As our resident book whore, let me rant about the way liberals think about books.
Our liberal friends claim their lovely child grooming and generally weird as fuck demonic ideas are being "censored". They have some banned books weeks/month every year when they masturbate to being le heroes for reading shitty books with underage druggy hooker indians getting abortions and gender surgery.
Meanwhile, the truth is different. Said books were never banned. They are just not carried by some rural Kentucky middle school for the blind anymore. Or they got removed from that one school' mandatory list. Kids can still read it, but the fact that they are not actively handed the book SOMEWHERE (they are still given to kids in all the libtard places AND the normal places with libtard teachers/librarians) just means precious children are oppressed, depraved of an education and will definitely fucking kill themselves without reading about one legged black troons.
Not everyone sucking on their girl dicks is trans genocide. Fuckers claim they are being murdered by literally everything ever.
(If they were so murdered, I wouldn't have to listen to their hot takes.)
They don't kill themselves as much as they want you to believe. They just like to claim totes mcgoats real suicide ATTEMPTS to get attention and free things.
Ah, suicide by stupid. Yeah. Also, that retard who got ovaries inserted into him. I will never get over the fact that he is portrayed as some tragic heroine, meanwhile he was an absolute fucking failure of a human.
The thing about Leftist books is that the kind of weird incestuous citations that Wikipedia goes through is the same kind of narrative weaving that Leftist books go through.
It's why they tell you that you can't even criticize a position of theirs until you've read every single book that exists on the subject from all available authors (but only the ones from a Leftist perspective). Meanwhile, you can bet your ass they've never even heard of "Surplus Value" while they espouse Marxism.
The purpose of Leftist books is to re-enforce narrative, and use as a cudgel. Putting your books on display is far more important than reading them.
A local leftists moms group pulled a total own goal by donating A Clockwork Orange to local schools presumably because it was "banned" (which here is a word meaning removed from school libraries because of the multiple explicit rape scenes) in Alabama schools at some point. Clearly none of them had ever read it because besides the rape scenes it's very right-wing, and had just assumed if red state has banned it must be good. And that same mom's group keeps making speeches at school board meetings implying that those who want to "ban" books don't even read. The most viscerally annoying aspect of liberals is their unearned smugness; this mom's group is a bunch of fucking AWFLs who have managed to marry high earning professional husbands giving them time for their "activism" and grooming of their own children; if I hear the phrase "as the mother of a trans-child" one more time...
Ah, gold digging whores. Those are always fun, because once the managed to dig out the gold, they just have to do something to feel like WIVES and LADIES.
People actively working to undermine our nation from within should be endlessly censored, bullied, and worked to death in cobalt mines. I have no problem "censoring" anti-Americans. This is our nations, these are our people. McCarthy was right and what he did was correct. We do not have to tolerate and live side-by-side with infiltrators that want us dead and our children raped, our nation destroyed.
They are easy to identify. Start building the camps for them now.
The media, which can't help themselves from twisting everything to sell ad-space, is desperately trying to spin this as a censorship campaign. This isn't harmful or potential harmful ideas. This is sanctioned harassment and government approved institutional racism. Common Core does not teach kids to think, it is at its most basic function, a form of cultish tactic. Sounds outlandish, until you see the word problems and the way it is to be graded. The tactic here is to shame someone into being silent and obedient. They get the right answer, but you tell them they are wrong and punish them for it, they will only resist so often before they become compliant and willing to learn YOUR 'correct' answer. This is CC.
Preventing the government from indoctrinating your kids is not an infringement of freedom of speech. Freedom of Speech is understood as: "preventing viewpoint discrimination by the government against the citizenry."
The government is a fundamentally coercive force that exists solely at the behest of the people. It does not have free speech rights. It is a weapon. The government is not engaging in the expression of a viewpoint, it's purpose is to train the students in alignment with the curriculum. The government is forbidden from expressing a multiplicity of viewpoints because there is a greater concern that the advocacy of those view points is not politically neutral, and may engage in silencing.
