It's not about protecting people anymore: it's about protecting feelings. These people will insist that every freedom you have be taken from you if it makes them feel safer, and for that same reason, they will never admit they were wrong about any of this. They'd rather let the world burn down than admit to themselves they were wrong, because that would make them feel bad.
Probably not. I lean more conservative. Just not a fan of people who think the government is going to solve all problems. But not being a branch Covidian gives him/her points in my book.
I wonder if everyone else now considers supporting the Covid vax a red line.
Yeah, I definitely do. Right now this is the most pressing matter as well as the worst violation of human rights I've lived through (so far...). We're literally less free than we were under communism.
Thankfully my choice in this fall's election was easy, because the party I supported even long before - basically libertarians - didn't fail and has been consistently anti-mandate and anti-lockdown since the beginning. (Less thankfully, they got under 3% of the vote and no seats, but I'm kinda used to that.)
No, independent running is available and frankly should be the most supported. Lawyers/ law degrees make up the vast majority of politicians. I don’t think anyone could name a good president that had a law degree in the past century, if not longer.
Doing something to put a likely gruesome end to islam, the globalist conspirators, and the regressive left.
Taking extreme measures to protect our citizens aboard, which will likely mean military incursions unauthorized by local governments.
Rolling back our gun laws to our pre 90's state while giving people with my ideology an opening to get heavier oderince.
Removing all weapon restrictions for melee and less-lethal weaponry.
expanding transparency regarding the enforcement of our laws.
Rolling back our hate speech laws to prevent abuse by extremists while explicitly including whites and men in the legal definition of hate speech.
Ending legal recognition of gender identity in canada while classifying "alt-identites" as extremist behavior and a mental illness.
Instead of the Nordic Model, we should switch to a detain and interrogate model for dealing with prostitution.
Ban extramarital relations to fix the dating pool by forcing women to date around and then hitch up in order to legally get laid, with the only defenses being marital registration problems and declaring rape. Also classify cuckoldry as extramarital relations for the watcher.
Enact aggressive regulations for the live action porn industry.
Enact aggressive regulations to target malvertising.
Immigration. Economic devastation can be recovered from, oppressive laws can be repealed, hollowed-out cities can be rebuilt, but if western countries are demographically absorbed into the Third World, the change is all but permanent, and additionally we'll have factions of squabbling ethnic groups.
To be sure, plenty of other causes are upstream. E.g., if CRT is taught in schools, a generation of young people will push for open borders because they believe white people are evil. Similarly, the war on free speech and tech censorship is making it harder to organize opposition to destructive policies. And prosecutions of any defending themselves and abridgement of gun rights thwarts local resistance. In short, a totalitarian state can force on us what the elite wants, which is the destruction of civilization.
If they push any kind of policy that goes against individual freedom, private property, self defense laws, it's always a no for those fuckers.
But one of the most important things, that maybe people don't care that much... is language... if they speak with woke words... don't matter how good are those shit they push, i don't vote for them.
Becuase if they can't see the culture war and are talking like the enemy, they are not really useful... and i can't trust them... you can't fight a culture war if the langauge you are using, is full of falsehood and conditioning people to accept terms of the enemy and the ideas of those terms subconsciously.
The term "transgender" for example, is not designed to trick people to think that humans can change their biological sex... no, is designed to trick people to separate biology from sexuality... if you use that term, you recognize that gender is a separate thing from biology in your mind, and that is not true.
Call them whatever the fuck you want, but don't use words that are accepting lies and are words of the enemy.
After reading 1984, and reading a lot more about how langauge affects the general population, how authoritarians design langauge to serve their purpose and control the ideas of the people, is probably one of the most important things to notice, because words are one of the most fundamental weapons they use.
I don't support any of them, not anymore after repeated lockdowns. There word is worth less than nothing.
It's not about protecting people anymore: it's about protecting feelings. These people will insist that every freedom you have be taken from you if it makes them feel safer, and for that same reason, they will never admit they were wrong about any of this. They'd rather let the world burn down than admit to themselves they were wrong, because that would make them feel bad.
Well I won’t vote for anyone who is part of the Covid hysteria posse, pushes the “everything is racist” nonsense, or advocates for free stuff.
Probably not. I lean more conservative. Just not a fan of people who think the government is going to solve all problems. But not being a branch Covidian gives him/her points in my book.
