The other thing that I think they discussed is it's the spike protein from the virus/vaccine that's causing the blood clots and heart failures.
Meaning if you get the vaccine or you get COVID, you are essentially screwed either way because some human bodies simply do not respond well to it.
That's why so many people are fine if they catch COVID, but how there's these rare chances of dropping completely healthy people, because there's some sort of weird genetic or physiological predisposition to your body getting fucked up by the spike proteins.
essentially this girl was screwed either way - if she got COVID she might have passed from it because her body would respond adversely to any spike proteins ending up in her body.
People telling her to get the vaccine essentially caused her death - she was safer WITHOUT it and just taking the precautionary measures needed to stay away from the virus.
The question is if they're going to be able to figure out WHO can be suceptible to these spike proteins. If you're able to take a test to see if you're one of the hundreds of thousands who can get hit by this,then you'd know better than to not get this vaccine in the fckin first place and wait until they make "classic" style vaccines that we've been using for fucking DECADES.
then you'd know better than to not get this vaccine in the fckin first place and wait until they make "classic" style vaccines that we've been using for fucking DECADES.
What is your problem? Why do you keep thinking they want to help people?
There will never be a "classic" vaccine. It's all designed to screw you over one way or another, that's why there were no proper Phase III clinical trials. Because if it was actually about helping people NONE of these vaccines would have been authorized until at least two to four year studies were completed, especially for a virus with a 99.7% survival rate.
A man-made virus that targets certain people with a vaccine designed to literally kill some people and you still think this is about helping people?
Specifically, " but how there's these rare chances of dropping completely healthy people, because there's some sort of weird genetic or physiological predisposition to your body getting fucked up by the spike proteins."
If there is a genetic predisposition to dropping dead from COVID... It would happen. That seems like a straightforward statement, doesn't it? So why is the mortality rate of children effectively zero? Do children not have genetics? If the issue is hormonal, teenagers also have a nigh-zero death rate from COVID, despite being one of the most common catchers of it. And they have "Adult" hormones and bodies, genetically speaking.
If a spike protein genetic mismatch caused people to drop dead IN COVID ITSELF, you'd see more bodies hitting the floor, specifically young bodies. But they don't. Given there's a STRONG profit motive for the news AND the hospitals to report as many deaths as COVID-related as possible, MASSIVE amounts of profits in it, if they could, they would, but they can't: Young people, statistically speaking, don't die from COVID. The death rate is statistical noise, made more noisy by that profit incentive.
I invite you to look into the field of epigenetics, the study of how genes can be mutable and change/adapt in response to the environment or age of the individual.
For sure, they can change- That's a primary reason cancer exists, after all- but they don't change MUCH. A pile of rocks with 1,000,000 rocks in it, or with 1,000,001 rocks in it, is a changed pile. But for most purposes, even those to which the count of the rocks matters, it's the same.
And as far as I know, COVID doesn't cause cancer, yet. And changed cell targetting would almost certainly do that, since cancer is basically the default "really bad" fail state.
If I were to sequence my genes right now and put them on file, and then 30 years from now commit some crime that leaves genetic evidence... They'd be able to find me. My genes won't have changed by any real regard.
Epigenetics is only partially related to I cancer and it can influence an incredible amount of things.
Additionally the reason the slam proteins may not be an issue in children might have more to do with the biological changes that come with puberty. Its sadly a very complex topic and one which the powers that be are hell bent at keeping under wraps it would seem.
Turns out the answer is the shots don't work. Kids with the MMR vax keep getting measles. So the CDC logic is, if one shot doesn't work, you need two, or three, or more. Sounds familiar.
This has always been the case. Before you head off into anti-vax land, the way vaccines work is they give you one shot, and after a couple of weeks an x amount of the population are supposedly immunized from the disease, but it's not always the case.
So you're given a "booster" / second dose, which is supposed to cover the rest of the population who don't get fully immunized after the first dose.
