It's not men, it's Pakis. I can think of at least two reasons she won't admit that. But she has pronouns in her name so her opinion on anything is irrelevant.
In a conflict, men have to fight to the death because they will be wiped out by the invading force when they lose. Women's survival strategy is to open their legs for the conquerors. In peace time, women's weapon is social manipulation, while men still maintain violence as the ultimate decider in any interaction. As women gain political power, it is in their interest to use their social skills to undermine any possibility of violence in order to secure their power. As the virtuous men within their own nation, who have a vested interest in protecting their women, become incapable of utilizing violence, the most vicious men and outsiders are unopposed when they resort to violence to capture women. This is why feminists ironically create a society that is unsafe for women. Under a strong patriarchal society, she would have the safety walking down the street that she desires.
Under a strong patriarchal society, she would have the safety walking down the street that she desiresof not leaving her father or husband's house without an escort
Men have a vested interest in protecting the bearers and nurturers of children, and if they don't they have become decrepit creatures that barely qualify as animals. Stop trying to draw fundamental truths out of our current decaying civilization, which is an abberational blip in human history, and look towards the many thousands of years of peoples who built great civilizations. Women and men need to assume their appropriate roles in society in order to produce eudamonia. When men abrogate their role as patriarchs and force women to degrade themselves by filling the void, things go to shit.
It is like we used to build great buildings from stone that last a thousand years, of course they protected the next generation otherwise there would be no point to building monuments.
Nowadays we build ugly disposable high rise buildings and let TV and internet educate children.
Practically speaking though, I don't know how you can vet people for hateful ideas unless they volunteer the information, and even so, I don't trust anyone with authority to be the arbiter of what is "hateful" or not. That type of authority would get abused faster than you can say "Parag Agrawal".
We've got Tam, in Canada, talking about racism and colonizers spreading xiflu, now this.
Medicine does not need women, science does not need women, governments do not need women. Children need women, and when they're put in charge of anyone else they treat them like children anyway.
Fun fact, that was actually a feminist propaganda bit over a century ago, back in its nascence. Prior to that, in divorce and in child custodianship, it would often default to the men, who were expected to be gainfully employed, educated in some skill, and socially adjusted, and thus able to raise and support children. The whole "women are the primary caregivers and can feed off of divorce and child support payments" narrative is actually a somewhat recent one, for historical values of recent.
Why, let's assume first of all that everything they've told is true, then that means you should skip both the first and second doses as they don't work and just get the booster, which should work. And the only way that would be possible is if they reconfigured and adjusted what was in the booster.
But then that would mean all of the first and second shots are useless and should just be tossed out. But then you have the UK buying tens of millions of doses of a shot that doesn't work.
And then you have to consider the scale of production, it should at minimum takes a few months to properly adjust even the base formula to work effectively against a new strain that mutated to bypass the old one. Even after all of that, it should take weeks to make enough doses for even a small country let alone multiple nations totaling hundreds of millions who should theoretically be getting it.
But there's no wait time, a new scary mutation comes out that completely ignores everything from the previous shots and we're already ready for that with brand new shots.
Never are these shots completely scrapped to start with a new formula which one would consider that the variants have a way around and something completely different would be more effective.
Additionally, why are they universally failing, it's not being reported that only Pfizer recipients are the ones that are getting whatever variant comes around. But yet it's all of them. Not one company states they are starting over.
It's not men, it's Pakis. I can think of at least two reasons she won't admit that. But she has pronouns in her name so her opinion on anything is irrelevant.
In a conflict, men have to fight to the death because they will be wiped out by the invading force when they lose. Women's survival strategy is to open their legs for the conquerors. In peace time, women's weapon is social manipulation, while men still maintain violence as the ultimate decider in any interaction. As women gain political power, it is in their interest to use their social skills to undermine any possibility of violence in order to secure their power. As the virtuous men within their own nation, who have a vested interest in protecting their women, become incapable of utilizing violence, the most vicious men and outsiders are unopposed when they resort to violence to capture women. This is why feminists ironically create a society that is unsafe for women. Under a strong patriarchal society, she would have the safety walking down the street that she desires.
fixed that for you
I was trolling reddit last night and some girl posted like "I can't go outside without a male relative." I told her that was based and she is lucky.
Men have a vested interest in protecting the bearers and nurturers of children, and if they don't they have become decrepit creatures that barely qualify as animals. Stop trying to draw fundamental truths out of our current decaying civilization, which is an abberational blip in human history, and look towards the many thousands of years of peoples who built great civilizations. Women and men need to assume their appropriate roles in society in order to produce eudamonia. When men abrogate their role as patriarchs and force women to degrade themselves by filling the void, things go to shit.
It is like we used to build great buildings from stone that last a thousand years, of course they protected the next generation otherwise there would be no point to building monuments.
Nowadays we build ugly disposable high rise buildings and let TV and internet educate children.
Upvoting for self-awareness.
Practically speaking though, I don't know how you can vet people for hateful ideas unless they volunteer the information, and even so, I don't trust anyone with authority to be the arbiter of what is "hateful" or not. That type of authority would get abused faster than you can say "Parag Agrawal".
Every damn time...
We've got Tam, in Canada, talking about racism and colonizers spreading xiflu, now this.
Medicine does not need women, science does not need women, governments do not need women. Children need women, and when they're put in charge of anyone else they treat them like children anyway.
Fun fact, that was actually a feminist propaganda bit over a century ago, back in its nascence. Prior to that, in divorce and in child custodianship, it would often default to the men, who were expected to be gainfully employed, educated in some skill, and socially adjusted, and thus able to raise and support children. The whole "women are the primary caregivers and can feed off of divorce and child support payments" narrative is actually a somewhat recent one, for historical values of recent.
fuck off, pronouns.
Get your first dose?
Why, let's assume first of all that everything they've told is true, then that means you should skip both the first and second doses as they don't work and just get the booster, which should work. And the only way that would be possible is if they reconfigured and adjusted what was in the booster.
But then that would mean all of the first and second shots are useless and should just be tossed out. But then you have the UK buying tens of millions of doses of a shot that doesn't work.
And then you have to consider the scale of production, it should at minimum takes a few months to properly adjust even the base formula to work effectively against a new strain that mutated to bypass the old one. Even after all of that, it should take weeks to make enough doses for even a small country let alone multiple nations totaling hundreds of millions who should theoretically be getting it.
But there's no wait time, a new scary mutation comes out that completely ignores everything from the previous shots and we're already ready for that with brand new shots.
Never are these shots completely scrapped to start with a new formula which one would consider that the variants have a way around and something completely different would be more effective.
Additionally, why are they universally failing, it's not being reported that only Pfizer recipients are the ones that are getting whatever variant comes around. But yet it's all of them. Not one company states they are starting over.
I1 we have got to compare cork boards covered in photos and red threads
I don't remember ever sending you that.