a) the people you're appealing to aren't going to vote for you
b) Some people (the ones using their brains) who were going to vote for you are going to be turned off by the fact that you think the KKK are a threat to anyone in this day and age
Auron Macintyre actually had a good point on this. By making this the message, it affirms the delusion that we're chock full of KKK members who are actively hunting black people. We absolutely can not fight using their language under their rule sets, the house always wins. We need to fight them outside of their insane entangled paradigm of lies.
No he didn't because he literally states it as a Democrat thing. You and whoever the fuck that is are retarded because it's metaphorical as well as literal. Or maybe I'm retarded because I believe the general public would actually get the point of the add
Some. Most Republicans just wanted (most) rights of citizenship for all men, rather than for some. If you look at what they passed, it's not exactly unreasonable. The only unreasonable thing is the speed with which they hoped to make major social transformations, and that was ultimately their downfall.
Before the Civil War, they were not self-righteous at all. Nor did they even interfere with slavery. All they wanted was to ban slavery in the territories, as they respected the rights of the South. Lincoln himself repeatedly warned against self-righteousness, telling his audiences that if they had been Southerners, they would not be keen to abolish slavery either.
They haven't changed that's for sure. They'd do that to Clarence Thomas today if they could.
They even wear their hoods again.
Did you notice the blue (D) marks on their robes?
Not until you mentioned it. I only noticed the donkeys.
Point being? My response is calling Antifa in the US and these other masking progressives for what they are.
Some fag in the comments posted a picture of Patriot Front and was like they're gonna get you so you're a chump for playing into their hands.
Even if that were true, that's all the more reason for this guy to have firearms.
You forgot the best part, he's running for office!
Damn it. We need more black politicians with a sense of humor to put dems out of business, not infighting.
Thank goodness! Redistricting, mebbe.
MY BASED NIGGERINO!!!!!!!!!
No this nigger is different. He's a political nigga, the kind that steals without violence.
MAN YOUR DOWNVOTE BUTTONS
This ad is retarded.
a) the people you're appealing to aren't going to vote for you
b) Some people (the ones using their brains) who were going to vote for you are going to be turned off by the fact that you think the KKK are a threat to anyone in this day and age
What they need is a black KKK, where black people dress in pointy black hoods.
"Mom, I want a black KKK."
"We have a black KKK at home, dear."
Black KKK at home:
DR3 is cringe, but the absurdity of this ad is still kinda funny.
Obviously, he doesn't think the KKK is a threat, he just want to rub it in that this is what Democrats did (and do to Supreme Court justices now).
Wow. Pretty funny
Oh man, I love it! 😄 Sadly the only rifle I have is a Hawken-style muzzle loader.
This is epic 😂
Auron Macintyre actually had a good point on this. By making this the message, it affirms the delusion that we're chock full of KKK members who are actively hunting black people. We absolutely can not fight using their language under their rule sets, the house always wins. We need to fight them outside of their insane entangled paradigm of lies.
No he didn't because he literally states it as a Democrat thing. You and whoever the fuck that is are retarded because it's metaphorical as well as literal. Or maybe I'm retarded because I believe the general public would actually get the point of the add
You really don't understand leftist strategy
Eh, the Republicans before and during the civil war were insufferable self righteous pricks so maybe there's something to it.
Some. Most Republicans just wanted (most) rights of citizenship for all men, rather than for some. If you look at what they passed, it's not exactly unreasonable. The only unreasonable thing is the speed with which they hoped to make major social transformations, and that was ultimately their downfall.
Before the Civil War, they were not self-righteous at all. Nor did they even interfere with slavery. All they wanted was to ban slavery in the territories, as they respected the rights of the South. Lincoln himself repeatedly warned against self-righteousness, telling his audiences that if they had been Southerners, they would not be keen to abolish slavery either.