Teachers employed by the government are assigned a curriculum. That curriculum is not speech. The teachers are acting as government trainers and are not engaging in speech. Any free speech done by a bureaucrat is to be done outside of the bureaucracy, otherwise they are speaking on behalf of the state. And the state has no innate right to speak at all. Let alone freely.
This is actually one of the reasons that active duty US military personnel are required not to engage in political speech in a way that might use their military status as a political weapon. The apolitical nature of the military is an imperative for freedom to survive at all. If soldiers want to attend political rallies and speak in support of politicians, they normally have to take off their uniform, and can't invoke that they are speaking on behalf of the state. It is their endorsement, not the state's endorsement.
As such, these teachers are the same. They are representatives of the state, and they are attempting to endorse a single viewpoint and train according to that single viewpoint. They are not speaking freely, they are speaking as an agent of the state.
The government is a weapon, not a person. Weapons don't have rights.
The way it was taught to me is that there are civil liberties and civil rights, with the liberties having a 'shall not be infringed' constructions, and the rights being the ones granted via government forcing them to be so.
Nowhere in that education was it taught that natural rights are granted by virtue of being, and everything the government claims to do for you, it does to you. Especially when it tramples on your 'civil liberties.' For example, Andrew Jackson after the Supreme Court ruled against him: “John Marshall has made his decision now let him enforce it.” The trail of tears followed.
Veiled force underlies everything.
You have the scraps of natural rights that the government deigns to not take.
Yeah, the certification mills have been debased to the point where the degree isn't worth the time and lucre required to obtain them. I'm a big advocate of the 'sweat equity' type of stuff Mike Rowe's been doing. Developing a work ethic and real life skills trumps a debt-fueled degree 9/10 times.
Teachers employed by the government are assigned a curriculum. That curriculum is not speech. The teachers are acting as government trainers and are not engaging in speech. Any free speech done by a bureaucrat is to be done outside of the bureaucracy, otherwise they are speaking on behalf of the state. And the state has no innate right to speak at all. Let alone freely.
This is the heart of the matter. Public schools are state bureaucracies and curricula are dictated from the top down. Individual teachers can be degenerate pedophile child molesters on their own time and, since we aren't about to dismantle US public schools anytime soon, the sooner we get rid of the types of "teachers" who exhibit themselves on TikTok the better off everyone will be.
A world without compulsory government indoctrination "education" will never fly with the general public that would be not only be completely unwilling to pay for their own shit but also do without what amounts to government daycare so women can feel empowered.
Even the nyPOSt frames it as censoring ideas, not protecting kids.
This is such a weird take to me. Every board of education selects specific reading material that aligns with their lesson plan. I'm against public education in general, but if you're going to have it then the people paying for it (taxpayers, the state) decide what's taught. Teachers don't decide. What the state decides to prioritize or not isn't censorship, especially if the kids can go to a library to learn that thing. Education is basically propaganda for children anyway. But at this level when we're talking about mathematics, it's a rigid philosophy. You're teaching logic and numbers. Common Core and CRT are pedagogical methods. Unless they're hiding the existence of geometry or something, it's not censorship by even the broadest of definitions.
Right. Censoring "ideas" in books that you can get at your local bookstore, online from Amazon,or from the local public library.
Any leftist shithead who wants to ruin her children can feed them all the lunatic propaganda she wants. Thankfully, now, at least one state's board of education is removing shit from classrooms and school libraries.
Remember, public school teachers are state employees and have always and forever been required to teach according to school district/B of E guidelines.
Which is why we should narrow down what they teach and eliminate many garbage electives. Specialty schools can be created for parents to enroll their kids in if they want a more well-rounded education, but the state shouldn't pay for that.
As our resident book whore, let me rant about the way liberals think about books.
Our liberal friends claim their lovely child grooming and generally weird as fuck demonic ideas are being "censored". They have some banned books weeks/month every year when they masturbate to being le heroes for reading shitty books with underage druggy hooker indians getting abortions and gender surgery.
