Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

58
()
posted 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 +58 / -0
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 26 ▼
– acp_k2win 26 points 3 years ago +26 / -0

women will just fall pregnant before deployment, just like they do now when they voluntarily enter the military

of course if we are going all out then we can say "oh and if you get pregnant while in the military you have to get an abortion if your superior orders you to"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

of course if we are going all out then we can say "oh and if you get pregnant while in the military you have to get an abortion if your superior orders you to"

Sounds good to me. They killed "my body my choice" with their clotshot mandate.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– Lurker404 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

You don't think like a communist government.

Can't force them to get abortions because that would "violate human rights". No no, you send them to jail for undermining the military and violating military code by getting pregnant. Of course they can't keep the baby in prison so it gets sent to foster care child trafficking right after birth.

There, you just ruined two lives, sent a message and provided your pedophile and/or satanist bosses with new meat.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– arglide 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Mandatory birth control, the sort where it's an injection once a month. While we're at it, since apparently forcing people to have injections against their will is now totally okay, we should do the same for anyone on any kind of welfare. If you can't even afford to support yourself, you sure as hell shouldn't be allowed to have a kid. The fact that this isn't a mainstream belief, at least amongst republicans, shows what an iron grip the left has on all public discourse.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– GimmeFuelGimmeFire 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Women sign up for the navy and then somehow get pregnant and have to be given leave, many such cases!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I see that as play stupid games win stupid prizes on the Navy's part

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Too bad no free for all abortion. I expect the dumpsters will be full 9 months later though. Hags with bags.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

I still remember when you claimed with 100% confidence that the Democrats were turning on the womens, because they were pushing the draft for women (which will never happen anyway).

Always wrong but never in doubt.

a challenge led by the American Civil Liberties Union

Heh. I guess the ACLU was also turning on the womens.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

I really wanted to believe that.

I suspect this is often a reason for what you say you believe.

But after the dust settled, the whole thing was clearly just to secure the "see, the left does believe in gender equality" line against their obvious support for female privilege.

No one cares about the draft because there isn't going to be one. That is why the left supports it and the right opposes it. They want to encode their stupid 'equality', even though they are not equal, because it will have no negative consequences on their constituencies.

despite the fact that most wars are caused by the shitty candidates they support.

The JEWSWOMEN are responsible for all the wars in the world!

It was a calculated risk by our enemy, that Trump hadn't managed to teach the tradcuck retards how to win. He hadn't.

It was a 'calculated risk' on an issue that no one cared about, in order to show that you want 'equality' even though no one paid any attention to it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– almond_activator 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

The only useful thing women do in the military is improve the morale of the men, which they occasionally crater by hopping from dick to dick on a whim.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GimmeFuelGimmeFire 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

In the military, women would simply eat up all the "safe" jobs and it would still be overwhelmingly men in the most dangerous roles.

This is already the reality though? What would change?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– evilmathmagician2 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

If another draft happens and suddenly every male in the nation identifies as a woman, then this can happen. Too easy to sweep it under the rug by pretending there won't ever be another draft.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– RoulerBleu 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

That's an excellent point.

It's now basically a "hate-crime" to not immediately officially recognize the "transition" of someome who claims to be of the opposite sex. They can't draft women, and you are a woman of you say so.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– GimmeFuelGimmeFire 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

LMAO bingo

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Feelsgood2020 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Automatic citizenship for simply being born in America was originally for black slaves, not anchor babies. Make it right.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark. 1898

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Gizortnik 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

That doesn't say Marbury v. Madison

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This case is where the 'yelling fire in a crowded theater' line comes from, isn't it?

Amazing how fucking twisted the origin of that phrase is, and how it's used today. What it obviously means is 'don't speak up against the government, prole.'

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– deleted 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Not drafting women violates the basic principles of giving them a vote and allowing them into the military. If they can serve voluntarily, they can be forced. If they can vote for someone who starts a war, they can fight in it.

Should 80-year-olds be allowed to vote?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– dagthegnome 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Should 80 year Olds be allowed to vote?

No.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– CarmenOfSandiego 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Don't worry, they can still be President!

Someone I saw briefly yesterday was how the US should start enforcing age/term limits on people once they are a certain age. Funny how that never applied to RBG or others before now. But then, that's (D)ifferent.

Edit: Not saying that shouldn't be the case, generational gaps are a fucking disaster in this way, but the blatant double standards that's happening now that one of the Left's sacred cows has been culled really needs thrown back in their faces while telling them to fuck off.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Yes, they already went through that period of risk of being sent to war.

Wait, so once you're past the age of 40, you can vote for all the wars you want, without having to serve in them? That severely undermines your argument. After all, isn't your paranoid delusion that womens vote for wars in order to get men killed?

So why is it OK for those over 40 to vote to get younger generations killed, without fighting in them?

Women never have and likely never will unless people wake the fuck up.

Didn't you predict that there would be a war in Taiwan this year if the female draft was not passed?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Parus 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

People have to have a stake in it somehow. Either them or their kids.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Because I don't think I've ever heard old people rally behind "kill all young people".

Clearly, you have not heard me. Draft policy should be set based on what you hear people say on social media. Eh, OK.

Still time. I really hope I'm wrong on that

C'mon, you are never wrong.

They've repeatedly agitated Russia in the hope of escalation, Lithuania's blockade of Kaliningrad the latest of many irresponsible actions that show a clear pattern of desire to escalate.

Yes, that is pretty crazy - but so is your claim that Lithuania started the war.

Maybe they'll give up on that and hope they can push China to take Taiwan.

How exactly will that benefit 'them' though?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– GimmeFuelGimmeFire 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

99% of wars in history were started by queens, but 100% of wars were fought by us shitty men!

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy