Abortions are not mandatory medical procedures (at least none that Oklahoma bans); and you are mandating an elective procedure on all male children that is not actually all that reversible, regardless of a doctors suggestion.
We already know you support this because it allows for population control, and you demonstrated that you were prepared to mandate medical procedures without consent on children with your previous "vaccination" edicts. The fact that you want this to go through a legislature for the first timeis a fucking improvement from what you normally do. At least you fucking asked this time!
If you just announce that you are going to criminalize pre-marital sex, you'll actually get Christian support.
I said it above, but I think the real issue is that they're fucking retarded.
This is a lawmaker essentially trolling, and trying to make a comparison to the abortion "ban." But failing due to the aforementioned retardation. He's not saying he wants this (although he should still be immediately removed for attempted civil rights violations and, again, the retardation), but that in his fucked up mind this is the exact same thing the evil Repubs are trying to do to the whamen!
Well, that's literally true. Imagine any other mammal claiming to "have rights", and it becomes apparent how silly the idea of "human rights" are.
Either you can do something, or you can't do it. Then there may or may not be consequences. Other members of your species may react, or perhaps you've violated a physical law like gravity. In any case, there is no such thing as immunity from results or consequences of acting.
Also again: This is still just a recipe for near genocide since childhood vasectomies, if not fixed relatively soon afterwards, are very likely to end up permanent and irreversible.
I dunno who keeps selling the idea that a vasectomy is just a cutesy little switch on/off procedure, but once again those supporting authoritarian megalomaniacs are proving to be anatomically illiterate in the incredibly harmful mandates they back.
This is still just a recipe for near genocide since childhood vasectomies, if not fixed relatively soon afterwards, are very likely to end up permanent and irreversible.
The divide remains very simple and quite impossible to mend :
Conservatives think the baby is alive. Thus don't kill baby.
Liberals think there is no baby. Just a lump of lifeless meat until the doctor magically makes it alive coming out of the vagina. Thus BBQ the meat.
Also, Democrats are dumb, Government already mandates what men need to do with their body. At 18, you need to sign up for Selective Service or you are jailed 5 years.
Because those resources can be spent on the woman herself. The child having a father isn't valuable to her.
Why do you think they want free everything for kids - because it doesn't come out of mommy's money that way. They want the risk/reward of having a child entirely built around their desire for riches.
Although what’s odd about child support is I’ve known guys who are very involved in their children’s life but still pay a massive amount of child support
I would rather lynch the legislators and police-who-enforce-this than submit to such. Ever. And I would do it wearing no mask, hiding nothing; proudly posing next to the dead piked bodies of these evil men, in public, before I'd permit my sons to undergo this. If I were then judged? I would submit, and accept no pleas. The court would have to KILL me, because I would spend the rest of my life as a thorn in their several unjust asses.
Typo? Surely. This was a woman's bill from years ago, was voted entirely on gender + party lines (All D women support, D men against, R unanimous against)
I always get a little afraid when they push something like this. It'll never pass, but it shows their true intent.
I wish our side was as vindictive as theirs. The response to this should be to remove pregnancy as a protected class from being fired and ban maternity leave. Really sicken them. Of course, standing up to feminists isn't in the Republican playbook, they only banned abortion because God said so.
The Republicans don't have any spine when it comes to taking on women, and that's why their puppet Biden put anti-feminists on the terrorist watch list, banned only white men from receiving business bailouts and gave out millions to women's bullshit causes.
D+38. They aren't going to change their fucking minds about you.
I know male lawmakers have pushed this shit in the past. This is a man soyboy pushing this one too.
It'll never pass, but it shows their true intent.
Wrong, it shows how braindead they are, that they don't understand reality, and can't make an accurate comparison or good faith argument to save their lives.
They're not legitimately trying to pass this (although I do agree it's disturbing they'd even make the argument), they're trying (and failing) to produce an analog to the so-called "abortion ban." This is what they think the male equivalent to limiting abortion it, and that's the only reason they're putting forward this ridiculous bill.
Even Occupy Democrats gets it:
Obviously, this is a sarcastic bill meant to highlight how Republicans want to control women’s reproductive organs but any bill regulating men’s glands is shocking.
They're just trying to make a point about abortion...but they're retarded.
