Yep. Unfortunately no matter how much money they "lose" when you do the napkin math, if you're accepting the 10x bloated Hollywood budget figures, you're playing yourself
This is THE business model of every major company now. It's the entire premise of marketplace-resellers (Amazon, Steam) / SaaS / subscription-model / vendor-lock-in...
Exactly. Slim women on dating sites are not there because it's hard to find a guy, they're there for the high of having 50 guys chasing, or to sleep around
Go ahead and check the checkbox on the job app saying "Black" or "Biracial" etc, why not? If they ask you about it, it's time for a discrimination lawsuit.
More people should be doing what this guy did too. It's actually easier than ever. In the past I've thought of doing this, but if I'm spending any significant amount of time doing something I want it to actually be something useful and productive for me.
However, these days you can just say, "ChatGPT, give me a poem written by a black african author describing racism." Mail it off to a few journals. Once you get a few poems out there then you submit to a publishing house. They are desperate for your Authentic Black Voice™.
The ease of manipulating these frauds could make the whole thing topple.
More than 50% of women in America are obese.
On dating apps it's probably like 75% of women. The ones who aren't AND are using dating apps are more crazy than usual.
White women were the largest beneficiaries of affirmative action quotas and overtook men in college admissions in the 80s because of it.
This is a common assertion by Leftists, but it's really just another angle to present White people as the bad guys.
Lets strip away the Newspeak and see how absurd this sounds in clear, direct language:
"White women were the largest beneficiaries of anti-White hatred and overtook men in college admissions in the 80s because of it..."
Yeah, it sounds absurd when we parse it that way, because it is.
Africans, Hispanics, Arabs, Jews, Asians all receive significantly more benefit from anti-White policies than White women.
Lets break it down with some ballpark numbers for a college admissions process.
- Not-White - 40 pts
- Sexual deviant - 25 pts
- Woman - 20 pts
- Leftist Extracurricular (Abortion Club, Child Trafficker, Riot Planner) - 15 pts
- 4.0 GPA - 10pts
- 1400+ SAT - 10pts
It is true that more White women in cumulative numbers benefitted. In the 1980s and 1990s, the USA was 80 - 90% American (White), So there obviously would be way more White women admitted cumulatively benefitting. But this is a deliberately deceptive Leftist argument that tries to pretend like we should compare the "class" of Whites to the "class" of Africans, Asians, Brownoids. It's a shitty analysis whose only purpose is to attack White people (as usual).
That's a possible reading of this kind of thing, but it's not credible to say that's the subtext that will be communicated to the audience.
I doubt even a significant fraction of the dev team would intend your meaning. It's probably like 95% or more people who see this receiving the more overt "DIE = Good" messaging.
Going to be honest, it doesn't matter what the motivation for putting that in a game is.
What matters is that it reinforces the narrative that "multiculturalism/diversity" is good and should be pursued to protect against criticism. Definitely DIE.
Corollary: Men who acquiesce to whatever women demand are also a parasitic clump of cells.
Why would anyone care at this point? The series started 30 years ago. In that time frame I went from not knowing about his books, to reading them all in a frenzy, to waiting eagerly for the next one, to realizing that he doesn't know what he's doing, to actively despising the subversive anti-heroic narrative he's trying to spin.
Yeah, I think it's almost impossible to stop kids from getting where you don't want them as a parent. Even if you never give them a phone, if they go to public school they will use their friends' unlocked phones. I can guarantee not every kid in school has a dumbphone or a locked-down phone.
Parental neglect or just moms (primarily, but I'm sure some dads too) that kill their kids.
The problem is that "reform" at a certain level is impossible. A person who makes impulsive, stupid decisions will always be a person who makes impulsive, stupid decisions.
You might learn to avoid putting yourself in certain types of situations where your negative traits can compound themselves to catastrophe (e.g. impulsivity + drugs). As people age they tend to learn how to manage their worst tendencies. But your nature is basically unchangeable and always at risk of emerging without controlled conditions.
Anyone who is honest must acknowledge the US Constitution is void after the Civil War. You can't have a "union" that's enforced at gunpoint.