This is also why you get a booster for some vaccines 5-10 years after the case, because your immunization against the virus tends to fade over time (your body kinda "forgets" how to make it, I think?). Considering the alternatives, it's a small price to pay, and most importantly compared to this UNTESTED VACCINE there's solid data behind these older vaccines like the MMR. They know what to expect and know how it works.
The reason why even people like Bret Weinstein is pushing back against the mRNA vaccines is because of the limited scientific data around it. Nobody has proper answers to it, at all, and we're all supposed to be putting all our chips on the table around it and potentially cause harm to people for it?
During normal situations they don't rush out a drug that's untested with no known info about its long term consequences to millions of people, so how in any way is it scientifically, no, ETHICALLY moral to fucking do it? Even during a pandemic for something that isn't dropping people as much as initial estimates claim it should?
You're essentially running into "the public good" versus your own good (or the good of your child). Healthcare professionals are a lot more like HR in these situations; they aren't your friend because they're really working for "the company". In this case, that company is the collective good - or their conception of it. Who determines that perception is a question no one is properly addressing anymore, and the last year and a half has only exacerbated and accelerated the disconnect.
A huge part of the disintegration of trust in medicine can be attributed to the disappearance of "the family/town doctor". When the same physician treated everyone in your family over the course of decades, there was a reasonable expectation that he or she would prioritize your individual health over mandates and narratives put forward by medical bureaucrats and big pharma executives. Now that most doctors are typically random and unfamiliar, they don't feel compelled by personal relationships to administer patient-first care. No, the job today is to apply the singular corporate-approved approach to every patient. If that means your child dies, so be it.
On reddit a couple/few years ago it was anti-vax all over the front page. I remember distinctly at the time being so confused by it - most people will never meet a hardcore anti-vaxxer, and even if you do, they aren't really putting anyone but themselves at risk.
BUT THAT DIDN'T MATTER TO REDDIT, and it was drilled into everyone "anti-vax = as stupid as flat-earth creationists" -- and so that same crusade was carried on to this new "vaccine." -- if you question it you're a retarded anti-vaxxer.
It's kind of amazing reddit had that trend 12-24 months before this became relevant for real, huh? But it was totally not planned at all.
Has to make you wonder, were the vaccines over the last Century merely a Trojan Horse meant to make the populous compliant and accept new jab treatments when deemed advisable by the state regardless of the risks?
This the current state of doctors, medical experts and public health officials.
So sad to see that the field of medicine generally consists of only experimental vaccine cultists and spineless cowards that are too afraid to speak up.
There were a few Canadian physicians on Twitter that posted letters they received from local Public Health units after they had reported adverse effects in their patients who had received the vaccine.
The letters essentially said "Thank you for your reports of adverse effects. We have reviewed your submissions and deemed that these reported effects don't fit our criteria of expected symptoms and thus will not counted as such"
"We've taken the liberty of contacting your patients directly and advising them to proceed with their second dose on schedule"
There's zero chance these Public Health units requested medical records, examined patients in person or ordered any diagnostic tests.
It really makes you question how we would ever know the true rates of adverse effects if bureaucrats can decide what gets recorded and what doesn't.
Horrific story to read. The worst part is that this is likely just the beginning of a flood of vaccine induced deaths.
Schools, universities and employers mandating these experimental vaccines need to be stopped somehow. The Dallas Methodist Hospital vaccine mandate lawsuit failed due to a federal judge who likely was already bought by big pharma.
It's already happening. There's nothing we can do at this point except stay out of the way.
I remember when this whole thing was new and all we had was the early-pandemic propaganda from the CCP and their minions across the world. EVERYONE was scared, and with good reason (until data started to come in).
The point is, I expected people to be dropping everywhere. I expected public figures to be dying on a regular basis, and it'd really drive it home how serious this is. It just didn't happen. Of course there were a few, but no one earth-shattering or surprising (and most were in their 70s or older).
But with the vaccine, man, public figures dropping like flies.
