Feminist tries to claim that Legally Blonde was originally a gay movie, gets BTFO by the movie's writer
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (46)
sorted by:
They also tried to make Johnny and Dallas from the Outsiders faggots until SE Hinton told them to shut the fuck up
https://www.vulture.com/2016/10/se-hinton-no-the-outsiders-arent-gay-lovers.html
apparently women cant either
One of them thinks that because a teenager after running away and watching his best friend get mortally wounded, hugs his older brother means that it means they want to suck dicks. They are sexually warped
talk about fucking unempathetic. Ponyboy's best friend died in his arms--he might have been a little distraught about it. But, nah man...it could only be that he was pining for some cock. Let's not forget that those same characters also witnessed another person commit suicide by cop in that novel. Those boys would have all been very very messed up; searching for their sexuality in such a situation is really tone deaf and demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of what is important in life or the effects of generational violence on a psyche.
That's what I mean- they cannot look further than how something affects them. It's the ultimate narcissism. They never see anyone else's viewpoint, they don't even exist. They want them to be faggots so they cook up some weird explanation for it.
I also find it completely unbelievable that two poor kids looking like Matt Dillon or Rob Lowe would be struggling for long. Even back in the early sixties they could have found some lonely woman to take them away from the poor side of town.
You haven't heard about Mel Gibson and Danny Glover?
Also with Kirk and Spock - see Gene Roddenberry’s footnote in Star Trek The Motion Picture’s novelization.
Oh my god! People who lie to make themselves and their agendas look better are narcissistic. Actors could never be narcissistic! Quit being bigots!
I'm starting to get those "Troy Baker on the subject of Kanji" vibes. Completely missing the point of the character to virtue signal.
Naoto is also a great barometer of how much the trannies have overpowered women in the political sphere.
Because it could be a discussion on how a woman has to fake being a man to get anywhere in a career and all that misogyny jazz. You know, something close to the intent.
But nah, chick dresses as a dude. Must want to BE a dude, and is tranny. No logical explanation or disguise, nope all tranny.
The game pretty clearly and explicitly states that any gender dysphoria on Naoto's part is transient and purely externally-motivated due to societal pressures.
And it's not like one line of one dialogue in a missable section of a secret mission in a DLC's optional sidequest, it's literally 10% of the entire game. A good 10% of the game is dedicated to telling you that Naoto is NOT trans.
It's like they've never played it.
I don't get the reference.
Persona4. A game where you explore the inner psyches of characters as JRPG dungeon-crawlers. Kanji's inner psyche is a spa/fitness studio full of buff manly men, and the boss makes JoJo characters look like straight-laced mormons.
But it's an RPG, lots of talking. You can interpret the scenery all you want, but the words were clearly speaking of one specific thing. Which is NOT the thing that internet commentator Troy tried to attach to the character.
Ah, I understand now. Thank you.
Basically what Kweebecker said. But be aware, Troy Baker is not some "internet commentator," he was literally the voice of the character in discussion. Tried to use his character to score some LGBTQ points, when the entire point of his character is "he cares for his mom, loves the family craft (textiles), and loves using said craft to make cute things that kids might buy; THAT DOESN'T MAKE HIM GAY."
Like these people care, they'll just threaten and smear her until they assert their preferred reality.
They don't even need to do that. They can just parrot "Death of the author" and then make up whatever shit they want.
It's looking like this is less about the reader's interpretation and more about bringing authors to heel.
To be fair to the other woman, she was being misinformed by a "credible" newspaper and immediately conceded the point once she realised that the tweet with an unsourced denial of the article's claim was coming from the writer herself.
To be fair to the mentally ill propagandist, she's a piece of shit lackey for the oligarchs.
To be fair.
Bruh shes a journalist. Lazily regurgitating NYT articles does not deserve a tbf.
Ah so all we need is to have the literal writers of every piece of media ever on tap to answer questions and disprove massive reaches with no foundation.
Great, I'll call Lovecraft and Tolkien so we can sort this problem out. There of course is no other option like not making massive reaches for political purposes. No not at all.
Karen destroying that narrative like a young Shaquille O’Neal destroying a backboard. Nice work Karen!
They are obsessed with doing mental gymnastics to find some secret gay meaning in everything. I’ll say it again. LGBT community make your own channel and streaming service and emphasize all the gay storylines you want
There ARE plenty of those already! They have them! It's not enough.
I just don’t get it then. Why does everyone have to see it. I used to think if they had their own stuff I wouldn’t be bothered. Boy was I wrong
"Love and tolerate" isn't enough. They want "Exalt and worship". They want greater rights and privileges. Advantages not available to others. Until they get preferential treatment in all facets of society, it isn't enough. And even then, the degree may not be enough.
I tried to watch this movie but it was too unrealistic showing Harvard as a bastion of WASP privilege, when it's actually a bastion of Jewish privilege. Imagine if they portrayed all of the professors as Jewish, as they actually are.