Specifically, " but how there's these rare chances of dropping completely healthy people, because there's some sort of weird genetic or physiological predisposition to your body getting fucked up by the spike proteins."
If there is a genetic predisposition to dropping dead from COVID... It would happen. That seems like a straightforward statement, doesn't it? So why is the mortality rate of children effectively zero? Do children not have genetics? If the issue is hormonal, teenagers also have a nigh-zero death rate from COVID, despite being one of the most common catchers of it. And they have "Adult" hormones and bodies, genetically speaking.
If a spike protein genetic mismatch caused people to drop dead IN COVID ITSELF, you'd see more bodies hitting the floor, specifically young bodies. But they don't. Given there's a STRONG profit motive for the news AND the hospitals to report as many deaths as COVID-related as possible, MASSIVE amounts of profits in it, if they could, they would, but they can't: Young people, statistically speaking, don't die from COVID. The death rate is statistical noise, made more noisy by that profit incentive.
I invite you to look into the field of epigenetics, the study of how genes can be mutable and change/adapt in response to the environment or age of the individual.
For sure, they can change- That's a primary reason cancer exists, after all- but they don't change MUCH. A pile of rocks with 1,000,000 rocks in it, or with 1,000,001 rocks in it, is a changed pile. But for most purposes, even those to which the count of the rocks matters, it's the same.
And as far as I know, COVID doesn't cause cancer, yet. And changed cell targetting would almost certainly do that, since cancer is basically the default "really bad" fail state.
If I were to sequence my genes right now and put them on file, and then 30 years from now commit some crime that leaves genetic evidence... They'd be able to find me. My genes won't have changed by any real regard.
Epigenetics is only partially related to I cancer and it can influence an incredible amount of things.
Additionally the reason the slam proteins may not be an issue in children might have more to do with the biological changes that come with puberty. Its sadly a very complex topic and one which the powers that be are hell bent at keeping under wraps it would seem.
Your statement has a peculiarity to it.
Specifically, " but how there's these rare chances of dropping completely healthy people, because there's some sort of weird genetic or physiological predisposition to your body getting fucked up by the spike proteins."
If there is a genetic predisposition to dropping dead from COVID... It would happen. That seems like a straightforward statement, doesn't it? So why is the mortality rate of children effectively zero? Do children not have genetics? If the issue is hormonal, teenagers also have a nigh-zero death rate from COVID, despite being one of the most common catchers of it. And they have "Adult" hormones and bodies, genetically speaking.
If a spike protein genetic mismatch caused people to drop dead IN COVID ITSELF, you'd see more bodies hitting the floor, specifically young bodies. But they don't. Given there's a STRONG profit motive for the news AND the hospitals to report as many deaths as COVID-related as possible, MASSIVE amounts of profits in it, if they could, they would, but they can't: Young people, statistically speaking, don't die from COVID. The death rate is statistical noise, made more noisy by that profit incentive.
Yeah they're off the mark on that part.
I invite you to look into the field of epigenetics, the study of how genes can be mutable and change/adapt in response to the environment or age of the individual.
For sure, they can change- That's a primary reason cancer exists, after all- but they don't change MUCH. A pile of rocks with 1,000,000 rocks in it, or with 1,000,001 rocks in it, is a changed pile. But for most purposes, even those to which the count of the rocks matters, it's the same.
And as far as I know, COVID doesn't cause cancer, yet. And changed cell targetting would almost certainly do that, since cancer is basically the default "really bad" fail state.
If I were to sequence my genes right now and put them on file, and then 30 years from now commit some crime that leaves genetic evidence... They'd be able to find me. My genes won't have changed by any real regard.
Epigenetics is only partially related to I cancer and it can influence an incredible amount of things.
Additionally the reason the slam proteins may not be an issue in children might have more to do with the biological changes that come with puberty. Its sadly a very complex topic and one which the powers that be are hell bent at keeping under wraps it would seem.