I kinda feel like they've always been pretty open about that. I dunno, it just doesn't come as this great big shock to me that it seems to be with a lot of people all of a sudden.
The fact that any of them got to wear such an edgy title as "The Intellectual Dark Web" was always kind of dumb considering how mild and inoffensive they all are.
I agree with you on Cathy Young, Christina Hoff Summers and Helen Pluckrose.
I know Candace Owens is a grifter but I haven't seen her shill for leftism.
Jordan Peterson hasn't really shilled for leftism like the others. The only thing I have against him is that he attacked MGTOWs because he is a naive tradcuck.
The dunce doesn't know how to apologize. I. e. his half-assed "apology" when he demanded that Brett Kavanaugh should step down from his SCOTUS nomination so "healing can begin". I don't get on why people bought that long ass non-apology article as an "apology".
He should do a dogeza at this point if he really wants to redeem himself.
I don’t like Candace Owens but honestly I think she or her handlers just kinda read the room. Once the election ended in a loss I kinda appreciated the respite from cringey political stuff that was made cringey specifically because Biden had still won.
Members of the Credentialed Class defend their own.
I read someone make the observation (that definitely applies to me and a fair number of those I know) that a lot of members of the Credentialed class who end up turning against it are first-generation inductees who became disillusioned by it not living up to the hype. While this doesn't appear to explain Rubin, I'm curious if it rings true to others.
"Being silent" on Biden doesn't make you a shill, any more than "being silent" on Trump would make you a Trump shill. People are allowed to talk about what they want to talk about./
If you supported his presidency you can certainly be held to account for his actions, the same way every Trump supporters has been for the last few years.
The IDW is not a formal group with membership but a label for certain people who claim they oppose sjwism and the authoritative progressivism of the left.
In practice, much of the IDW just shills for the left.
Yeah Jordan Peterson was stated to be a part of the IDW.
He was lumped in with them. Same with Joe Rogan. The only people who used that term seriously were the weinsteins and sam harris from what I remember.
It's also worth noting that while the idw were hyper focused on politics, peterson stuck to Pinocchio and saving your father from the underworld. He never really fit in with Shapiro etc.
Sam Harris, Eric Weinstein, Bret Weinstein and Claire Lehmann are some of the most egregious leftist shills to exist.
And all of them are Jews, is that a pattern, or just anudda coincidence...
Shut up.
You are only allowed to notice patterns if the tv man tells you you can.
He is. Can't you do a basic search before opening your mouth?
His mother is, so according to Jewish law he is, I'm talking about ethnicity here not religion.
Their existence is literally “if only we did ‘liberalism’ the right way.”
I kinda feel like they've always been pretty open about that. I dunno, it just doesn't come as this great big shock to me that it seems to be with a lot of people all of a sudden.
The fact that any of them got to wear such an edgy title as "The Intellectual Dark Web" was always kind of dumb considering how mild and inoffensive they all are.
Add these names to the list: Cathy Young, Christina Hoff-Summers, Candance Owens, Helen Pluckrose, Dr. Jordan B. Peterson,.
I agree with you on Cathy Young, Christina Hoff Summers and Helen Pluckrose.
I know Candace Owens is a grifter but I haven't seen her shill for leftism.
Jordan Peterson hasn't really shilled for leftism like the others. The only thing I have against him is that he attacked MGTOWs because he is a naive tradcuck.
Iirc he apologized for that one because he realized he didn't know enough to really comment
He gave a pretty weak apology.
Despite that debacle, I do agree with Peterson on some topics such as the importance of personal responsibility and the hero's journey.
It is very clear that he doesn't understand the current risks of marriage and the abysmal sexual marketplace that the men of today sadly face.
The dunce doesn't know how to apologize. I. e. his half-assed "apology" when he demanded that Brett Kavanaugh should step down from his SCOTUS nomination so "healing can begin". I don't get on why people bought that long ass non-apology article as an "apology".
He should do a dogeza at this point if he really wants to redeem himself.
Kavanagh should step down, but for different reason.
I don’t like Candace Owens but honestly I think she or her handlers just kinda read the room. Once the election ended in a loss I kinda appreciated the respite from cringey political stuff that was made cringey specifically because Biden had still won.
I dunno how long you've been around but we here at GamerGate HQ have a long history with Candace Owens.
She first came into her "fame" by running a leftist doxing service.
That woman will say or do whatever she feels will gain her the most attention. It's why Kanye told her to fuck off.
Now that Trump lost she needs something new to latch on to.
Members of the Credentialed Class defend their own.
I read someone make the observation (that definitely applies to me and a fair number of those I know) that a lot of members of the Credentialed class who end up turning against it are first-generation inductees who became disillusioned by it not living up to the hype. While this doesn't appear to explain Rubin, I'm curious if it rings true to others.
He's such a troll, I love him
If Dave continues down this road, he will be an attractive Ernst Rohm.
When I clicked on the link, I thought Dave Rubin was talking about comics. I was all set to be like "Duh, Dave Rubin. Tell me something I don't know."
"Being silent" on Biden doesn't make you a shill, any more than "being silent" on Trump would make you a Trump shill. People are allowed to talk about what they want to talk about./
The Chief Executive being a vegetable should be a nonpartisan concern.
I'll tell you over and over man:
You're being played to focus on the big hulking fembot while ignoring the long nosed man hiding around the corner with the remote.
Even if true, I wasn't aware the CCP were known for long noses.
I wasn't aware the presidential cabinet was 65% Chinese.
I don't buy it, or at least not yet anyway. Pelosi is the one with her hand up Dementia Joe's ass working him like a ventriloquist dummy.
She's definitely in decline, but I still think she's the one prepping Harris for the inevitable takeover.
If you supported his presidency you can certainly be held to account for his actions, the same way every Trump supporters has been for the last few years.
The IDW is not a formal group with membership but a label for certain people who claim they oppose sjwism and the authoritative progressivism of the left.
In practice, much of the IDW just shills for the left.
Yeah Jordan Peterson was stated to be a part of the IDW.
He was lumped in with them. Same with Joe Rogan. The only people who used that term seriously were the weinsteins and sam harris from what I remember.
It's also worth noting that while the idw were hyper focused on politics, peterson stuck to Pinocchio and saving your father from the underworld. He never really fit in with Shapiro etc.