Still, even trying this as a joke or a message should immediately get you impeached and removed, as it not only a violation of civil rights, but it shows you're too fucking retarded...even to be a politician.
It's not sarcasm. They're lying. They're testing the water to see if they could get away with a package of vindictive bullshit when/if they win in November.
Never, ever trust claims that something is satire or a joke, these people would kill you legally if they could.
But it's obviously made as a direct comparison to abortion, when they're not even close to being similar. It's a retard sperging.
They could never get away with this. It would be unenforceable, even most soyboys would never vote for this, and if it did somehow get through you'd have a civil war.
Even the Democrats aren't stupid enough to legitimately ask for this. This is one guy "sending a message." Which is not to say they might not legitimately try in a few decades, but we're not there yet, even with the slippery slope. This dude is just a braindead "ally."
Yes, their lunatic fringe would kill us if they could, but you're taking this bill too seriously. The vast majority of them only want to continue tightening the screws until we die without them having to physically act.
But the elephant in the room that's bigger than the most obese female is that everyone is just accepting all this bullshit. When's the last time one of these cabal scumbags was drug out of their office and hanged by a justifiably furious crowd of White men?
What's the female equivalent of a vasectomy called? Is it still called the same thing? I've never had a Twitter account, or I'd try trolling them by suggesting the law should be changed to force women to undergo the same thing for equality.
You just made me think of a better angle for it. Since abstinence isn't an option, then mandatory sterilization is clearly the only way for women to avoid getting pregnant with abortion gone.
Again:
Abortions are not mandatory medical procedures (at least none that Oklahoma bans); and you are mandating an elective procedure on all male children that is not actually all that reversible, regardless of a doctors suggestion.
We already know you support this because it allows for population control, and you demonstrated that you were prepared to mandate medical procedures without consent on children with your previous "vaccination" edicts. The fact that you want this to go through a legislature for the first time is a fucking improvement from what you normally do. At least you fucking asked this time!
If you just announce that you are going to criminalize pre-marital sex, you'll actually get Christian support.
I said it above, but I think the real issue is that they're fucking retarded.
This is a lawmaker essentially trolling, and trying to make a comparison to the abortion "ban." But failing due to the aforementioned retardation. He's not saying he wants this (although he should still be immediately removed for attempted civil rights violations and, again, the retardation), but that in his fucked up mind this is the exact same thing the evil Repubs are trying to do to the whamen!
It's just a retard.
What the person is proposing is litterally a crime against humanity.
Well, that's literally true. Imagine any other mammal claiming to "have rights", and it becomes apparent how silly the idea of "human rights" are.
Either you can do something, or you can't do it. Then there may or may not be consequences. Other members of your species may react, or perhaps you've violated a physical law like gravity. In any case, there is no such thing as immunity from results or consequences of acting.
Broadband internet is a human right. Not being castrated by the state is not.
Why don't you drumpftards understand this???
"Human rights" are a fantasy. They're imaginary.
Rights only exist when they can be and when necessary are defended with violence.
Such things do not dissuade them.
Also again: This is still just a recipe for near genocide since childhood vasectomies, if not fixed relatively soon afterwards, are very likely to end up permanent and irreversible.
I dunno who keeps selling the idea that a vasectomy is just a cutesy little switch on/off procedure, but once again those supporting authoritarian megalomaniacs are proving to be anatomically illiterate in the incredibly harmful mandates they back.
Something something Climate Change
Legislation is not a toy. Any politician who tries to pass such a law should be hanged like the genocidal tyrant he presents himself as being.
Because this is the equivalent of women not being able to kill their babies.
It's like expecting them to take personal responsibility for their sex life is the same as asking them to burn themselves alive
Or they're just being disproportionately vindictive in what they think is making a point but in reality is completely missing it
My money is on both, personally
Well ... I think you're on to something here.
The divide remains very simple and quite impossible to mend :
Conservatives think the baby is alive. Thus don't kill baby.
Liberals think there is no baby. Just a lump of lifeless meat until the doctor magically makes it alive coming out of the vagina. Thus BBQ the meat.
Also, Democrats are dumb, Government already mandates what men need to do with their body. At 18, you need to sign up for Selective Service or you are jailed 5 years.
