"Normal" Bret? Who's to say what's "normal"? Times change, and definitions are water not stone. And we must change with them, so I've heard all my life from people like you.
Now you wish to stop "progress"? Who are you to do that, and by what right? Why can you not just go along with this? Why is such a small thing so important to you? We're talking about Human Rights: why are you against Human Rights?
I listened to a chunk of it and it literally devolved into, "Yo we got cash app. Cash app. Venmo. Pay me. Are you gonna just keep talkin, or are you gonna pay me. I see you puttin up yo hand but you ain't puttin up yo wallet. All ya'll in here in solidarity when whitey up here talkin but as soon as we talk about money you out the door."
It went on for like 30 minutes of these joggers going back and forth demanding to be paid just for existing before I just couldn't take it anymore.
At least they're being honest about what a lot of this talk of being "historically disadvantaged" and demand for reparations boils down to: "pay up, whitey"
Back in the days of Atheism+, back in the days when you were still taking the little Evergreeners on field trips, I tried being "anti-racist" and was mocked for being so stupidly arrogant as to think that "labels about racism were self-applied".
"anti-racist" used to be "I'll hire them, but that doesn't mean I want them as my next door neighbor", and later "I don't mind them living in my neighborhood, but that doesn't mean I want them dating my daughter".
Even further back it was "Just because they're genetically inferior doesn't mean they don't deserve equality under the law"
I'm sure Bret Weinstein thinks all those people are hateful racist bigots. Fortunately for us he knows the universal truth of what it means to be "anti-racist", so he can educate us as to why all the "anti-racists by any 'normal' definition" in history were wrong but he is right.
I think he was trying to have a good-faith debate with people who aren't interested in having a good-faith debate. Something he's likely been on the other side of many times before in his life, except the snowball of "progress" has now rolled past him.
Yeah my favorite part has to be the "I'm not a 'classical liberal'; I'm an actual liberal. I've been far left my whole life" part. Maybe you were, but you aren't now: now you're a conservative trying to conserve a society and culture where you're far left. And the society and culture is moving beyond you, and there's nothing you can do to stop it.
Obama once spoke of people "clinging to their guns or religion" because they felt powerless to stop the cultural shift that was happening. Well Bret: how's it feel to be clinging to your outdated definition of "far left" knowing you're powerless to stop a cultural shift that denies you the use of that label? That the only network and TV personality that will let you on is Fox News and Tucker Carlson?
You're just an old man yelling at a cloud, just like all the "actual liberals" before you.
The holocaust was 100 years ago. Anyone that was directly affected is either dead or will be soon. It's losing its cultural cache for this reason and the jews are terrified of that.
They've been doing the Hebrew Two Step forever. Coincidentally, for as long as they've been shoving their anti White propaganda down our throats. I'm more than happy to take them at their word, unlike their golems, as Mr Weinstein is currently finding out.
I don't have any of those handy image macros on my phone, but I'm betting a number of people here do. You surely know what I mean, the classic "Now I'm White, now I'm Jewish."
I don't have any of those handy image macros on my phone
You claimed that "they" have been doing this "forever". So you don't have the evidence beyond... a supposed image macro, which in any case would not prove your sweeping generalization.
You surely know what I mean, the classic "Now I'm White, now I'm Jewish."
I know /pol/-types scream about it a lot, but I have seen precious little evidence that it's widespread. And nothing from that from Bret Weinstein, whom you apparently hate for just being Jewish...
Oh are we looking for empirical data now, Mr Shapiro? Surely you're aware of why something on this topic is going to be impossible to find, or even the people who collect that data.
Everyone here knows exactly what I'm talking about except for you, apparently. And your Oy Veying betrays your intentions.
Surely you're aware of why something on this topic is going to be impossible to find, or even the people who collect that data.
"I have no empirical data, but I is right, because Stormfront said so".
And your Oy Veying betrays your intentions.
Didn't take much for you to drop your pretense that you don't hate Jews. Pretty funny that you Stormfags are so dumb that you're literally accusing the opposite of a Jew of being a Jew, only because your BS was challenged.
You claimed that "they" have been doing this "forever". So you don't have the evidence beyond...
Hell, look up the 60 minutes with Morgan Freeman and Mike Wallace (IIRC). It was exactly this, and that was 20 years ago. Do you want data? Because obviously nobody is going to be able to provide it, so technically you win the argument. Good job.
