Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

59
Pregnant women in the frontlines is a symbol of military might! (twitter.com)
posted 5 years ago by ramzaruglia 5 years ago by ramzaruglia +59 / -0
25 comments share
25 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (25)
sorted by:
▲ 42 ▼
– Ahaus667 42 points 5 years ago +42 / -0

The amount of stupidity in this statement shows how pathetic these bureaucrats in uniform are. Pregnant women are one of the largest costs in the military and provide negative combat readiness. The dude actually admits to that in his statement, “the pregnant woman recuperates at home wither her child” that means she’s not fucking fighting dipshit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Lurker404 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

provide negative combat readiness

See? The military is so mighty they can afford to hamstring themselves! Check mate, misogynazi!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 38 ▼
– coke501 38 points 5 years ago +38 / -0

If I were to see pregnant women among my enemies, I'd wonder if they ran out of men.

Also killing a pregnant women means that you killed an enemy and a future enemy, and the possibility for future enemies. Also the men will be more demoralised by dead women.

Sounds like a prime target.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– current_horror 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

demoralized by dead women

Eh...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– my-oh-mai 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

men will be more demoralised by dead women.

Simps, cucks and white knights will be more demoralised by dead women. FTFY

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 22 points 5 years ago +22 / -0

A clown world government deserves a clown world military. I'm not sure if the MIC can enforce global hegemony with a bunch of pregnant women, transsexuals and a few men low-t enough that they haven't been purged for "extremism".

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

It only can as long as it maintains clear technological superiority. As soon as we run up against an adversary we aren't 100 years ahead of technologically, we're going to get our asses kicked.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– DeclineOfTheWest 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

So, China and Russia?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

And the EU, though they themselves are going down the same path as the US; so that's probably a toss-up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– DeclineOfTheWest 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Eh... they’re gonna split.

Germany’s third attempt at trying to unite greater Europe under a single Teutonic banner isn’t going so hot.

You can’t just expect centuries of deep-seated cultural and linguistic divison to be unmade after a poor facsimile of the US is forced among the nations.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– MrGiggles 21 points 5 years ago +21 / -0

I knew the decay was going to accelerate, but no amount of mental preparedness or nihilism can make it easier to accept.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– DeclineOfTheWest 18 points 5 years ago +18 / -0

I never served, but using that as a shield to deflect perfectly valid criticism of the armed forced is a weak tactic. Never mind that introducing women into the military en masse has provided challenges that are rarely addressed officially for fear of social reprisal, pregnancy a major but far from the sole issue.

I’d like to remind everyone that the man who is currently in charge of the military has never served a day in his life, nor his two predecessors. Would this officer bother to publicly criticize any of them if they made a similar statement?

I realize it’s not a completely equatable situation, but again, using someone’s civilian status to deflect blatant policy failure is a logical fallacy.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 10 points 5 years ago +10 / -0

This dude is all "I served 28 years" but then does he tap into that 28 years of experience? No, he immediately goes "our experts say" "our leaders say." I guess those 28 years taught him one thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– DeclineOfTheWest 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

You don’t serve 28 years in the Military without bowing to the politics of those above you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TentElephant 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

I've never flown a helicopter, but I know it isn't going to fly without a rotor and bolted to the ground.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Knife-TotingRat 17 points 5 years ago +17 / -0

Military service should come with a birth-control clause.

Anyway, the way modern western militaries think is bass-ackwards in the first place. You don't send your finest to the front lines as cannon fodder, you send your leftovers, your shit, your Group Ws. That's what went wrong with the Western breed of human vis a vis the upside down cull that was the two World Wars.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 19 points 5 years ago +19 / -0

Women don't belong in the military in the first place. Problem solved.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 15 ▼
– ZodShael 15 points 5 years ago +15 / -0

When the wars in the ME started back in 2002/3, virtually every woman in the military found herself pregnant. This is exactly what will happen again when SHTF. Imagine a new Pearl Harbor happening, and instead of taking the war to them, half of our military finds itself pregnant and unable to fight for years. What's the point of training these people when we already know what happens every time?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 5 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– TechParadox 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

If a military force has actual pregnant women on the front lines in a wartime situation that tells me one thing - the country done fucked up, because that's all they have left. If you can't field an adequate male fighting force as the boots on the ground, you're completely boned from the get-go, because we've all seen the reports of how badly the women perform in Basic, even with lowered standards.

Besides which, as soon as an enlisted woman turns up pregnant, they pull her from active deployment and put her into a non-deployable unit. At that point they're effectively a drain on military resources until they're considered fit to return to active duty.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Lexion 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

These crazy people are now trying to use Tucker Carlson like trump. It's maddening how they keep picking people to use as the next big evil.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– current_horror 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Like the man sad: he was just in the way.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 58 ▼
– deleted 58 points 5 years ago +58 / -0
▲ 50 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 50 points 5 years ago +50 / -0

I had a female in my shop during my squadron tour do it for the 2nd time in 2007. Didn't tell the command until the last Friday before we deployed.

Men can literally shoot themselves in the foot to try to get out of deployment, only to get court-martialed for damaging government property. When women get knocked up to avoid deployment, they get time off and a medal.

Pregnant women are not going to be doing any fighting

Fixed that for you. Next time we enter a no-shit hot war with another nation (not insurgency cells hiding innacaves), watch as they trade their prim buns for pigtails and suddenly decide they want to be a housewife. It's all one big LARP.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy