Apparently Politico Actually Doesn’t Actually Expect Anyone To Read Past The Headline
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
FYI none of these shit news articles identify the case. It is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-1143_3f14.pdf
DR. A., ET AL. v. KATHY HOCHUL 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
All these asshole libs are lying, obviously. Here is the key text:
Thomas was not making a statement that vaccines were developed using cell lines derived from aborted children. He was merely stating what the Petitioner's argument was. Anyone who read this and wrote that headline knew they were deliberately and maliciously lying.
Not what the petitioners argued, or what Thomas said. This is called a "straw man" fallacy.
And thus, the truth of the statement is thereby admitted.
Roberts and Kavanaugh continue to disappoint. I hate how the libs are always in lock step, but the Right is all over the fucking place and routinely betray their own side.
The writer of the politico piece just straight up admitting that the headline is an outright lie, and trying to lampshade the truth as "some Thomas defenders". Oh? How about "anyone who isn't a liar"?