The "blacks in advertising" redpill is a good one. We are blasted with advertising everywhere, all the time. Once you put that bug in someone's brain, it will be reinforced nonstop. Even better if it's a normie who mainlines that mainstream media 24/7. It's like staring /pol in the face.
Used to be kids would build their own imagined stuff with highly versatile building blocks. Now Legos are basically just licensed prefab model kits with a branded lo-fi aesthetic.
and in-between they had a brief stint of "here's a shitload of fiddly-little-bastard parts and a detailed assembly manual, for when you finally get tired of trying to replicate the box-art without instructions."
I'm pretty sure I've seen most of the pieces used in that set in others. For example the "bottle" is composed of pieces used as windows/walls. I actually bought this set for my sister and while I think I built the less structurally stable parts, she put in a fair bit of thee work. That said I do agree that this set clearly isn't really intended to be deconstructed.
Honestly it wouldn’t be back if this was every now and then but in a majority white country I find it hard to believe their clientele isn’t mostly white.
In 1830 there were only four Jews among the 11,000 Southerners who owned fifty or more slaves.
Historical Facts vs. Antisemitic Fictions: The Truth About Jews, Blacks, Slavery, Racism and Civil Rights (prepared under the auspices of the Simon Wiesenthal Center by Dr. Harold Brackman and Professor Mary R. Lefkowitz; 1993)
The Jewish role in the American slave trade was minimal.
Professor Jacob R. Marcus of Hebrew Union College in The Colonial American Jew (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 702-703
According to historian and rabbi Bertram Korn, there were Jewish owners of plantations, but altogether they constituted only a tiny proportion of the industry.
Bertram W. Korn, "Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865", in The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, MA: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol. 3, p. 180 :
the bullets? that is not a "list", those use numbers, in markup language called "markdown language" , that above is called a "Bulleted list".
I could have cheated and typed a "BULLET" symbol, but I did not.
That above was done using a HYPHEN as first character on a new line, then a normal SPACE then NOT A SPACE, and for safety at the end of each line I put two invisible special characters called "NON-BREAKING SPACES" prior to a return. The NON-BREAKING SPACES might not be needed, and are not even rendered back to browser, but in this site they are critical if typing too short of a sentence.
? !!! "Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity attacks"
I only posted dry historical sourced true facts, on-topic, with no pejorative terms. You confuse me.
In 1830 there were only four Jews among the 11,000 Southerners who owned fifty or more slaves.
Historical Facts vs. Antisemitic Fictions: The Truth About Jews, Blacks, Slavery, Racism and Civil Rights (prepared under the auspices of the Simon Wiesenthal Center by Dr. Harold Brackman and Professor Mary R. Lefkowitz; 1993)
The Jewish role in the American slave trade was minimal.
Professor Jacob R. Marcus of Hebrew Union College in The Colonial American Jew (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 702-703
According to historian and rabbi Bertram Korn, there were Jewish owners of plantations, but altogether they constituted only a tiny proportion of the industry.
Bertram W. Korn, "Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865", in The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, MA: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol. 3, p. 180 :
Born in Connellsville, Pennsylvania, United States into a traditional Jewish family and raised in Homestead, Pennsylvania, Marcus became interested in Reform Judaism at the age of 15. At that time, he travelled to Hebrew Union College (HUC), in Cincinnati, Ohio, to begin his rabbinical training.
Why are you quoting only statistics about Jewish ownership of 50+ slaves / plantations?
I can't see all the claims that have been made in this thread, thanks to excess moderation. But I'm going to guess that the claims were along the same lines as others I've heard, such as: "There were a lot more Jewish slave owners than white, but they were almost entirely city dwellers with 1 or 2 house slaves. Meanwhile, there were fewer white slave owners, but they frequently owned massive plantations with hundreds of slaves. In other words, there were more Jewish slave owners, but more slaves were owned by Whites."
Your counterpoints don't contradict that claim. But if the claim is true, then your points come across as deliberately calculated to paint Jews in the best possible light.
So my question is, what's going on here? Was there a different claim being made, which you're points actually contradict? Do you have evidence that the claim in assuming was made is false? Why did you feel the need to limit your stats to owners of 50+ slaves, as if only that number is relevant?
Nothing important was said. Just the tired and old trope, exactly the same as reading an SJW diarrhea blaming whites, that Jews are a monolith and responsible for all the ills of humanity.
The "blacks in advertising" redpill is a good one. We are blasted with advertising everywhere, all the time. Once you put that bug in someone's brain, it will be reinforced nonstop. Even better if it's a normie who mainlines that mainstream media 24/7. It's like staring /pol in the face.
It says 12+ on the box. I guess that doesn't mean required mental capacity unless the intent is to exclude leftists.
Actually, she looks fucking confused:
"Nigga what the fuck is this shit? You spent money on some fuckin' bullshit lego nonsense when I could have spent that money on shoes..."
Do kids even play with legos anymore? Or do they just play on their tablets?
I legit wouldn't be surprised if the 30+ crowd is their target demo these days.
Those look like the worst legos ever. Good luck re-using those bricks in literally any other build except a bottle/stand.
Used to be kids would build their own imagined stuff with highly versatile building blocks. Now Legos are basically just licensed prefab model kits with a branded lo-fi aesthetic.
Todays lego aren't made for children. It's about as fun as assembling Ikea furniture. Instead they are made for overgrown manbabies and wannabe-nerds.
Yup, exactly my point.
