Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

44
Florida Just Passed The "Don't Say Gay" Bill (archive.ph)
posted 4 years ago by Galean 4 years ago by Galean +44 / -0
32 comments share
32 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (32)
sorted by:
▲ 31 ▼
– Galean [S] 31 points 4 years ago +31 / -0

Apparently this would endanger: "health and safety of LGBTQ+ kids"

This is about kindergarten to 3'd grade.

Why in this fucked up clown world are there LGBTQ+ kids in this age group?

Just why does the left keep coming for the kids, the most innocent and defenseless of us.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– ailurus 29 points 4 years ago +29 / -0

This is about kindergarten to 3'd grade.

And that's only a minor part of the bill. And not the part they're upset about. The part they're upset about is that the majority of the stuff in the bill forces schools to let parents know more about what's going on in there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– deleted 22 points 4 years ago +22 / -0
▲ 21 ▼
– all_uwu_no_cap 21 points 4 years ago +21 / -0

It's a humiliation ritual. They're showing what they can do to you, and daring you to do something about it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– AnotherSchwarzesMark 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

Why in this fucked up clown world are there LGBTQ+ kids in this age group?

Imagine seeing an 8 year old and thinking: "I need to teach him to like buttsecks" ...these people actually belong in hell.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

It's very simple: to them straight relationships/people ought not be in a privileged position over gay/trans ones. Therefore if you can talk casually about a straight couple being married and having a family, you need to be able to casually talk about gay and trans relationships. If you can casually talk about hetero sex (which they have been pushing since at least the early 90s: Bill Clinton's Surgeon General was fired for pushing teaching grade school children to masturbate at some UN conference), then you must be able to talk about hetero sex.

What the Christians were saying in the 80s and early 90s has proven 100% correct: it would not stop with "teaching kids the basics" and would indeed be used to push all sorts of agendas on children contrary to the values and wishes of their parents. That promise being broken, why should the right uphold its end of the bargain by allowing talk about sex or relationships in schools at all? Not like 4th graders are in any better position to understand any of this. Not like there are fewer degenerates teaching grades 4+.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 1 more comment
▲ 20 ▼
– acp_k2win 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0

Its a small start. Need to keep going until the demons are driven out.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Cetra 19 points 4 years ago +19 / -0

disgusting. I learnt about lgbt in high school when they tried to "educate" us on it. And i already feel disgusted by that brainwashing attempt. and now they want to brainwash kids.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– MetalGearMk4 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

I must be old cause they didn't do any of that shit when I was in highschool and that was kinda not that long ago

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– onetruephilosoraptor 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

I am in my 30s and the globalists in power were more slow boil then.

They didn't have the audacity to push grooming when I was in school.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– realerfunction 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

yeah we didn't have any of this faggot shit at my school. end of bush/start of obama.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– revenantae 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0

Stop calling it that. Play their game and ALWAYS refer to it as the "anti-grooming" bill. The wacky left wins a lot of the time simply with terminology. They rename things such that you are a bad person if you are for/against the things they don't like/like. We should be doing the same thing. When someone screams about "don't say gay" ALWAYS respond with "You mean the anti child grooming bill???? Are you a pedo by chance?"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– scormac1752 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

Why does this only stop kindergarten through third grade? It should cover all grades.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Kweebecker 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

The bill contains a large number of things within it.

After third grade, there is some expectation of health-class discussions, so no outright banning of content. Instead, they must disclose the curriculum to the parents of all the children and have it approved. In addition to this, for all grades, it bans the discouraging or forbidding of children/students from talking to their parents about things discussed in school (the fact this is even necessary is obscene).

The K-3 restriction is just one element, a blanket restriction on all sex content. No teaching little timmy how to take it up the ass, and no teaching little sally how to take it up the vaj either. Just a blanket restriction on sexual predation regardless of the pred's predilections. But middle school may require some topics of such to be breached in health education, so that blanket ban wouldn't work there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Smith1980 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

I don’t get the uproar over this. Public schools spend way too much time on crap like this. Why not teach budgeting instead of lgbt stuff. Why do we care what a small fraction of people do

permalink save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– Ricky_CIA 26 points 4 years ago +26 / -0

The uproar is when leftists lose even a little bit of power it's a GIANT EMERGENCY.

We're not going to de-wokeify this country without bloodshed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Galean [S] 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

My problem is that this is for children between 3 and 8.

Why are they discussing LGBT stuff with those that should not be LGBT in anyway. This are innocent kids. They should learn about playing with other kids and math. The left also objects over the part where the parents need to be informed.

I do not want to be a conspiracy theorist but gays do not have kids, they only reproduce by grooming.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– acp_k2win 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

This are innocent kids.

Their stated goal is to DESTROY innocence. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2043610616671056

These people are demons.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Smith1980 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

And as a Christian I can agree not to preach the gospel to kids, but if I can’t share my views then they shouldn’t share theirs. Reading, writing, and arithmetic

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– CarmenOfSandiego 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

They shouldn't need to be discussing sex at all with children that young regardless of subtopic, degenerate cult or not.

The only goal this has is increasing acceptance in an easily influence age group for either malicious [grooming] or stupidity [enforcement] when currently LGBT acceptance is currently falling for the first time in ages - partly because the T is drawing so much attention that not only are outside groups no longer supporting the LGBT as a whole but internally LGB don't want anything to do with T either.

In addition to all that every fucking time [I'm being hyperbolic] there is "gay representation" it's always the same stereotype of a 'flaming, high pitched, faggot'. For a pattern to be that widespread inside a single group it very much is a cultural/grooming aspect and yet stereotyping is meant to be a bad thing according to the dumbass wokesters crying out about this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Grumman 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

I don’t get the uproar over this.

It's very simple: some people are pedophiles, and they don't want their access to groom your children to be taken away from them. The only sex ed a third grader should have is "If somebody tells you to keep a secret from your parents, they're up to no good, and it's even more important that you tell your parents."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– aboardthegravyboat 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

Here I thought child abuse was already illegal

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– acp_k2win 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

plot twist: it isn't if you call it "gender affirming"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– CptLightning 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

"Don't say gay" bill

Will people here ever stop using the leftist framing on everything?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– acp_k2win 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

"You can't groom kids you God damned pedos and also you can't hide personal shit that parents have the right to know" is kind of awkward as a title

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– CptLightning 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

"Anti-grooming bill" fits in just as many characters as the leftist framing and is more accurate

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Justified. If you can't yet pick your own clothes, you definitely can't pick your sexuality.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– realerfunction 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

good start. keep pushing. drive them out of the shadows.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy