Welcome to the Competency Collapse (implosion?).
https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1203957-sarah-s-scribbles
Replace refugees with "fake meat" and rape with "cancer".
I still want to know what was really in the mystery juice and why they wanted it in everyone.
The intent is definitely to be a slur. However it lacks particular impact when you're in essence trying to rip on someone for NOT being degenerate fecalpheliac coomer.
"Okay".
That's a lot of NEETbux
So the key takeaway from this is to win 2024
My lefty NPC friends will just say "it's not a big deal" and that the right are just "flipping out over nothing". Even when something is obviously wrong they consistently take the "boiled frog" approach and think it is most prudent to wait until it's "a real problem". Of course they'll never define that, but in practice is just means they'll never push back on any societal change until it is practically too late to do so.
Like the morbidly obese druid?
Looks like Charles II
lol. I came here to find or make this comment.
The original comment was:
[Use of force] is the only cure for such degeneracy
A 5 year old trying on their mother's shoes is not "degeneracy". That is a natural curiosity. The degeneracy I was referring to, which I thought was clear, was becoming a troon. I should also think it should be abundantly clear than parents abusing their children to push them into that is NOT the same scenario.
The comment I was replying to:
I wonder if the parents were embarrassed by her trooning out.
While I can somewhat see where you're coming from, but I think that's a bit of a stretch to assume I'm implying "it's important to crack your 5 year old's orbital bone".
You're not even tempering yourself
Because it's not meant to be taken seriously:
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=beatings+the+cure+for+disorders&first=1
Neglecting your child, let alone beating them, is obviously not a preventative solution to them making poor life choices.
There was no racial component to the original comment?
I would have little trouble believing that furfags are heavily invested into the equivalent of Current Year "headmates".
This isn't reddit. Why are such rules in effect?
Frankly, if the above post constitutes a violation of Rule 2, something I like "you should fight back against someone trying to kill you" would also be violating the rule. I hardly think the above "promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence" especially since it's an generalized, abstract statement, directed at no one in particular ... AND it's a meme.
Would you describe intersectionality as being distinct from identity politics? If intersectionality is "it's not just a feminist problem, but a black, lesbian, feminist <insert other group identity> problem".
I also guess vicitimhood and inversion of the social hierarchy are also cornerstones of woke.
avoid vague phrases like "policy based around feelings"
Great point.
How would you describe it? To me it's a mixture of fixation on identity politics (especially whatever Current Thing happens to be), virtue signaling and pushing of policy based around feelings, not results.
Poor dogs are gonna get monkeypox
Can link to the thread if it's allowed. Now that people are calling it out I too am skeptical, but I didn't really seeing anyone calling it out in the original thread, which is generally the case. Maybe because it wasn't /v/
Doesn't work that way, sweaty. That's already 100% d-i-v-e-r-s-e.
Silent Hill 2 remake for the record.
Have you forgotten about THE FOOD. You can rape and murder as many of my offspring and countrymen as you want, so long as get me some KEBABS. YUMMERS