Yeah, at least if all we could think of doing was making some shitty castle, at least it was our shitty castle.
Lego stopped pushing kits for imaginative building a long time ago. Because once you have them, you don't buy more.
Now they only sell "build it yourself" models that are too expensive to let children play with.
and in-between they had a brief stint of "here's a shitload of fiddly-little-bastard parts and a detailed assembly manual, for when you finally get tired of trying to replicate the box-art without instructions."
Those were, at least, reuseable parts.
I'm pretty sure I've seen most of the pieces used in that set in others. For example the "bottle" is composed of pieces used as windows/walls. I actually bought this set for my sister and while I think I built the less structurally stable parts, she put in a fair bit of thee work. That said I do agree that this set clearly isn't really intended to be deconstructed.
this bisch looklike she tryna drink the bottle. where da fuk my hennessy at
Oh yes, I'm sure the single childless professional 30 year old overweight black women are just lining up to buy lego sets of... boats in bottles.
Marketing department cares more about agitprop than selling lego.
Oxymoron
I have that set. It was a fun build. Sits next to my F40.
Neither old warships nor 80s supercars were designed or built by single black female professionals though.
Don't worry though, they gave her nerdy glasses. And a ponytail!
Clearly this is the nerdiest most autistic black woman who ever lived, which is the prime demographic for Lego.
This guy understands how these things work.
Honestly it wouldn’t be back if this was every now and then but in a majority white country I find it hard to believe their clientele isn’t mostly white.
Ah, the ship my ancestors arrived on.
LOL
Hmmm, Very thorough. Yes indeed.
Can you send and paste this info to my inbox? I want some time to go thru these. Good research. It will be used for memes.
Take something with more reliability, he is peddling nation of islam nonsense https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/slave-trade-black-muslim
36,110 entries of slave trades https://www.slavevoyages.org/voyage/database
Historical Facts vs. Antisemitic Fictions: The Truth About Jews, Blacks, Slavery, Racism and Civil Rights (prepared under the auspices of the Simon Wiesenthal Center by Dr. Harold Brackman and Professor Mary R. Lefkowitz; 1993)
Professor Jacob R. Marcus of Hebrew Union College in The Colonial American Jew (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 702-703
Bertram W. Korn, "Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865", in The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, MA: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol. 3, p. 180 :
36,110 entries of slave trades
https://www.slavevoyages.org/voyage/database
Are you a nation of islam follower? https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/slave-trade-black-muslim
Noob question, but what's the code to format lists in comments?
the bullets? that is not a "list", those use numbers, in markup language called "markdown language" , that above is called a "Bulleted list".
I could have cheated and typed a "BULLET" symbol, but I did not.
That above was done using a HYPHEN as first character on a new line, then a normal SPACE then NOT A SPACE, and for safety at the end of each line I put two invisible special characters called "NON-BREAKING SPACES" prior to a return. The NON-BREAKING SPACES might not be needed, and are not even rendered back to browser, but in this site they are critical if typing too short of a sentence.
Thanks.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Hilariously, it was mostly about your comment about blacks.
? !!! "Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity attacks" I only posted dry historical sourced true facts, on-topic, with no pejorative terms. You confuse me.
Historical Facts vs. Antisemitic Fictions: The Truth About Jews, Blacks, Slavery, Racism and Civil Rights (prepared under the auspices of the Simon Wiesenthal Center by Dr. Harold Brackman and Professor Mary R. Lefkowitz; 1993)
Professor Jacob R. Marcus of Hebrew Union College in The Colonial American Jew (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 702-703
Bertram W. Korn, "Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865", in The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, MA: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol. 3, p. 180 :
Not Jewish.
Even if she was... The other sources are clear.
Keep it kosher.
The other sources being a Hebrew college and Jewish historical society 😂.
Holy fuck the pilpul is real.
Looks like you're Jewish too.
Why are you quoting only statistics about Jewish ownership of 50+ slaves / plantations?
I can't see all the claims that have been made in this thread, thanks to excess moderation. But I'm going to guess that the claims were along the same lines as others I've heard, such as: "There were a lot more Jewish slave owners than white, but they were almost entirely city dwellers with 1 or 2 house slaves. Meanwhile, there were fewer white slave owners, but they frequently owned massive plantations with hundreds of slaves. In other words, there were more Jewish slave owners, but more slaves were owned by Whites."
Your counterpoints don't contradict that claim. But if the claim is true, then your points come across as deliberately calculated to paint Jews in the best possible light.
So my question is, what's going on here? Was there a different claim being made, which you're points actually contradict? Do you have evidence that the claim in assuming was made is false? Why did you feel the need to limit your stats to owners of 50+ slaves, as if only that number is relevant?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This doesn't do that.
Read the links I shared.
Oh wow a jew citing jews lying about their history
Wow! An inbred who can't debunk the information! Wow!
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Approved: I wouldn't really consider "inbred" to be a slur.
Can you calm the fuck down, and condense some of your sentences?
I am surprised you downvoted my high-effort original writings. why did (((you))) downvote?
read all of facts that get shoahed for no reason: slavery facts:
https://consumeproduct.win/p/140JFUYRjs/x/c/4JIP2cggQoZ
Sit down faggot.
I downvoted you because we get it, you hate the Portuguese.
tl;dr: THE JOOOOOOS
Nothing important was said. Just the tired and old trope, exactly the same as reading an SJW diarrhea blaming whites, that Jews are a monolith and responsible for all the ills of humanity.
Lol imagine believing what you just said.