What actually happened: https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1457772252590530561
Gaige Grosskreutz admits Kyle Rittenhouse did not fire until Gaige raised his gun and pointed it at Kyle, advancing on him
VIDEO PROOF: https://twitter.com/thevivafrei/status/1457774701673996298
How the media reports it: https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1457780478878965766
this never happened
Daily Beast: https://archive.md/nbtMQ
The man who survived being shot by Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last August testified on Monday that he never tried to kill the heavily-armed teenager. In fact, he said at the teen’s murder trial, he was actually trying to surrender to him.
This also never happened.
I sure hope Kyle Rittenhouse goes after these various media publications about all the lies they maliciously published.
I hope the jury is sequestered.
Why should juror identities ever be disclosed? This seems like a problem that could easily be solved by concealing juror identities. Have jury call in from a sequestered location so they don't have to be physically present to be identified. Jury members shouldn't even need to know what other jury members look like, or what their names are.
That too (don't they do that with high level mob bosses?), but I'm thinking more that they could be influenced by fake news. I'm wondering if the point of these stories is to sway the jury/judge. I know that jurors are always told not to read the news, but they never listen.
It honestly would solve a slew of problems. For one, if jurors just called in from some secure location, there'd be no easy way to know which cases a juror was actually sitting on. This makes it much easier to protect identity, without having to do extreme measures like security, private cars, etc.
Similarly, if jurors were anonymous from each other, they will be more honest. In the Woke Age, there's a huge range of true but socially-damaging things you cannot say. This would really be great to help reduce the impact of this garbage.
The issue I see with that is that it will inevitably lead to: "Yes, he was 'convicted fairly' by an 'anonymous jury of his peers.' No, you can't see them."
He's gonna get paid like that Sandman kid
I sure hope I hope that guy gets so rich