Or are you looking for a NOT ALL? Because obviously NOT ALL Jewish people do this, but a lot do (not necessarily a large percentage, but there's no shortage of examples), and those that do should be chastised for it. And Bret just did exactly this.
This. Nobody should get their panties in a bunch for pointing out a common phenomenon by asking for a "not all" qualifier. "Not all" is always implied. If someone here thinks almost every black is an outlaw or almost every Jew is traitorous to their homeland or almost every woman wants men to be subjugated, that's on them.
I don't think these are reasonable opinions to have and people have shown here repeatedly that "not all" is absolutely a qualifier whenever such generalizations are made.
The very reason generalizations about Jews (or Muslims, for that matter) are made with such glee is this knee-jerk reaction u/AntonioOfVenice is demonstrating, where there's different standards on who it is okay to generalize about. To put it simply, people will stop circlejerking once they'll stop getting a rush out of it.
Because obviously NOT ALL Jewish people do this, but a lot do (not necessarily a large percentage, but there's no shortage of examples),
There's no shortage of example for any number of things, but the way /pol/tards and Stormfags harp on it is ridiculous. It's almost as if they have a problem with Jews, period.
And Bret just did exactly this.
Nothing wrong with what Bret did. These low IQ ignoramuses were claiming to be oppressioned, by Bret. It's only fair that he point out that he actually belongs to a group who has suffered far more than these idiots.
I often wonder what would suffice as evidence for people like him in an argument like this. We can literally quote Jewish people all day long, and Antonio will just pretend that their own words don't mean what they mean.
"Normal" Bret? Who's to say what's "normal"? Times change, and definitions are water not stone. And we must change with them, so I've heard all my life from people like you.
Now you wish to stop "progress"? Who are you to do that, and by what right? Why can you not just go along with this? Why is such a small thing so important to you? We're talking about Human Rights: why are you against Human Rights?
That was a bit too good
Too high brow for this discussion.
I listened to a chunk of it and it literally devolved into, "Yo we got cash app. Cash app. Venmo. Pay me. Are you gonna just keep talkin, or are you gonna pay me. I see you puttin up yo hand but you ain't puttin up yo wallet. All ya'll in here in solidarity when whitey up here talkin but as soon as we talk about money you out the door."
It went on for like 30 minutes of these joggers going back and forth demanding to be paid just for existing before I just couldn't take it anymore.
At least they're being honest about what a lot of this talk of being "historically disadvantaged" and demand for reparations boils down to: "pay up, whitey"
anti-racist is code for anti-white
Back in the days of Atheism+, back in the days when you were still taking the little Evergreeners on field trips, I tried being "anti-racist" and was mocked for being so stupidly arrogant as to think that "labels about racism were self-applied".
WELCOME TO THE FUCKING CLUB.
"anti-racist" used to be "I'll hire them, but that doesn't mean I want them as my next door neighbor", and later "I don't mind them living in my neighborhood, but that doesn't mean I want them dating my daughter".
Even further back it was "Just because they're genetically inferior doesn't mean they don't deserve equality under the law"
I'm sure Bret Weinstein thinks all those people are hateful racist bigots. Fortunately for us he knows the universal truth of what it means to be "anti-racist", so he can educate us as to why all the "anti-racists by any 'normal' definition" in history were wrong but he is right.
I thought it was a practical joke. So bizarre. What was he even doing among those ignoramuses?
I think he was trying to have a good-faith debate with people who aren't interested in having a good-faith debate. Something he's likely been on the other side of many times before in his life, except the snowball of "progress" has now rolled past him.
Probably his brother Eric called him after and said "See. I told you so."
More like they both commiserated with each other about "I don't understand why they don't see that we're allies, unlike those 'racists' on the right".
This clip has fucking everything. It's beautiful.
Yeah my favorite part has to be the "I'm not a 'classical liberal'; I'm an actual liberal. I've been far left my whole life" part. Maybe you were, but you aren't now: now you're a conservative trying to conserve a society and culture where you're far left. And the society and culture is moving beyond you, and there's nothing you can do to stop it.
Obama once spoke of people "clinging to their guns or religion" because they felt powerless to stop the cultural shift that was happening. Well Bret: how's it feel to be clinging to your outdated definition of "far left" knowing you're powerless to stop a cultural shift that denies you the use of that label? That the only network and TV personality that will let you on is Fox News and Tucker Carlson?
