The other thing that I think they discussed is it's the spike protein from the virus/vaccine that's causing the blood clots and heart failures.
Meaning if you get the vaccine or you get COVID, you are essentially screwed either way because some human bodies simply do not respond well to it.
That's why so many people are fine if they catch COVID, but how there's these rare chances of dropping completely healthy people, because there's some sort of weird genetic or physiological predisposition to your body getting fucked up by the spike proteins.
essentially this girl was screwed either way - if she got COVID she might have passed from it because her body would respond adversely to any spike proteins ending up in her body.
People telling her to get the vaccine essentially caused her death - she was safer WITHOUT it and just taking the precautionary measures needed to stay away from the virus.
The question is if they're going to be able to figure out WHO can be suceptible to these spike proteins. If you're able to take a test to see if you're one of the hundreds of thousands who can get hit by this,then you'd know better than to not get this vaccine in the fckin first place and wait until they make "classic" style vaccines that we've been using for fucking DECADES.
then you'd know better than to not get this vaccine in the fckin first place and wait until they make "classic" style vaccines that we've been using for fucking DECADES.
What is your problem? Why do you keep thinking they want to help people?
There will never be a "classic" vaccine. It's all designed to screw you over one way or another, that's why there were no proper Phase III clinical trials. Because if it was actually about helping people NONE of these vaccines would have been authorized until at least two to four year studies were completed, especially for a virus with a 99.7% survival rate.
A man-made virus that targets certain people with a vaccine designed to literally kill some people and you still think this is about helping people?
Specifically, " but how there's these rare chances of dropping completely healthy people, because there's some sort of weird genetic or physiological predisposition to your body getting fucked up by the spike proteins."
If there is a genetic predisposition to dropping dead from COVID... It would happen. That seems like a straightforward statement, doesn't it? So why is the mortality rate of children effectively zero? Do children not have genetics? If the issue is hormonal, teenagers also have a nigh-zero death rate from COVID, despite being one of the most common catchers of it. And they have "Adult" hormones and bodies, genetically speaking.
If a spike protein genetic mismatch caused people to drop dead IN COVID ITSELF, you'd see more bodies hitting the floor, specifically young bodies. But they don't. Given there's a STRONG profit motive for the news AND the hospitals to report as many deaths as COVID-related as possible, MASSIVE amounts of profits in it, if they could, they would, but they can't: Young people, statistically speaking, don't die from COVID. The death rate is statistical noise, made more noisy by that profit incentive.
I invite you to look into the field of epigenetics, the study of how genes can be mutable and change/adapt in response to the environment or age of the individual.
For sure, they can change- That's a primary reason cancer exists, after all- but they don't change MUCH. A pile of rocks with 1,000,000 rocks in it, or with 1,000,001 rocks in it, is a changed pile. But for most purposes, even those to which the count of the rocks matters, it's the same.
And as far as I know, COVID doesn't cause cancer, yet. And changed cell targetting would almost certainly do that, since cancer is basically the default "really bad" fail state.
If I were to sequence my genes right now and put them on file, and then 30 years from now commit some crime that leaves genetic evidence... They'd be able to find me. My genes won't have changed by any real regard.
Epigenetics is only partially related to I cancer and it can influence an incredible amount of things.
Additionally the reason the slam proteins may not be an issue in children might have more to do with the biological changes that come with puberty. Its sadly a very complex topic and one which the powers that be are hell bent at keeping under wraps it would seem.
The other thing that I think they discussed is it's the spike protein from the virus/vaccine that's causing the blood clots and heart failures.
Meaning if you get the vaccine or you get COVID, you are essentially screwed either way because some human bodies simply do not respond well to it.
That's why so many people are fine if they catch COVID, but how there's these rare chances of dropping completely healthy people, because there's some sort of weird genetic or physiological predisposition to your body getting fucked up by the spike proteins.
essentially this girl was screwed either way - if she got COVID she might have passed from it because her body would respond adversely to any spike proteins ending up in her body.
People telling her to get the vaccine essentially caused her death - she was safer WITHOUT it and just taking the precautionary measures needed to stay away from the virus.
The question is if they're going to be able to figure out WHO can be suceptible to these spike proteins. If you're able to take a test to see if you're one of the hundreds of thousands who can get hit by this,then you'd know better than to not get this vaccine in the fckin first place and wait until they make "classic" style vaccines that we've been using for fucking DECADES.
What is your problem? Why do you keep thinking they want to help people?
There will never be a "classic" vaccine. It's all designed to screw you over one way or another, that's why there were no proper Phase III clinical trials. Because if it was actually about helping people NONE of these vaccines would have been authorized until at least two to four year studies were completed, especially for a virus with a 99.7% survival rate.
A man-made virus that targets certain people with a vaccine designed to literally kill some people and you still think this is about helping people?
This is why can't have nice things.
We're past the point of ever being able to have nice things again in the world.
Rats packed too tight together, no more room and someone is shaking the box.
Your statement has a peculiarity to it.
Specifically, " but how there's these rare chances of dropping completely healthy people, because there's some sort of weird genetic or physiological predisposition to your body getting fucked up by the spike proteins."
If there is a genetic predisposition to dropping dead from COVID... It would happen. That seems like a straightforward statement, doesn't it? So why is the mortality rate of children effectively zero? Do children not have genetics? If the issue is hormonal, teenagers also have a nigh-zero death rate from COVID, despite being one of the most common catchers of it. And they have "Adult" hormones and bodies, genetically speaking.
If a spike protein genetic mismatch caused people to drop dead IN COVID ITSELF, you'd see more bodies hitting the floor, specifically young bodies. But they don't. Given there's a STRONG profit motive for the news AND the hospitals to report as many deaths as COVID-related as possible, MASSIVE amounts of profits in it, if they could, they would, but they can't: Young people, statistically speaking, don't die from COVID. The death rate is statistical noise, made more noisy by that profit incentive.
Yeah they're off the mark on that part.
I invite you to look into the field of epigenetics, the study of how genes can be mutable and change/adapt in response to the environment or age of the individual.
For sure, they can change- That's a primary reason cancer exists, after all- but they don't change MUCH. A pile of rocks with 1,000,000 rocks in it, or with 1,000,001 rocks in it, is a changed pile. But for most purposes, even those to which the count of the rocks matters, it's the same.
And as far as I know, COVID doesn't cause cancer, yet. And changed cell targetting would almost certainly do that, since cancer is basically the default "really bad" fail state.
If I were to sequence my genes right now and put them on file, and then 30 years from now commit some crime that leaves genetic evidence... They'd be able to find me. My genes won't have changed by any real regard.
Epigenetics is only partially related to I cancer and it can influence an incredible amount of things.
Additionally the reason the slam proteins may not be an issue in children might have more to do with the biological changes that come with puberty. Its sadly a very complex topic and one which the powers that be are hell bent at keeping under wraps it would seem.