Apparently Politico Actually Doesn’t Actually Expect Anyone To Read Past The Headline
(media.communities.win)
Comments (24)
sorted by:
They did use fetal cells from aborted babies in the covid vaccines development
And here's why that's a good thing...
Five reasons dead babies is good for the climate, and your labido!
Have you noticed articles geared towards liberals are starting to end with, "Here's why."
They know their audience is not reading past the headline and accepts whatever outrageous claim they make in the headlines.
They really hate Clarence Thomas.
But why him specifically? Why aren’t the other five justices who joined the majority opinion in Dobbs receiving nearly the same pile of shit?
Because the establishment absolutely fucking hates when black people disobey them. Blacks are supposed to be guaranteed votes and a weapon to terrorize white people with. When a black person decides to think for himself, it's a real danger, because he might inspire other blacks to think for themselves, and from there it's just a matter of time before black people stop being weaponized altogether.
I was actually surprised that Barrett did not get more flak on the abortion ruling. After all, they think they own women and blacks, but to call a black man a coon because he goes against you on abortion is rather strange. I'd expect that with affirmative action.
Because he's black. Saying the left are the real racists is actually true. The average left winger is by default as racist as a racist right winger. They are paternalistic and if you step out of line they come at you ferociously. I know from experience
Clarance Thomas, Thomas Sowell, and Larry Elder.
The 3 Musketeers of the Black Conservative movement that the Democrats and Black National Socialists consider uppity race traitors.
I mean, I'm pretty preferential to Young Rippa
If you ask me it's not what he's doing (threatening civil rights, as they'd put it) it's the fact that he's broken the unspoken rule and threatened the dominance of the elites. They're doing to him what they did to Trump.
Trump has his faults but he's not the establishment, and even if you disagree with that it's undeniable that he inspired a lot of anti-establishment sentiment. That's why they turned the full force of the propaganda hate machine against him. Now they're doing that with Clarence Thomas because he stepped out of line.
I will always be amazed how they couldn't make a deal with Trump.
They had his administration tied in establishment knots for so long a Republican Supermajority couldn't even make any headway on real tax reform or anti-gun control measures.
But the Saudis? They took one look at him, and knew he was one of them. When he went on his tour of the middle east, they rolled out the red carpet, had bands play for him, did parades, all sorts of silly shit because he was an arrogant strongman who wanted to improve his brand.
It worked so well, they assassinated a journalist and he still made a massive weapons deal to fuel a war in Yemen.
If the establishment had any fucking brains, and weren't so damned petty, they could have welcomed him into the club, got someone to suck his dick, do some basic sycophantic bullshit, and he would have been as completely cucked as Boris Johnson is.
BUT... they were just so selfish that they couldn't stand to let him into the clique. He was part of their clique in the 90's. They could have let him back in, but there was just too many hurt feelings to think strategically.
I object on religious grounds because according to Christianity my body is not my own so I have no right to clot it up.
Temple of the Holy Spirit.
If you're still a liberal, you are complicit. Ignorance is not an excuse.
FYI none of these shit news articles identify the case. It is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-1143_3f14.pdf
DR. A., ET AL. v. KATHY HOCHUL 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
All these asshole libs are lying, obviously. Here is the key text:
Thomas was not making a statement that vaccines were developed using cell lines derived from aborted children. He was merely stating what the Petitioner's argument was. Anyone who read this and wrote that headline knew they were deliberately and maliciously lying.
Not what the petitioners argued, or what Thomas said. This is called a "straw man" fallacy.
And thus, the truth of the statement is thereby admitted.
Roberts and Kavanaugh continue to disappoint. I hate how the libs are always in lock step, but the Right is all over the fucking place and routinely betray their own side.
The writer of the politico piece just straight up admitting that the headline is an outright lie, and trying to lampshade the truth as "some Thomas defenders". Oh? How about "anyone who isn't a liar"?
Most people won't.
They did, and people have a right to religiously object to it.
That was a conspiracy that could get you banned from every social media site about 8-10 months ago.