Meanwhile, the truth is different. Said books were never banned. They are just not carried by some rural Kentucky middle school for the blind anymore. Or they got removed from that one school' mandatory list. Kids can still read it, but the fact that they are not actively handed the book SOMEWHERE (they are still given to kids in all the libtard places AND the normal places with libtard teachers/librarians) just means precious children are oppressed, depraved of an education and will definitely fucking kill themselves without reading about one legged black troons.
Don't forget that it's literal genocide of said troons.
Not everyone sucking on their girl dicks is trans genocide. Fuckers claim they are being murdered by literally everything ever.
(If they were so murdered, I wouldn't have to listen to their hot takes.)
Funny, most of them die at their own hands or the hands of their johns.
They don't kill themselves as much as they want you to believe. They just like to claim totes mcgoats real suicide ATTEMPTS to get attention and free things.
I include unintentional ODs as suicide.
Ah, suicide by stupid. Yeah. Also, that retard who got ovaries inserted into him. I will never get over the fact that he is portrayed as some tragic heroine, meanwhile he was an absolute fucking failure of a human.
LMAO! The 30s were freaking weird for Europe as a whole.
In fairness, going into Ed Buck's house pretty much is suicide.
when can we upgrade the imagined tranny genocide to a real one?
The thing about Leftist books is that the kind of weird incestuous citations that Wikipedia goes through is the same kind of narrative weaving that Leftist books go through.
It's why they tell you that you can't even criticize a position of theirs until you've read every single book that exists on the subject from all available authors (but only the ones from a Leftist perspective). Meanwhile, you can bet your ass they've never even heard of "Surplus Value" while they espouse Marxism.
The purpose of Leftist books is to re-enforce narrative, and use as a cudgel. Putting your books on display is far more important than reading them.
A local leftists moms group pulled a total own goal by donating A Clockwork Orange to local schools presumably because it was "banned" (which here is a word meaning removed from school libraries because of the multiple explicit rape scenes) in Alabama schools at some point. Clearly none of them had ever read it because besides the rape scenes it's very right-wing, and had just assumed if red state has banned it must be good. And that same mom's group keeps making speeches at school board meetings implying that those who want to "ban" books don't even read. The most viscerally annoying aspect of liberals is their unearned smugness; this mom's group is a bunch of fucking AWFLs who have managed to marry high earning professional husbands giving them time for their "activism" and grooming of their own children; if I hear the phrase "as the mother of a trans-child" one more time...
Ah, gold digging whores. Those are always fun, because once the managed to dig out the gold, they just have to do something to feel like WIVES and LADIES.
People actively working to undermine our nation from within should be endlessly censored, bullied, and worked to death in cobalt mines. I have no problem "censoring" anti-Americans. This is our nations, these are our people. McCarthy was right and what he did was correct. We do not have to tolerate and live side-by-side with infiltrators that want us dead and our children raped, our nation destroyed.
They are easy to identify. Start building the camps for them now.
I wasn't arguing for or against censorship. I was just pointing out that what they claim is censorship... isn't.
In typical liberal fashion, it's all bad faith. None of these people would object to banning Mein Kampf or the Turner Diaries.
The media, which can't help themselves from twisting everything to sell ad-space, is desperately trying to spin this as a censorship campaign. This isn't harmful or potential harmful ideas. This is sanctioned harassment and government approved institutional racism. Common Core does not teach kids to think, it is at its most basic function, a form of cultish tactic. Sounds outlandish, until you see the word problems and the way it is to be graded. The tactic here is to shame someone into being silent and obedient. They get the right answer, but you tell them they are wrong and punish them for it, they will only resist so often before they become compliant and willing to learn YOUR 'correct' answer. This is CC.
Preventing the government from indoctrinating your kids is not an infringement of freedom of speech. Freedom of Speech is understood as: "preventing viewpoint discrimination by the government against the citizenry."
The government is a fundamentally coercive force that exists solely at the behest of the people. It does not have free speech rights. It is a weapon. The government is not engaging in the expression of a viewpoint, it's purpose is to train the students in alignment with the curriculum. The government is forbidden from expressing a multiplicity of viewpoints because there is a greater concern that the advocacy of those view points is not politically neutral, and may engage in silencing.
