Pretty much the entire Western legal system regarding women right now is "before we rule, how does she feel about it?" Woman is pregnant and wants the baby? The baby's death is a murder. She doesn't want the baby? Preventing her from having the baby vivisected and hoovered out is a crime. Woman signed a contract? Does she want to honor it? If yes, then the other party will be held to every jot and tittle. If no, then the contract is null and void, and worth only the paper it's printed on.
His foreign queen didn't even put two-&-two together about the unsolicited home abortion until he went back the second time to finger her again under sedation.
Now let the scumbags in the courts give the same penalties to women that don't have consent from men to commit abortions and give men default custody first if kept.
At the High Court in Glasgow Lord Colbeck sentenced Stephen Doohan to 10 years and 6 months imprisonment after the offender pled guilty to assault to injury, sexual assault and procuring an abortion.
Can I ask why you are posting this? I have a few thoughts, first injecting drugs into someone without their consent should be illegal. Secondly, I think abortion should be illegal. Third, if the point is to show the left is hypocritical about abortion this doesn't do that.
The guy wasn't charged with murder or manslaughter so the baby isn't being treated as a person. I don't know what sentences are for poisoning cases in general so I don't know if this sentence is unusual or greater than normal.
I don't know anything about the Scottish court system to know if the sentencing is fair. I'll have to take your word on it.
I don't think this shows a hypocrisy on the leftist view of being pro-abortion. There wasn't any aspect of the baby's personhood being brought up, and the guy wasn't charged with murder or manslaughter.
The only way I ever compromise on abortion includes a man to abort all ownership and responsibility during a similar amount of time as the woman would have to decide.
"Stephen Doohan, at a preliminary hearing on 16 May 2025, you pled guilty to two charges arising out of assaults carried out by you.
Firstly, to assaulting and sexually assaulting your then partner by depositing misoprostol into her vagina and thus causing her to abort her unborn child to her injury, that offence being aggravated by the abuse of your then partner. Secondly, to depositing the misoprostol with the intent to cause her to abort, and to causing her to abort, that offence being similarly aggravated.
Yeah, there was no explicit mention of the rights of the fetus or future child.
But there is still Schrodinger's victim that he was sentenced to 14 years initially for the home abortion because of the lifetime of anguish an abortion leaves imprinted on the mother.
Without a hint of irony.
It's also mildly interesting that the first sentence in the document has him pleading guilty to a third component of "procuring an abortion" in addition to assault & sexual assault. Though later on that component gets left out entirely when they default back to talking about two charges plead guilty too.
Later on in the sentencing decision, the judge implies that consideration was made for allegations of domestic abuse were rolled into his sentence though that wasn't part of the plea deal.
The judge also sounded like a real cunt.
The judge sentenced him to 14 years, but it got reduced to 10 years & 6 months automatically because of legislation around the guilty plea. Which still made the judge butthurt.
It didn't sound like he got any credit for time served.
The judge acknowledged then completely ignored the fact that he was a first time offender with a community service record and character references vouching on his behalf.
The judge admitted to bumping him from a low-risk to a medium-risk offender solely on the fact that he was 33 years old.
They also ignored sentencing provisions that required them to choose any non-prison alternatives for a first-time offender, declaring they had "no choice" but to incarcerate him immediately for 14 years.
Reading comprehension doesn't seem to be your strong suit. That man almost killed a woman using drugs he stole from his place of employment. That man deserves more time, and losing all his medical credentials, with black listing.
You comment like you support his evil actions, to which I say I would wish worse on you.
The "Morning After Pill" is literally two off-the-shelf standard birth control pills taped together then sold at a 100x markup to anxious whores.
The therapeutic window for Plan B is only 72 hours after coitus (ie. Its mechanism of action is designed to prevent implantation of the fertilized ovum in the uterine lining, not expel a many weeks old fetus.
In other words, by the time his Ibiza sidepiece informed him she was pregnant, the Morning After Pill was already weeks and weeks too late.
Reading the sentencing judgment, the accused seemed to have some medical knowledge as he appeared to be a paramedic/ EMT working for the Scotland Ambulance Service. We know this because the transcript informs us that his foreign mistress called his employer trying to get him fired like a proper spurned crazy bitch instead of going to the police believing she was sexually assaulted. It was the Ambulance Service in turn that started the investigation and reported it to the authorities.
The transcript also talked about the insane medical confidentiality digital logging, as they were able to go back in his user logs to see he reviewed the Misoprostol abortion drug product monograph on the day she told him about the pregnancy.
The misoprostol drug he ended up using is applied locally to the cervix area inside the vagina. It's traditionally used to artificially induce labour in full-term pregnant women by starting the process hormonally to get the closed cervix to widen and open the birth canal.
It's usually supplied as a hormone-impregnated paper strip though. It is available in pill form as well, but the pills are more designed to work on gut lining to prevent stomach ulcers.
It's somewhat interesting that he decided to MacGiver it by using white pills he had to crush manually and put into solution to load into a syringe. Despite his medical background and presumable access to drugs and hospital supplies.
I suppose in the end the stomach pill version of the labour induction drugs was all he could get his hands on without suspicion without wandering into the Labour & Delivery ward and stealing what he needed.