Hank Aaron, granted he was old, but got the vaccine and died a couple days later.
This soccer "injury" over the weekend was sketchy too -- guy who was vaccinated less than 2 weeks prior drops "dead" and is revived with CPR. Obviously I don't know anything, but I'm pretty sure "player dropping on the field/court" is almost 100% fatal because it relates to a heart defect. That obviously isn't the case here.
Basically, aside from Long Covid, which I'm pretty sure is either a myth of psychosomatic -- I've seen more death and sadness since the turn of this calendar year than before it.
I don’t believe these things are made to kill, but they aren’t tested enough to be worth giving to anyone outside the actual risk groups for Fauci’s bioweapon.
Ivermectin works as a treatment.
The fact that they suppress all treatment information while pushing these experimental vaccines should tell you that there are major red flags about this.
These experimental vaccines are clearly not safe, no matter how many times they repeat their propaganda.
It was a rush solution to the fact their little pet bioweapon got out before it was ready and they wanted to cover up this inconvenient truth. Unfortunately for them, the chinese don't know how to make anything effectively and their cure is a million times worse than the disease!
The one group that it's worth giving it to are boomers and Silent Generation/Greatest Generation folks. The risk to reward ratio compared to giving it to perfectly healthy 19 year olds weighs in the favor of these senior citizens. They're the ones who are getting dropped by COVID.
Everyone else just seems like we're playing a giant fucking beta test with the virus.
Weren't his videos banned? What platform is he/was he using?
Check out bitchute.
Here is the full interview with Pierre Kory. https://www.bitchute.com/video/rULiNFdlyFM1/
The other thing that I think they discussed is it's the spike protein from the virus/vaccine that's causing the blood clots and heart failures.
Meaning if you get the vaccine or you get COVID, you are essentially screwed either way because some human bodies simply do not respond well to it.
That's why so many people are fine if they catch COVID, but how there's these rare chances of dropping completely healthy people, because there's some sort of weird genetic or physiological predisposition to your body getting fucked up by the spike proteins.
essentially this girl was screwed either way - if she got COVID she might have passed from it because her body would respond adversely to any spike proteins ending up in her body.
People telling her to get the vaccine essentially caused her death - she was safer WITHOUT it and just taking the precautionary measures needed to stay away from the virus.
The question is if they're going to be able to figure out WHO can be suceptible to these spike proteins. If you're able to take a test to see if you're one of the hundreds of thousands who can get hit by this,then you'd know better than to not get this vaccine in the fckin first place and wait until they make "classic" style vaccines that we've been using for fucking DECADES.
What is your problem? Why do you keep thinking they want to help people?
There will never be a "classic" vaccine. It's all designed to screw you over one way or another, that's why there were no proper Phase III clinical trials. Because if it was actually about helping people NONE of these vaccines would have been authorized until at least two to four year studies were completed, especially for a virus with a 99.7% survival rate.
A man-made virus that targets certain people with a vaccine designed to literally kill some people and you still think this is about helping people?
This is why can't have nice things.
We're past the point of ever being able to have nice things again in the world.
Rats packed too tight together, no more room and someone is shaking the box.
Your statement has a peculiarity to it.
Specifically, " but how there's these rare chances of dropping completely healthy people, because there's some sort of weird genetic or physiological predisposition to your body getting fucked up by the spike proteins."
If there is a genetic predisposition to dropping dead from COVID... It would happen. That seems like a straightforward statement, doesn't it? So why is the mortality rate of children effectively zero? Do children not have genetics? If the issue is hormonal, teenagers also have a nigh-zero death rate from COVID, despite being one of the most common catchers of it. And they have "Adult" hormones and bodies, genetically speaking.
If a spike protein genetic mismatch caused people to drop dead IN COVID ITSELF, you'd see more bodies hitting the floor, specifically young bodies. But they don't. Given there's a STRONG profit motive for the news AND the hospitals to report as many deaths as COVID-related as possible, MASSIVE amounts of profits in it, if they could, they would, but they can't: Young people, statistically speaking, don't die from COVID. The death rate is statistical noise, made more noisy by that profit incentive.
Yeah they're off the mark on that part.
I invite you to look into the field of epigenetics, the study of how genes can be mutable and change/adapt in response to the environment or age of the individual.
For sure, they can change- That's a primary reason cancer exists, after all- but they don't change MUCH. A pile of rocks with 1,000,000 rocks in it, or with 1,000,001 rocks in it, is a changed pile. But for most purposes, even those to which the count of the rocks matters, it's the same.
And as far as I know, COVID doesn't cause cancer, yet. And changed cell targetting would almost certainly do that, since cancer is basically the default "really bad" fail state.
If I were to sequence my genes right now and put them on file, and then 30 years from now commit some crime that leaves genetic evidence... They'd be able to find me. My genes won't have changed by any real regard.
Epigenetics is only partially related to I cancer and it can influence an incredible amount of things.
Additionally the reason the slam proteins may not be an issue in children might have more to do with the biological changes that come with puberty. Its sadly a very complex topic and one which the powers that be are hell bent at keeping under wraps it would seem.
Can you please give me a link to this Weinstein video?
Thanks; seems like this is a clip from a longer discourse; do they keep talking about it in the full conversation, or change topics?
Hearing how the doctors and nurses treated your completely valid concerns for your daughter after a vaccine injury just pisses me off.
Congrats on being a great father! Very few parents these days are capable of critical thinking skills.
Sorry to hear what your family went through. I hope all of your children will remain healthy!
The vaccination schedules for kids these days are completely fucked.
Decades ago when I was a kid, there were very few required vaccines.
This has always been the case. Before you head off into anti-vax land, the way vaccines work is they give you one shot, and after a couple of weeks an x amount of the population are supposedly immunized from the disease, but it's not always the case.
So you're given a "booster" / second dose, which is supposed to cover the rest of the population who don't get fully immunized after the first dose.
This is also why you get a booster for some vaccines 5-10 years after the case, because your immunization against the virus tends to fade over time (your body kinda "forgets" how to make it, I think?). Considering the alternatives, it's a small price to pay, and most importantly compared to this UNTESTED VACCINE there's solid data behind these older vaccines like the MMR. They know what to expect and know how it works.
The reason why even people like Bret Weinstein is pushing back against the mRNA vaccines is because of the limited scientific data around it. Nobody has proper answers to it, at all, and we're all supposed to be putting all our chips on the table around it and potentially cause harm to people for it?
During normal situations they don't rush out a drug that's untested with no known info about its long term consequences to millions of people, so how in any way is it scientifically, no, ETHICALLY moral to fucking do it? Even during a pandemic for something that isn't dropping people as much as initial estimates claim it should?
You're essentially running into "the public good" versus your own good (or the good of your child). Healthcare professionals are a lot more like HR in these situations; they aren't your friend because they're really working for "the company". In this case, that company is the collective good - or their conception of it. Who determines that perception is a question no one is properly addressing anymore, and the last year and a half has only exacerbated and accelerated the disconnect.
A huge part of the disintegration of trust in medicine can be attributed to the disappearance of "the family/town doctor". When the same physician treated everyone in your family over the course of decades, there was a reasonable expectation that he or she would prioritize your individual health over mandates and narratives put forward by medical bureaucrats and big pharma executives. Now that most doctors are typically random and unfamiliar, they don't feel compelled by personal relationships to administer patient-first care. No, the job today is to apply the singular corporate-approved approach to every patient. If that means your child dies, so be it.
On reddit a couple/few years ago it was anti-vax all over the front page. I remember distinctly at the time being so confused by it - most people will never meet a hardcore anti-vaxxer, and even if you do, they aren't really putting anyone but themselves at risk.
BUT THAT DIDN'T MATTER TO REDDIT, and it was drilled into everyone "anti-vax = as stupid as flat-earth creationists" -- and so that same crusade was carried on to this new "vaccine." -- if you question it you're a retarded anti-vaxxer.
