Now apply the ratio of reported, ignored and mocked like everything else.
There's been plenty before too but the media spun them as justified by the murderer (husband was supposedly abusive, boyfriend shouldn't have made her angry, he had it coming.)
Yes. I mean, I will never be over his theory about women specifically organise to kill men in March every year because of weird ceremonial black magic reason or something.
The supposed connections he makes are legitimately paranoid crazy level. Then he says "all the pieces are there, I'm the only one who sees them, but they all make sense". Yeah right.
I noticed that AoV is the only "anti-idpol" type who argues with him. This tracks well with my theory that the "anti-idpol" types tend to be hack-frauds. Dom will jannie him as well, to be fair.
Ban evasion after getting another r16 ban. As I mentioned last week his r16 bans have been removed after a week or so in the past, probably as a cooldown period more than anything, but he then used an alt account to post a thread about Epic going woke [WHO EVER COULD SEE THAT COMING?!] because he can't not talking about women for too long.
I thought of him this morning while reading Victor Davis Hanson's history of Sherman's march through Georgia. There are many accounts of Southern women pushing their spouses and fiances into war, even postponing marriage until their man confronted northerners. Southern women were largely entitled, decadent, and lazy, while badgering men to go kill themselves.
none of us were asked if we wanted this rule to exist.
At this point, you might be tempted to say that "mods as group are dickless retarded male feminists conspiring to impose arbitrary pro feminist rules that no one asked for."
But, please don't, because that would be a Rule Sixteen violation.
Two cases that were picked up on by media.
Now apply the ratio of reported, ignored and mocked like everything else.
There's been plenty before too but the media spun them as justified by the murderer (husband was supposedly abusive, boyfriend shouldn't have made her angry, he had it coming.)
#freeimp
his coments add variety here, but it may be astroturf
Yes. I mean, I will never be over his theory about women specifically organise to kill men in March every year because of weird ceremonial black magic reason or something.
The supposed connections he makes are legitimately paranoid crazy level. Then he says "all the pieces are there, I'm the only one who sees them, but they all make sense". Yeah right.
He just talks about women in the same way feminists talk about men. I find it refreshing.
I noticed that AoV is the only "anti-idpol" type who argues with him. This tracks well with my theory that the "anti-idpol" types tend to be hack-frauds. Dom will jannie him as well, to be fair.
Two notes. He also doesn't like it when people criticize israel.
I don't think so. He comes across as legitimately mentally unwell to me.
It was a month long ban so I'm told. I guess he has maybe 2 weeks left in kotakujail
Ban evasion after getting another r16 ban. As I mentioned last week his r16 bans have been removed after a week or so in the past, probably as a cooldown period more than anything, but he then used an alt account to post a thread about Epic going woke [WHO EVER COULD SEE THAT COMING?!] because he can't not talking about women for too long.
I thought of him this morning while reading Victor Davis Hanson's history of Sherman's march through Georgia. There are many accounts of Southern women pushing their spouses and fiances into war, even postponing marriage until their man confronted northerners. Southern women were largely entitled, decadent, and lazy, while badgering men to go kill themselves.
All women, the same thing happened in both world wars.
Broke: Men are making bad decisions and suffering the consequences
Woke: Women are preying on men
Bespoke: Those men deserved to die for being coomers
I saw that some male mayor of one of those ukranian cities was kidnapped and killed, and replaced with a woman. Thought of TheImpossible.
As explained previously, he is a habitual violator of Rule Sixteen: "Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring."
As a public service, here are two examples of what constitutes or does not constitute a violation of Rule Sixteen (as I understand it):
I urge you to please NOT engage in violations of Rule Sixteen.
none of us were asked if we wanted this rule to exist.
At this point, you might be tempted to say that "mods as group are dickless retarded male feminists conspiring to impose arbitrary pro feminist rules that no one asked for."
But, please don't, because that would be a Rule Sixteen violation.
Does this mean Antifa gets a free pass here?