Not drafting women violates the basic principles of giving them a vote and allowing them into the military. If they can serve voluntarily, they can be forced. If they can vote for someone who starts a war, they can fight in it.
Someone I saw briefly yesterday was how the US should start enforcing age/term limits on people once they are a certain age. Funny how that never applied to RBG or others before now. But then, that's (D)ifferent.
Edit: Not saying that shouldn't be the case, generational gaps are a fucking disaster in this way, but the blatant double standards that's happening now that one of the Left's sacred cows has been culled really needs thrown back in their faces while telling them to fuck off.
Yes, they already went through that period of risk of being sent to war.
Wait, so once you're past the age of 40, you can vote for all the wars you want, without having to serve in them? That severely undermines your argument. After all, isn't your paranoid delusion that womens vote for wars in order to get men killed?
So why is it OK for those over 40 to vote to get younger generations killed, without fighting in them?
Women never have and likely never will unless people wake the fuck up.
Didn't you predict that there would be a war in Taiwan this year if the female draft was not passed?
Because I don't think I've ever heard old people rally behind "kill all young people".
Clearly, you have not heard me. Draft policy should be set based on what you hear people say on social media. Eh, OK.
Still time. I really hope I'm wrong on that
C'mon, you are never wrong.
They've repeatedly agitated Russia in the hope of escalation, Lithuania's blockade of Kaliningrad the latest of many irresponsible actions that show a clear pattern of desire to escalate.
Yes, that is pretty crazy - but so is your claim that Lithuania started the war.
Maybe they'll give up on that and hope they can push China to take Taiwan.
Should 80-year-olds be allowed to vote?
No.
Don't worry, they can still be President!
Someone I saw briefly yesterday was how the US should start enforcing age/term limits on people once they are a certain age. Funny how that never applied to RBG or others before now. But then, that's (D)ifferent.
Edit: Not saying that shouldn't be the case, generational gaps are a fucking disaster in this way, but the blatant double standards that's happening now that one of the Left's sacred cows has been culled really needs thrown back in their faces while telling them to fuck off.
Wait, so once you're past the age of 40, you can vote for all the wars you want, without having to serve in them? That severely undermines your argument. After all, isn't your paranoid delusion that womens vote for wars in order to get men killed?
So why is it OK for those over 40 to vote to get younger generations killed, without fighting in them?
Didn't you predict that there would be a war in Taiwan this year if the female draft was not passed?
People have to have a stake in it somehow. Either them or their kids.
Clearly, you have not heard me. Draft policy should be set based on what you hear people say on social media. Eh, OK.
C'mon, you are never wrong.
Yes, that is pretty crazy - but so is your claim that Lithuania started the war.
How exactly will that benefit 'them' though?