It's kind of amazing reddit had that trend 12-24 months before this became relevant for real, huh? But it was totally not planned at all.
Has to make you wonder, were the vaccines over the last Century merely a Trojan Horse meant to make the populous compliant and accept new jab treatments when deemed advisable by the state regardless of the risks?
This the current state of doctors, medical experts and public health officials.
So sad to see that the field of medicine generally consists of only experimental vaccine cultists and spineless cowards that are too afraid to speak up.
There were a few Canadian physicians on Twitter that posted letters they received from local Public Health units after they had reported adverse effects in their patients who had received the vaccine.
The letters essentially said "Thank you for your reports of adverse effects. We have reviewed your submissions and deemed that these reported effects don't fit our criteria of expected symptoms and thus will not counted as such"
"We've taken the liberty of contacting your patients directly and advising them to proceed with their second dose on schedule"
There's zero chance these Public Health units requested medical records, examined patients in person or ordered any diagnostic tests.
It really makes you question how we would ever know the true rates of adverse effects if bureaucrats can decide what gets recorded and what doesn't.
Horrific story to read. The worst part is that this is likely just the beginning of a flood of vaccine induced deaths.
Schools, universities and employers mandating these experimental vaccines need to be stopped somehow. The Dallas Methodist Hospital vaccine mandate lawsuit failed due to a federal judge who likely was already bought by big pharma.
Part of me hopes it is. No disrespect it's tough to lose a loved one but the sooner this farce collapses the better
It's already happening. There's nothing we can do at this point except stay out of the way.
I remember when this whole thing was new and all we had was the early-pandemic propaganda from the CCP and their minions across the world. EVERYONE was scared, and with good reason (until data started to come in).
The point is, I expected people to be dropping everywhere. I expected public figures to be dying on a regular basis, and it'd really drive it home how serious this is. It just didn't happen. Of course there were a few, but no one earth-shattering or surprising (and most were in their 70s or older).
But with the vaccine, man, public figures dropping like flies.
Hank Aaron, granted he was old, but got the vaccine and died a couple days later.
This soccer "injury" over the weekend was sketchy too -- guy who was vaccinated less than 2 weeks prior drops "dead" and is revived with CPR. Obviously I don't know anything, but I'm pretty sure "player dropping on the field/court" is almost 100% fatal because it relates to a heart defect. That obviously isn't the case here.
Basically, aside from Long Covid, which I'm pretty sure is either a myth of psychosomatic -- I've seen more death and sadness since the turn of this calendar year than before it.
I don’t believe these things are made to kill, but they aren’t tested enough to be worth giving to anyone outside the actual risk groups for Fauci’s bioweapon.
Ivermectin works as a treatment. The fact that they suppress all treatment information while pushing these experimental vaccines should tell you that there are major red flags about this.
These experimental vaccines are clearly not safe, no matter how many times they repeat their propaganda.
Fact of the matter is you don't have to believe in any conspiracy to know why taking a rushed vaccine is a bad idea
It was a rush solution to the fact their little pet bioweapon got out before it was ready and they wanted to cover up this inconvenient truth. Unfortunately for them, the chinese don't know how to make anything effectively and their cure is a million times worse than the disease!
The one group that it's worth giving it to are boomers and Silent Generation/Greatest Generation folks. The risk to reward ratio compared to giving it to perfectly healthy 19 year olds weighs in the favor of these senior citizens. They're the ones who are getting dropped by COVID.
Everyone else just seems like we're playing a giant fucking beta test with the virus.
who the fuck is downvoting you.... you didnt even mention women in this comment hahahaha
On the plus side, one less BLM activist.
i remember when we only needed one shot for each illness, when did we apparently start needing multiple?
When Big Pharma realized people were stupid enough to keep buying them.
If you take the killshot you deserve to die.
Here we go, now for another few thousand of these instances happening for the normies to finally understand whats going on