What actually happened: https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1457772252590530561
Gaige Grosskreutz admits Kyle Rittenhouse did not fire until Gaige raised his gun and pointed it at Kyle, advancing on him
VIDEO PROOF: https://twitter.com/thevivafrei/status/1457774701673996298
How the media reports it: https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1457780478878965766
this never happened
Daily Beast: https://archive.md/nbtMQ
The man who survived being shot by Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last August testified on Monday that he never tried to kill the heavily-armed teenager. In fact, he said at the teen’s murder trial, he was actually trying to surrender to him.
This also never happened.
I sure hope Kyle Rittenhouse goes after these various media publications about all the lies they maliciously published.
I hope the jury is sequestered.
Why should juror identities ever be disclosed? This seems like a problem that could easily be solved by concealing juror identities. Have jury call in from a sequestered location so they don't have to be physically present to be identified. Jury members shouldn't even need to know what other jury members look like, or what their names are.
That too (don't they do that with high level mob bosses?), but I'm thinking more that they could be influenced by fake news. I'm wondering if the point of these stories is to sway the jury/judge. I know that jurors are always told not to read the news, but they never listen.
It honestly would solve a slew of problems. For one, if jurors just called in from some secure location, there'd be no easy way to know which cases a juror was actually sitting on. This makes it much easier to protect identity, without having to do extreme measures like security, private cars, etc.
Similarly, if jurors were anonymous from each other, they will be more honest. In the Woke Age, there's a huge range of true but socially-damaging things you cannot say. This would really be great to help reduce the impact of this garbage.
The issue I see with that is that it will inevitably lead to: "Yes, he was 'convicted fairly' by an 'anonymous jury of his peers.' No, you can't see them."
He's gonna get paid like that Sandman kid
I sure hope I hope that guy gets so rich
Most journalists and the media are subversive enemies of Western nations, peoples, and cultures.
I remember reading the first articles about Blake after watching the cell phone video. Without even analyzing it I could immediately spot dozens of omissions, misrepresentations, and outright lies about what had happened.
It's all they do.
It's 4th generation warfare, and they are enemy combatants.
The Government itself is on their side, and therefore illegitimate.
AJAB
All Journalists Are Bastards.
This is coming from the top - FACEBOOK banned anybody who said Kyle was innocent.
Honestly, u/Unknownsailor is more correct than you, because you're making a classic mistake.
You're depending on the government to step in and correct this behavior. Who the fuck do you think pays for this shit? Who do you think gets on the regulatory comittees? Who do you think becomes part of the consulting groups and think tanks? You have some very harsh defamation laws and fairness doctrines in TV in the UK, and look where it's got them. Communists have basically seized the entire media establishment. Not Lefties, not Libtards, fucking Trotskyists!
No, regulations exist to benefit the largest corporations who are the ones calling for it, writing it, and teaching the government how to enforce it on their competition.
Go entirely the other direction. Break all funding mechanisms to the press that aren't private support. Destroy every public program going to the media. Have your preferred political candidates refuse to engage with the corporate media except in a limited manner. Give them no legal protection, but also let them be exposed to every avenue of attack from every possible competitor.
Let these people get no protection in the reverse. If Sean Hannity says that Mark Zucker eats babies and rapes kittens every day, fuck 'em. Let the population learn to be exposed to what shit punditry and fake news looks like by forcing them to actually fucking deal with it. Let the people learn what a media diet looks like by forcing them to sink their teeth into shit until they learn to stop doing that.
Using the courts to try and fix the media is no different than trying to save it with "Fact-Checkers".
The reason why this matters is that the media is a monopoly and internet censorship (by monopoly internet corps) has effectively neutered popular truth-seeking media.
Break the monopolies. And remove "corporate personhood"
There is only one solution to the lying media, and that is to make them back up their lies with their honor.
Make dueling great again.
The media has been purely evil. They called Gaige the "Lone Survivor", and "Survivor", and "Shooting Victim". It makes me absolutely fucking sick.
Honestly, Gaige is something else. I genuinely think he's one of the worst human beings many people will ever have the unfortunately experience of encountering. He may be worse than even Rosenbaum who was clearly a fucking psycho, sand same with Huber. Huber seemed like a bully that liked to hurt people who won't fight back, intentionally targeting the helpless. Rosenbaum was clearly worse because he hunted children. But honestly, Rosenbaum would have been too fucking honestly stupid to paint himself as a saint. He's the type of predator that likes being seen as a thug.
But Gaige Grosskreutz? That motherfucker wants to watch you die as he slides a knife between your ribs when you welcome him over for Christmas. He wanted not only to feel the thrill of hunting down and killing someone, but he wanted to be loved for killing. Then he wanted to carry himself as a fucking saint. He sued the fucking city to get money for the attempted murder.
The dude is evil. Genuinely, evil.
So what to the corporate cock-sleeves and pedophile protectors in the media do?
Why, fucking defend him to the death, of course.
I wish this were about politics. It's not. It's a battle between good and evil. And we, as flawed as any of us may be, are absolutely on the side of good compared to the fucking demonic behavior of the media and the establishment.
Ye best start believin' in spiritual wars...yer in one.
i saw one where they said he said he stood there and reloaded
like, you dumb faggot... he didn't fire enough shots to need to reload. how can the media get away with a lie that blatant?
Because they been doing it for YEARS with 0 consequence
deacdes
I bet you that comes from Gaige saying that Rittenhouse racked the gun.
Never appears anywhere in the videos.
Yet, he testified that he did it in court, and also told that to the police, said it on Twitter, and mentioned it in interviews.
When this is over I hope Kyle Rittenhouse sues the shit out all these "media" companies and "journalists" like Nick Sandman did.
95% of journos that work in the mainstream news outlet including NY Times would have been unironically Antifa if they aren't constructing fake narratives like this.
Of course they are.
The media want to make sure the mob feel completely assured of their righteousness. They want to make sure the mob have a completely fictional account of the trial, just as they have a completely fictional account of the shooting.
They have lied about the whole event up until this point….. who thought that would change when it went to trial?
Jews covering for Jews. A story as old as time.