what I tell you, this should be a wonderful time for everyone
I'm really serious - this could get all of us in really big trouble if things go wrong! But I'm sure you can be good for me (splashing water signs)
Normally, I'd trot out my "don't persecute nor prosecute people for thought crime" spiel, but for fucks sake I'm not convinced he hasn't ALREADY molested a child.
Yeah, at the very least this troon has a stash of CP already. I can't imagine these people start out by trying to buy sex with 1 year olds. They only get there after CP pics and videos are no longer enough for them.
I want to type out the usual "there's a difference between a pedophile and a child molester; one has a mental disorder and the other is a criminal" thing, but I'm sure at least a dozen people with minimal reading ability will take that as defending this particular creep, so I'll abstain.
A poster here going around yelling "Women are universally evil! Someone needs to do something about it!" is thoughtcrime. He's (possibly) thinking of crimes, but there's no impetus, no action. It's a vague "someone" in question.
But the posts given, those are a call to action. Conspiracy to commit a crime is a crime in itself, and isn't thoughtcrime because it involves visible clear preparation steps to commit the crime. And those posts are grooming, they're clear preparation steps to commit a crime. Which makes them a crime.
It is important to be against thought-crime. But it is also important to know when something exceeds just thought.
Comment Approved: Advocating for a judicial execution (certainly for something reasonable and felonious) is acceptable. So if you advocate for the state sanctioned execution of someone after a trial, even by firing squad, for a crime like child rape (or baby rape), that's certainly well within reason.
Comment Approved: I'm choosing to see this as advocating for the judicial use of "death by hanging" as an official state punishment for felonious crimes.
Normally, I'd trot out my "don't persecute nor prosecute people for thought crime" spiel, but for fucks sake I'm not convinced he hasn't ALREADY molested a child.
Hans, get the flammenwerfer.
Yeah, at the very least this troon has a stash of CP already. I can't imagine these people start out by trying to buy sex with 1 year olds. They only get there after CP pics and videos are no longer enough for them.
No
Yes unless they're prepared to go live an isolated life in a monastery I will absolutely persecute pedophiles
I want to type out the usual "there's a difference between a pedophile and a child molester; one has a mental disorder and the other is a criminal" thing, but I'm sure at least a dozen people with minimal reading ability will take that as defending this particular creep, so I'll abstain.
Thought-crime is thought-crime.
This is an action. It is seeking something.
A poster here going around yelling "Women are universally evil! Someone needs to do something about it!" is thoughtcrime. He's (possibly) thinking of crimes, but there's no impetus, no action. It's a vague "someone" in question.
But the posts given, those are a call to action. Conspiracy to commit a crime is a crime in itself, and isn't thoughtcrime because it involves visible clear preparation steps to commit the crime. And those posts are grooming, they're clear preparation steps to commit a crime. Which makes them a crime.
It is important to be against thought-crime. But it is also important to know when something exceeds just thought.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Approved: Advocating for a judicial execution (certainly for something reasonable and felonious) is acceptable. So if you advocate for the state sanctioned execution of someone after a trial, even by firing squad, for a crime like child rape (or baby rape), that's certainly well within reason.
Surely we can find a little room for cruel and unusual punishment 1st?
And this is why we need to bring back the rope.
attached to a millstone, and thrown into the sea
You skipped beating them with a hose first
Telephone poles are more convenient.
Sounds unfair to the sea.
Don’t we already put enough trash in the oceans?
LionsTigersBearsBullet ants 🐜🐜🐜
I say we box up these twitter and TikTok pedos and ship them off to China, at least then they can be useful.
Or the executioner's axe
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Approved: I'm choosing to see this as advocating for the judicial use of "death by hanging" as an official state punishment for felonious crimes.
First time I got reported, badge of honor. And exactly as I said, I would never advocate for vigilante justice, doesn't Japan still hang people even?
Bro....