If the candidate has dual-citizenship, and dual-loyalties, that is a hard no for me.
There are other citizenships they could (and have) actively pursued, and it is possible to repudiate the so-called "right of return".
Yeah, I definitely do. Right now this is the most pressing matter as well as the worst violation of human rights I've lived through (so far...). We're literally less free than we were under communism.
Thankfully my choice in this fall's election was easy, because the party I supported even long before - basically libertarians - didn't fail and has been consistently anti-mandate and anti-lockdown since the beginning. (Less thankfully, they got under 3% of the vote and no seats, but I'm kinda used to that.)
I don't support politicians. I've voted once and it was just to inflate the numbers of someone the state media constantly called a nazi.
Any party affiliations and if they’re a lawyer.
No, independent running is available and frankly should be the most supported. Lawyers/ law degrees make up the vast majority of politicians. I don’t think anyone could name a good president that had a law degree in the past century, if not longer.
Bernie runs as an independent technically.
He switched to Democrat because the DNC wouldn't let him on the primary ballots otherwise.
I voted against Romney because he thought horse parking was a more worthy Olympic sport than wrestling.
Every issue that is relevant to me:
Doing something to put a likely gruesome end to islam, the globalist conspirators, and the regressive left.
Taking extreme measures to protect our citizens aboard, which will likely mean military incursions unauthorized by local governments.
Rolling back our gun laws to our pre 90's state while giving people with my ideology an opening to get heavier oderince.
Removing all weapon restrictions for melee and less-lethal weaponry.
expanding transparency regarding the enforcement of our laws.
Rolling back our hate speech laws to prevent abuse by extremists while explicitly including whites and men in the legal definition of hate speech.
Ending legal recognition of gender identity in canada while classifying "alt-identites" as extremist behavior and a mental illness.
Instead of the Nordic Model, we should switch to a detain and interrogate model for dealing with prostitution.
Ban extramarital relations to fix the dating pool by forcing women to date around and then hitch up in order to legally get laid, with the only defenses being marital registration problems and declaring rape. Also classify cuckoldry as extramarital relations for the watcher.
Enact aggressive regulations for the live action porn industry.
Enact aggressive regulations to target malvertising.
Bringing back mental institutions.
Immigration. Economic devastation can be recovered from, oppressive laws can be repealed, hollowed-out cities can be rebuilt, but if western countries are demographically absorbed into the Third World, the change is all but permanent, and additionally we'll have factions of squabbling ethnic groups.
To be sure, plenty of other causes are upstream. E.g., if CRT is taught in schools, a generation of young people will push for open borders because they believe white people are evil. Similarly, the war on free speech and tech censorship is making it harder to organize opposition to destructive policies. And prosecutions of any defending themselves and abridgement of gun rights thwarts local resistance. In short, a totalitarian state can force on us what the elite wants, which is the destruction of civilization.
If they push any kind of policy that goes against individual freedom, private property, self defense laws, it's always a no for those fuckers.
But one of the most important things, that maybe people don't care that much... is language... if they speak with woke words... don't matter how good are those shit they push, i don't vote for them.
Becuase if they can't see the culture war and are talking like the enemy, they are not really useful... and i can't trust them... you can't fight a culture war if the langauge you are using, is full of falsehood and conditioning people to accept terms of the enemy and the ideas of those terms subconsciously.
The term "transgender" for example, is not designed to trick people to think that humans can change their biological sex... no, is designed to trick people to separate biology from sexuality... if you use that term, you recognize that gender is a separate thing from biology in your mind, and that is not true.
Call them whatever the fuck you want, but don't use words that are accepting lies and are words of the enemy.
After reading 1984, and reading a lot more about how langauge affects the general population, how authoritarians design langauge to serve their purpose and control the ideas of the people, is probably one of the most important things to notice, because words are one of the most fundamental weapons they use.
OP, did you mean to put "support" and "politician" in the same sentence?
Which color should a wolf's fur be for you to allow them into the sheep den?
Are they pro-white?
He needs to end democracy, expropriate the ruling elite, crush the corporate media, abolish NGOs, and persecute the regime's collaborators.
They must agree to end all foreign aid, and all governmental contributions to NGOs.
Guns. Anything else is petty by comparison.
Gun control. I won’t vote for anyone who is in favor of more gun laws.
Not exactly an issue, but in second place: I don’t vote for politicians who call me in the phone or send me text messages.