? !!! "Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity attacks"
I only posted dry historical sourced true facts, on-topic, with no pejorative terms. You confuse me.
In 1830 there were only four Jews among the 11,000 Southerners who owned fifty or more slaves.
Historical Facts vs. Antisemitic Fictions: The Truth About Jews, Blacks, Slavery, Racism and Civil Rights (prepared under the auspices of the Simon Wiesenthal Center by Dr. Harold Brackman and Professor Mary R. Lefkowitz; 1993)
The Jewish role in the American slave trade was minimal.
Professor Jacob R. Marcus of Hebrew Union College in The Colonial American Jew (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 702-703
According to historian and rabbi Bertram Korn, there were Jewish owners of plantations, but altogether they constituted only a tiny proportion of the industry.
Bertram W. Korn, "Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865", in The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, MA: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol. 3, p. 180 :
Why are you quoting only statistics about Jewish ownership of 50+ slaves / plantations?
I can't see all the claims that have been made in this thread, thanks to excess moderation. But I'm going to guess that the claims were along the same lines as others I've heard, such as: "There were a lot more Jewish slave owners than white, but they were almost entirely city dwellers with 1 or 2 house slaves. Meanwhile, there were fewer white slave owners, but they frequently owned massive plantations with hundreds of slaves. In other words, there were more Jewish slave owners, but more slaves were owned by Whites."
Your counterpoints don't contradict that claim. But if the claim is true, then your points come across as deliberately calculated to paint Jews in the best possible light.
So my question is, what's going on here? Was there a different claim being made, which you're points actually contradict? Do you have evidence that the claim in assuming was made is false? Why did you feel the need to limit your stats to owners of 50+ slaves, as if only that number is relevant?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Hilariously, it was mostly about your comment about blacks.
? !!! "Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity attacks" I only posted dry historical sourced true facts, on-topic, with no pejorative terms. You confuse me.
Historical Facts vs. Antisemitic Fictions: The Truth About Jews, Blacks, Slavery, Racism and Civil Rights (prepared under the auspices of the Simon Wiesenthal Center by Dr. Harold Brackman and Professor Mary R. Lefkowitz; 1993)
Professor Jacob R. Marcus of Hebrew Union College in The Colonial American Jew (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 702-703
Bertram W. Korn, "Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865", in The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, MA: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol. 3, p. 180 :
Not Jewish.
Even if she was... The other sources are clear.
Why are you quoting only statistics about Jewish ownership of 50+ slaves / plantations?
I can't see all the claims that have been made in this thread, thanks to excess moderation. But I'm going to guess that the claims were along the same lines as others I've heard, such as: "There were a lot more Jewish slave owners than white, but they were almost entirely city dwellers with 1 or 2 house slaves. Meanwhile, there were fewer white slave owners, but they frequently owned massive plantations with hundreds of slaves. In other words, there were more Jewish slave owners, but more slaves were owned by Whites."
Your counterpoints don't contradict that claim. But if the claim is true, then your points come across as deliberately calculated to paint Jews in the best possible light.
So my question is, what's going on here? Was there a different claim being made, which you're points actually contradict? Do you have evidence that the claim in assuming was made is false? Why did you feel the need to limit your stats to owners of 50+ slaves, as if only that number is relevant?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This doesn't do that.
Read the links I shared.
Oh wow a jew citing jews lying about their history
Wow! An inbred who can't debunk the information! Wow!