Lincoln marching in and replacing state govts with his own puppets is no different than any other group that's conquered and has a puppet regime of foreigners installed to rule over them.
If you actually look at the data these guys have collected, the AIs are actually more anti-White and anti-Christian.
However, because Jews are the most oppressed group, and Mr. Rosenblatt has an axe to grind, his presents this with a particular slant.
They are also making themselves more miserable at the same time. The only reason they want these jobs is because they've been told the career path is the way to meet some high-earning successful guy. Women competing with men in the workforce makes every single man seem "less successful," which is lose-lose for both men and women. The only people this benefits are the stupid/malicious elites that get cheaper labor at the expense of society as a whole.
There's no point in directing rage at women (or most men). Most people don't have self-awareness to the extent that it's useful to get angry at them. This was a deliberate act of psychological warfare enacted through media-driven programming, and you can't really fix this without completely changing the economic and media environment.
Can you give me one example of a 2FA implementation that would work? Where nobody in the login chain can know your identity, but you can still prove you're 18? Every commercial 2FA app I know is intrinsically linked to verifying a known identity, so they do not provide anonymous verification.
The identity is known at some level, yes. There are actually 2 sides to this.
The identity-verifying service doesn't need to know what websites/services you're accessing. It just needs to verify you once, and then provide some seed for One-Time-Passwords.
A website/service that needs age-authorization doesn't need to know precisely who accesses the site. It just needs to know a Pass/Fail based on a one-time-password-generated key.
If it's done correctly then:
- ID-verifier doesn't know what you're doing with your ID
- Service-needing-ID doesn't know your ID directly, just whether it's verified or not.
So yeah, you can do this in a privacy-respecting way. It's ultimately not any more difficult than setting up an account with Google and using your Google login on a 3rd party website. (Google probably does track you across sites via their login, but that's not because they have to, it's because they are creepy fucks).
Now is that theoretically game-able? Yeah, any system can be gamed. Credit cards can be gamed, physical IDs can be stolen or faked, photos / biometrics can definitely be faked. There's no 100% system.
Women don't belong in government or in positions of authority over men generally.
However, there's no better person to rebuke a woman than another woman.
There are actually ways to verify identity without disclosing identity in any uniquely identifiable way. It's what basically every 2FA app does, so this isn't some obscure or unfamiliar technology.
Since this is possible to do, yet it is never proposed or required whenever discussing age verification online, it's fair to characterize all of these efforts as an attempt to deliberately strip anonymity (for tyrannical purposes).
The precise actors in question are kind of irrelevant to the point here. The GayRaceCommunistZOG dialectic is all about creating, "Heads I win, Tails you lose" situations and this is no better. Either unrestricted access to hardcore porn for minors, or tyrannical speech-control across the entire internet.
Those aren't the only options.
TBH I don't really trust anything either side says about the conflict so far and there's really no concern from me so long as the US isn't drawn into the conflict (any more than we already are).
At a practical level, smuggling drones into a country as big as Iran sounds like an easy task if you have access to the 24/7 live intel provided by the US military. Drones are small AF and if you have them partially disassembled it'd be really easy to bring them in across some part of the border somewhere. This type of op just takes patience to pull off. I imagine Israel and/or China already has similar ops ready to go inside the US.
It will probably be bigger, since they can utilize a lot more technology to procedurally develop it.
I suspect that a lot of dialogue trees are now being AI-written, and possibly AI-voiced.
I don't want to make apologies for it, but a lot of things will go through a price bump because of the inflation we've seen since 2020. The value of the dollar dropped by more than half in that time frame. Almost everything eventually will price bump to catch up with it.
This is definitely not an 88yo woman's photo. However, women might use 20yo photos of themselves.
Although personally I'd just say she's lying about her age so she can pretend for Holo-bux.
Women naturally understand that these technologies undermine their social status / power and want to proactively ban them.
Like a world where men went around banning all the sewing machines, washing machines, vacuums, microwaves, etc.
Ending the mandate that TSA requires all passengers to remove their shoes would probably cut down on the TSA lines by 50%, just by itself