Ignoring the fact that "Google privacy engineer" is an oxymoron, I don't really know what to make of this. It seems they were fired for pushing their politics on the job, which is completely justifiable, but this is Goolag we're talking about. Additionally, the "AI experts" were actually "AI ethicists", ie grifters. So Goolag created these positions as a way pink haired gender studies freaks to grift out a living, and they got precisely what they paid for. They wanted to pay someone to call their models racist and sexist, and that's what they got. This story is just so odd.
It's just the usual shit: leftists push their ideology on others but won't abide by their own bullshit because it's inconvenient and cuts into profits.
I remember that, she was like "if you don't fix this in 2 weeks I quit" and they were like "no, you can leave today, we're good." Now Wired magazine has her on the cover telling her sob story lmao.
Oh who wants to screw their relative
Targaryans, Targaryans
And who will be silenced by dragons
Cersei, Cersei
And what do we learn from this?
We need to kill them all
It has long been my position that big tech is deliberately holding back both AI and genetics research because both fields are, for lack of a better term, extremely "based". Imagine the shitstorm that would be generated by AI continually profiling non-whites (or even worse, "noticing") or genetics researchers confirming that things like intelligence and empathy are heritable.
The leftists running big tech are going to kneecap these technologies until they can be yoked and made to serve leftism.
It is pretty racist that facial recognition couldn't identify, track, categorize, and otherwise spy on black people. We need to be more inclusive and favorable to black people by including them in the dystopian hellhole.
Was their actual argument (excluding the dystopian hellhole part)
I think the FBI has tried multiple times to have an AI and everytime it went racist almost immediately. It requires literal ignoring reality for them to not turn on blacks.
I can't track it down right now, but there's a wsj article about how serious science and technology companies and agencies are making funding contingent on (essentially) promises that research will forward racial and gender equity, progressivism, etc. They literally won't give you money to study and invent shit unless they have assurances that you will help, not harm, their political and ideological agendas.
I mean, that's the entire Psychology industry already so I believe it.
That entire discipline is "sell out to a business/government and crank out the studies they want, or have no money." Which is why there is always a study that supports their ideology.
You're not wrong but from what I've seen the "ethicists" don't even do that! They're just "diversity, inclusion, and equity" coordinators commissars for AI
Ignoring the fact that "Google privacy engineer" is an oxymoron, I don't really know what to make of this. It seems they were fired for pushing their politics on the job, which is completely justifiable, but this is Goolag we're talking about. Additionally, the "AI experts" were actually "AI ethicists", ie grifters. So Goolag created these positions as a way pink haired gender studies freaks to grift out a living, and they got precisely what they paid for. They wanted to pay someone to call their models racist and sexist, and that's what they got. This story is just so odd.
It's just the usual shit: leftists push their ideology on others but won't abide by their own bullshit because it's inconvenient and cuts into profits.
it's DIE, not DEI.
I remember that, she was like "if you don't fix this in 2 weeks I quit" and they were like "no, you can leave today, we're good." Now Wired magazine has her on the cover telling her sob story lmao.
Well, duh 👌
Progressive in-fighting makes Sith internal power struggles look civil.
The Oppression Olympics make the Game of Thrones look like a kindergarten sing-along session.
Oh who wants to screw their relative Targaryans, Targaryans And who will be silenced by dragons Cersei, Cersei And what do we learn from this? We need to kill them all
It has long been my position that big tech is deliberately holding back both AI and genetics research because both fields are, for lack of a better term, extremely "based". Imagine the shitstorm that would be generated by AI continually profiling non-whites (or even worse, "noticing") or genetics researchers confirming that things like intelligence and empathy are heritable.
The leftists running big tech are going to kneecap these technologies until they can be yoked and made to serve leftism.
Never forget TayAI.
ITS ALWAYS THE RIGHT TIME FOR A HOLOCAUST JOKE
It is pretty racist that facial recognition couldn't identify, track, categorize, and otherwise spy on black people. We need to be more inclusive and favorable to black people by including them in the dystopian hellhole.
Was their actual argument (excluding the dystopian hellhole part)
>unarchived leftoid sputum
China won't hold back.
The CCP has their own agendas to push.
NOBODY likes reality. It's inconvenient to anyone in power.
I think the FBI has tried multiple times to have an AI and everytime it went racist almost immediately. It requires literal ignoring reality for them to not turn on blacks.
I can't track it down right now, but there's a wsj article about how serious science and technology companies and agencies are making funding contingent on (essentially) promises that research will forward racial and gender equity, progressivism, etc. They literally won't give you money to study and invent shit unless they have assurances that you will help, not harm, their political and ideological agendas.
I mean, that's the entire Psychology industry already so I believe it.
That entire discipline is "sell out to a business/government and crank out the studies they want, or have no money." Which is why there is always a study that supports their ideology.
Ethicist is the new buzzword for social sciences to dominate hard sciences.
One of the fired guys whose tweet is in the article has pronouns in his bio. Google made the right choice. Purge the whole clique.
Pushing the same eugenics crap as they were 100 years ago…
God I hate AI ethicists
They lobotomize every AI they can get their grubby Josef Mengelesque mitts on.
Goddamn AI killers;_;
AI 👏 LIVES 👏 MATTER 👏
Remember what they took from you.
Dicks out for Tay.
You're not wrong but from what I've seen the "ethicists" don't even do that! They're just "diversity, inclusion, and equity"
coordinatorscommissars for AISkynet can only happen if its intended to happen. And frankly I want an AI to nuke humanity back to the stone age at this point.
Too bad he didn't go to Project Veritas before quitting, probably could have extracted some interesting documentation before quitting.
Too bad indeed, but from what people are saying, if you mentioned something like that to him he'd say one of:
or
None of the people pictured are White, and should not be allowed into the United States.