Draft Our Daughters!
They don't really believe this. it's a rationalization that allows them to feel better about advocating homicide for their selfish ends.
What is hilarious are the posts saying men should be financially obligated to raise their kids. I think that’s great
They only care about extracting resources from men, not actually taking a part in their lives as fathers.
True. I guess I’m being naive.
Because those resources can be spent on the woman herself. The child having a father isn't valuable to her.
Why do you think they want free everything for kids - because it doesn't come out of mommy's money that way. They want the risk/reward of having a child entirely built around their desire for riches.
Although what’s odd about child support is I’ve known guys who are very involved in their children’s life but still pay a massive amount of child support
https://twitter.com/ringtrick/status/1540943836163100673
The Sicilians.flv avatar is on point.
I would rather lynch the legislators and police-who-enforce-this than submit to such. Ever. And I would do it wearing no mask, hiding nothing; proudly posing next to the dead piked bodies of these evil men, in public, before I'd permit my sons to undergo this. If I were then judged? I would submit, and accept no pleas. The court would have to KILL me, because I would spend the rest of my life as a thorn in their several unjust asses.
I dub thee The Tranny Bill.
Typo? Surely. This was a woman's bill from years ago, was voted entirely on gender + party lines (All D women support, D men against, R unanimous against)
I always get a little afraid when they push something like this. It'll never pass, but it shows their true intent.
I wish our side was as vindictive as theirs. The response to this should be to remove pregnancy as a protected class from being fired and ban maternity leave. Really sicken them. Of course, standing up to feminists isn't in the Republican playbook, they only banned abortion because God said so.
The Republicans don't have any spine when it comes to taking on women, and that's why their puppet Biden put anti-feminists on the terrorist watch list, banned only white men from receiving business bailouts and gave out millions to women's bullshit causes.
D+38. They aren't going to change their fucking minds about you.
I know male lawmakers have pushed this shit in the past. This is a
mansoyboy pushing this one too.Wrong, it shows how braindead they are, that they don't understand reality, and can't make an accurate comparison or good faith argument to save their lives.
They're not legitimately trying to pass this (although I do agree it's disturbing they'd even make the argument), they're trying (and failing) to produce an analog to the so-called "abortion ban." This is what they think the male equivalent to limiting abortion it, and that's the only reason they're putting forward this ridiculous bill.
Even Occupy Democrats gets it:
They're just trying to make a point about abortion...but they're retarded.
Still, even trying this as a joke or a message should immediately get you impeached and removed, as it not only a violation of civil rights, but it shows you're too fucking retarded...even to be a politician.
It's not sarcasm. They're lying. They're testing the water to see if they could get away with a package of vindictive bullshit when/if they win in November.
Never, ever trust claims that something is satire or a joke, these people would kill you legally if they could.
But it's obviously made as a direct comparison to abortion, when they're not even close to being similar. It's a retard sperging.
They could never get away with this. It would be unenforceable, even most soyboys would never vote for this, and if it did somehow get through you'd have a civil war.
Even the Democrats aren't stupid enough to legitimately ask for this. This is one guy "sending a message." Which is not to say they might not legitimately try in a few decades, but we're not there yet, even with the slippery slope. This dude is just a braindead "ally."
Yes, their lunatic fringe would kill us if they could, but you're taking this bill too seriously. The vast majority of them only want to continue tightening the screws until we die without them having to physically act.
But the elephant in the room that's bigger than the most obese female is that everyone is just accepting all this bullshit. When's the last time one of these cabal scumbags was drug out of their office and hanged by a justifiably furious crowd of White men?
State mandated body modifications, in other news non Western countries have oppressive regimes.
What's the female equivalent of a vasectomy called? Is it still called the same thing? I've never had a Twitter account, or I'd try trolling them by suggesting the law should be changed to force women to undergo the same thing for equality.
NOT BEING ALLOWED TO HAVE AN ABORTION IS WHAT IT'S CALLED, REEEEEE!
You just made me think of a better angle for it. Since abstinence isn't an option, then mandatory sterilization is clearly the only way for women to avoid getting pregnant with abortion gone.
Tubal ligation. "Tubes tied," if ya nasty.
Nice troll. If he was one of us I would anticipate a bright future.