You're just an old man yelling at a cloud, just like all the "actual liberals" before you.
They do this every time they get in hot water, but you'll notice the people questioning him don't accept that as a defense.
If anything, I bet racist blacks dislike Jews more than they dislike whites.
Jews: white people are the worst!
Blacks: yeah, you are!
Jews: not like that!
Just because the tribe badly miscalculated how little the non-white demos care about the holocaust doesn't mean all this shit isn't the tribe's fault.
The holocaust was 100 years ago. Anyone that was directly affected is either dead or will be soon. It's losing its cultural cache for this reason and the jews are terrified of that.
Spicy White made me laugh.
I think we have ourselves a ripe new term, boys.
Made all the funnier since Jewish food is basically Slavic food with some german for flavour. It's all potatoes, bread and cabbage.
Stormfags: Jews are not white.
Also Stormfags: REEEEEE, why did this Jew claim that he is not white?
They've been doing the Hebrew Two Step forever. Coincidentally, for as long as they've been shoving their anti White propaganda down our throats. I'm more than happy to take them at their word, unlike their golems, as Mr Weinstein is currently finding out.
Is that so? Can you substantiate this?
I don't have any of those handy image macros on my phone, but I'm betting a number of people here do. You surely know what I mean, the classic "Now I'm White, now I'm Jewish."
You claimed that "they" have been doing this "forever". So you don't have the evidence beyond... a supposed image macro, which in any case would not prove your sweeping generalization.
I know /pol/-types scream about it a lot, but I have seen precious little evidence that it's widespread. And nothing from that from Bret Weinstein, whom you apparently hate for just being Jewish...
Oh are we looking for empirical data now, Mr Shapiro? Surely you're aware of why something on this topic is going to be impossible to find, or even the people who collect that data.
Everyone here knows exactly what I'm talking about except for you, apparently. And your Oy Veying betrays your intentions.
"I have no empirical data, but I is right, because Stormfront said so".
Didn't take much for you to drop your pretense that you don't hate Jews. Pretty funny that you Stormfags are so dumb that you're literally accusing the opposite of a Jew of being a Jew, only because your BS was challenged.
Hell, look up the 60 minutes with Morgan Freeman and Mike Wallace (IIRC). It was exactly this, and that was 20 years ago. Do you want data? Because obviously nobody is going to be able to provide it, so technically you win the argument. Good job.
Or are you looking for a NOT ALL? Because obviously NOT ALL Jewish people do this, but a lot do (not necessarily a large percentage, but there's no shortage of examples), and those that do should be chastised for it. And Bret just did exactly this.
NOT ALL.
This. Nobody should get their panties in a bunch for pointing out a common phenomenon by asking for a "not all" qualifier. "Not all" is always implied. If someone here thinks almost every black is an outlaw or almost every Jew is traitorous to their homeland or almost every woman wants men to be subjugated, that's on them.
I don't think these are reasonable opinions to have and people have shown here repeatedly that "not all" is absolutely a qualifier whenever such generalizations are made.
The very reason generalizations about Jews (or Muslims, for that matter) are made with such glee is this knee-jerk reaction u/AntonioOfVenice is demonstrating, where there's different standards on who it is okay to generalize about. To put it simply, people will stop circlejerking once they'll stop getting a rush out of it.
I remember that. That was awesome. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/5k2hc4/silly_sjw_smacked_down_by_god_himself_history/
There's no shortage of example for any number of things, but the way /pol/tards and Stormfags harp on it is ridiculous. It's almost as if they have a problem with Jews, period.
Nothing wrong with what Bret did. These low IQ ignoramuses were claiming to be oppressioned, by Bret. It's only fair that he point out that he actually belongs to a group who has suffered far more than these idiots.
How about a thousand examples? https://archive.org/details/TheEuropeanManTweetArchive/mode/2up
No response to this one, Antonio?
I often wonder what would suffice as evidence for people like him in an argument like this. We can literally quote Jewish people all day long, and Antonio will just pretend that their own words don't mean what they mean.
To be fair, he went to sleep 5 hours ago.
Did you look at your supposed evidence? What exactly did you think you are 'proving'?
Retarded comment. Like Snopes level retarded.
In reality, Stormfags: "see, he will reject the white label as soon as it benefits him - exactly like we said he would".
Comment Reported for: Rule 16
Comment Removed