Eloquent Antifa genius has an opinion about us
(i.imgur.com)
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Why do they call us bootlickers when they're the ones licking any boot that has BLM on it?
Because they live and breathe projection. So they assume we literally worship the figures we defend/promote like they do theirs.
Its why they think every Trump voter is an obsessed sycophant, because that's what they are (see AOC, RBG, etc.)
Combine that with "The right thinks the left is wrong, the left thinks the right is evil." and things get distressing fast.
Ever seen any smart people among them? Exactly.
you tell em xirfriend
Loony Lefty to English dictionary
Bootlickers = Anyone not supporting the glorious jackbooted revolutionaries as they take on the oppressive government. They call you boot licker because that's what they want to do, stomp you down and make you lick their boots so they can humiliate you more as they then just keep stomping.
You guys are bootlickers for the police and military, always glorifying them no what what they do
Really? When? Pretty sure we were all disgusted at the murder of Ryan Whittaker. And the attacks on civilians protesting lockdowns or tyrannical takeover. Also at police hearding Trump supporters into Antifa to start fights. Meanwhile you guys are literally getting on the floor and licking their boots.
The projection is strong.
It really bothers them that Rittenhouse stood-up to their heroes.
Yes, that's what he said.
Calling Kyle a murderer is so fucking stupid.
First off he didn't shoot first. There was another man that shot first on video. And in many parts of the country there is a legal doctrine that makes a person starting a violent crime responsible for all crimes connected to it. So in that case both alleged murders would be blamed squarely on that rioter.
Now let's ignore that. Let's just go back to Kyle did not shoot first. So we have 2 men. One shoots in Kyle's general area and one actively chasing Kyle. From Kyle's perspective those two things must be related. And on video it is clear they are related. So Kyle returns fire, returning fire automatically puts this into self-defense. Then we have additional shots fired after fired from a 3rd person. In no viewing of these circumstances can Kyle be expected to not feel under threat of lethal bodily harm. In addition those shooters give Kyle an immediate reason to leave the area, which he does.
If we go further back in time. Kyle puts out a fire at a fucking gas station. A Gas station catching fire likely would have killed or injured several people, possible even Kyle. Again justified self-defense against the people trying to blow up a gas station. Yet Kyle ran from them.
If we go beyond the first death. We go into the lynch mob chasing down a hispanic boy to kill him before he can make it to the police. A group of mostly white people chasing a non-white boy to beat and murder him in the street. That was the purpose, they had no intention of turning him over to the police. They had no intention of having him stand trial. He is knocked to the ground and attacked by multiple people, yet he doesn't just fire at any possible threat. He only fires at the last possible moment for immediate danger. Killing one attacker and disarming one attacker. The disarmed one openly admitting he intended to murder Kyle in the street. With his illegally possessed pistol that he brought to the riot. Things people also miss about this video, there are multiple gunshots in the distance.
At no point is it morally, ethically or legally anything but Kyle justifiably defending himself.
He might have broken some minor firearm law. A law that Kyle has a serious chance of overturning on 2nd amendment grounds. But Kyle did not commit a violent crime.
What happened is that the BLM crowd was already so angry that any opposition deserves death in their view. They would have laughed if Kyle was executed in the street and called him hispanic racial slurs in his death. They would have done that if Kyle didn't kill or harm anyone.
I think, by Vaush's logic, Rittenhouse was obliged to wait until someone blew his brains out before being allowed to respond. Up until that point it was completely unjustified.
Going by his discussion with Destiny, he believes it's wrong to kill multiple people as an individual, even in self defense, because that's obviously represents a greater loss of life than if you just let the mob kill you.
The thing about it is that it is in fact logical. If this is how x situation is going to play out and x individual can simply not defend himself and die, that does in fact result in only one death instead of an indeterminate amount of deaths.
The problem is obviously that it's amoral. His perception of it illuminates the fact that he simply doesn't believe in the sovereignty of the individual. Individual sovereignty is the determining moral factor in what side you fall on in this issue (provided you're not grossly misinformed by legacy media). Individual sovereignty means you have the right to defend yourself from any given threat or threats. Once you remove that principle, his view makes perfect sense.
It also made it clear that Destiny, who clearly does believe in the sovereignty of the individual, isn't too far gone and maybe redeemable. That's really one of the most important core moral principles for someone to have, imo, so there's something there to work with in regards to Destiny. I should watch that stream he did with Sargon. I meant to but never got around to it, maybe he's come around more than I'm aware of.
You're not wrong.
Such a worldview also would appear to excuse any act by a large mob simply as a matter of framing: "Not ransacking your house and looting your possessions damages all of us!"
Literally what communism is lol.
He's probably referring to the KIA2 on reddit, which is locked down.
He's not wrong about Antonio though, given how much shit he pulled because of muh admins.
To be fair, if Trump had won we probably would have gotten the chop along with many others as Reddit rage banned anyone vaguely associated with him.
Keeping our head low enough to get forgotten about might have been the only save in that case.
Die on your feet or live on your knees.
Senseless sacrifices aren't honorable or brave. They are just wasteful in pursuit of ego stroking. A caveman's virtue signal.
Only if I'm provided with a pillow.
I wondered why I could access it again...
Projecting so much, their whole self might as well work as a projector.
Anti free speech? Pretty sure, this inbred mong probably celebrated alex jones banned off the platform.
Bootlicker? I'm sure he has bought expensive Apple and Sony products.
Faggot? Definitely has pronoun bios.
They ran out of insults now they resorted back to basic bitch insults.
You are a faggot though, for opening the Reddit. Keep giving power to people who hate us, that will win us the war.
AJAF
All Jannies Are Faggots
Can confirm.
Reddit is trash, but it's also where the people are. People like us leaving and allowing them to maintain their left-wing echo chamber is exactly what they want. Their censorship makes it almost impossible to fight back, but retreating to this tiny corner of the internet and letting them dominate the eyeballs of their much larger audience with their propaganda uncontested is not a good solution either.
Coom out ye black & reds
We’re not anti-free speech, we’re just showing you the door schnookums ;)
Awwww. It's so neat for me to see that type of leftist working so hard to fill the demand for bigoted people they say exist. It's a market ;)
To be fair Antonio really is a stupid faggot
Lol the "Failed to send"
Not when said child rapist is trying to kill you. That would be self-defense and civic duty.
That's one of their weasel words. Its true in the vaguest stretchiest sense. As they don't believe guns and self defense are lawful, any use of them is murder to them.
And as they know murder implies unjustified and bad to common vernacular, it paints the story with Kyle as the one in the wrong.
Feminists taught me how word games work a long time ago, and they haven't changed that play because of how effective it is.
no, it's pest control.