Teachers employed by the government are assigned a curriculum. That curriculum is not speech. The teachers are acting as government trainers and are not engaging in speech. Any free speech done by a bureaucrat is to be done outside of the bureaucracy, otherwise they are speaking on behalf of the state. And the state has no innate right to speak at all. Let alone freely.
This is actually one of the reasons that active duty US military personnel are required not to engage in political speech in a way that might use their military status as a political weapon. The apolitical nature of the military is an imperative for freedom to survive at all. If soldiers want to attend political rallies and speak in support of politicians, they normally have to take off their uniform, and can't invoke that they are speaking on behalf of the state. It is their endorsement, not the state's endorsement.
As such, these teachers are the same. They are representatives of the state, and they are attempting to endorse a single viewpoint and train according to that single viewpoint. They are not speaking freely, they are speaking as an agent of the state.
The government is a weapon, not a person. Weapons don't have rights.
Absolutely agree.
The way it was taught to me is that there are civil liberties and civil rights, with the liberties having a 'shall not be infringed' constructions, and the rights being the ones granted via government forcing them to be so.
Nowhere in that education was it taught that natural rights are granted by virtue of being, and everything the government claims to do for you, it does to you. Especially when it tramples on your 'civil liberties.' For example, Andrew Jackson after the Supreme Court ruled against him: “John Marshall has made his decision now let him enforce it.” The trail of tears followed.
Veiled force underlies everything.
You have the scraps of natural rights that the government deigns to not take.
It's worth remembering that.
Your natural rights are defended by the constitution... of men.
We are not a nation of laws. We are nation of men, with a state of laws.
Yep, which is why the state of education bothers me so.
What are the men of tomorrow being taught?
They are being taught not to send their kids to college and have them just get jobs straight out of school.
That's what I've been telling them at least.
Yeah, the certification mills have been debased to the point where the degree isn't worth the time and lucre required to obtain them. I'm a big advocate of the 'sweat equity' type of stuff Mike Rowe's been doing. Developing a work ethic and real life skills trumps a debt-fueled degree 9/10 times.
This is the heart of the matter. Public schools are state bureaucracies and curricula are dictated from the top down. Individual teachers can be degenerate pedophile child molesters on their own time and, since we aren't about to dismantle US public schools anytime soon, the sooner we get rid of the types of "teachers" who exhibit themselves on TikTok the better off everyone will be.
A world without compulsory government
indoctrination"education" will never fly with the general public that would be not only be completely unwilling to pay for their own shit but also do without what amounts to government daycare so women can feel empowered.You really are as bad as those morons in south africa who claim a monkey with a stick can summon lightning.
Remember: they want you dead. They want your children raped. All of these motherfuckers. You know who they are. They are out in the open about it now.
And they think it's funny.
they have names, and addresses.
they have to sleep at some point.
This is such a weird take to me. Every board of education selects specific reading material that aligns with their lesson plan. I'm against public education in general, but if you're going to have it then the people paying for it (taxpayers, the state) decide what's taught. Teachers don't decide. What the state decides to prioritize or not isn't censorship, especially if the kids can go to a library to learn that thing. Education is basically propaganda for children anyway. But at this level when we're talking about mathematics, it's a rigid philosophy. You're teaching logic and numbers. Common Core and CRT are pedagogical methods. Unless they're hiding the existence of geometry or something, it's not censorship by even the broadest of definitions.
NY Post cucked out in 2020.
Right. Censoring "ideas" in books that you can get at your local bookstore, online from Amazon,or from the local public library.
Any leftist shithead who wants to ruin her children can feed them all the lunatic propaganda she wants. Thankfully, now, at least one state's board of education is removing shit from classrooms and school libraries.
Remember, public school teachers are state employees and have always and forever been required to teach according to school district/B of E guidelines.
Which is why we should narrow down what they teach and eliminate many garbage electives. Specialty schools can be created for parents to enroll their kids in if they want a more well-rounded education, but the state shouldn't pay for that.