Schrödinger’s baby: it’s a wonderful life worth protecting if the mother wants the child and a parasitic clump of cells if she doesn’t.
Western legal systems support the idea that women decide on an arbitrary, case-by-case basis what's considered human life or not.
Feminist law: Heads they win, tails you lose.
Pretty much the entire Western legal system regarding women right now is "before we rule, how does she feel about it?" Woman is pregnant and wants the baby? The baby's death is a murder. She doesn't want the baby? Preventing her from having the baby vivisected and hoovered out is a crime. Woman signed a contract? Does she want to honor it? If yes, then the other party will be held to every jot and tittle. If no, then the contract is null and void, and worth only the paper it's printed on.
Corollary: Men who acquiesce to whatever women demand are also a parasitic clump of cells.
He was credentialed. That's how he stole the drugs. Perhaps read the article.
His foreign queen didn't even put two-&-two together about the unsolicited home abortion until he went back the second time to finger her again under sedation.
He was coerced to do so under threat of slavery.
Now let the scumbags in the courts give the same penalties to women that don't have consent from men to commit abortions and give men default custody first if kept.
>10 year sentence
I guess the emphasis was meant to be on "almost."
He put the abortion drug into her vagina. Which she was content with at the time because she thought it was a toy
Yeah, that's a little different from "she went to a doctor and recieved a medication / had a procedure done".
That's an abortion roofie.
It's the man's money on the line, if women are allowed to kill babies then why can't a man?
It's very clear most of the commenters didn't read the article, let alone all the way to the bottom.
Can I ask why you are posting this? I have a few thoughts, first injecting drugs into someone without their consent should be illegal. Secondly, I think abortion should be illegal. Third, if the point is to show the left is hypocritical about abortion this doesn't do that.
The guy wasn't charged with murder or manslaughter so the baby isn't being treated as a person. I don't know what sentences are for poisoning cases in general so I don't know if this sentence is unusual or greater than normal.
the left is hypocritical about abortion.
People have murdered and not got ten years in Scotland.
I don't know anything about the Scottish court system to know if the sentencing is fair. I'll have to take your word on it.
I don't think this shows a hypocrisy on the leftist view of being pro-abortion. There wasn't any aspect of the baby's personhood being brought up, and the guy wasn't charged with murder or manslaughter.
It's ten years for financial self defense.
Dude, he was under threat of having everything he owned stolen from him via child support, that's the sort of shit that justifies any action.
No it doesn't. And it's a love child. If you don't want kids, don't fuck outside your marriage
There's a difference between not wanting a child and not wanting to be robbed by some selfish bitch.
Again then don't raw dog a foreigner outside your marriage
Marriage means nothing, the bitch can just leave and rob me that way and I'd be left with no other options but to kill the bitch
Oh no, are you a regular troll or are you that pajeet that post pictures of dead women and Brooke Shields
Neither, I'm the only sane man on this website.
On the plus side, 10 years is less than 18+ years lol
Heyoo 👏
Wait what, how does that work?
The only way I ever compromise on abortion includes a man to abort all ownership and responsibility during a similar amount of time as the woman would have to decide.
Digitally meaning with his fingers, correct?
Haha you’re probably right. I guess I should have thought of that I deal with legalese all the time, but not regarding crimes.
Probably... but technically, could also be with his toes.
OI, YE AINTNNEVA ERD A CYBASEX, THEN, MATE?
Fingers. Your fingers are digits.
It just gets worse from there.
Yeah, there was no explicit mention of the rights of the fetus or future child.
But there is still Schrodinger's victim that he was sentenced to 14 years initially for the home abortion because of the lifetime of anguish an abortion leaves imprinted on the mother.
Without a hint of irony.
It's also mildly interesting that the first sentence in the document has him pleading guilty to a third component of "procuring an abortion" in addition to assault & sexual assault. Though later on that component gets left out entirely when they default back to talking about two charges plead guilty too.
Later on in the sentencing decision, the judge implies that consideration was made for allegations of domestic abuse were rolled into his sentence though that wasn't part of the plea deal.
The judge also sounded like a real cunt.
The judge sentenced him to 14 years, but it got reduced to 10 years & 6 months automatically because of legislation around the guilty plea. Which still made the judge butthurt.
It didn't sound like he got any credit for time served.
The judge acknowledged then completely ignored the fact that he was a first time offender with a community service record and character references vouching on his behalf.
The judge admitted to bumping him from a low-risk to a medium-risk offender solely on the fact that he was 33 years old.
They also ignored sentencing provisions that required them to choose any non-prison alternatives for a first-time offender, declaring they had "no choice" but to incarcerate him immediately for 14 years.
Reading comprehension doesn't seem to be your strong suit. That man almost killed a woman using drugs he stole from his place of employment. That man deserves more time, and losing all his medical credentials, with black listing.
You comment like you support his evil actions, to which I say I would wish worse on you.
The "Morning After Pill" is literally two off-the-shelf standard birth control pills taped together then sold at a 100x markup to anxious whores.
The therapeutic window for Plan B is only 72 hours after coitus (ie. Its mechanism of action is designed to prevent implantation of the fertilized ovum in the uterine lining, not expel a many weeks old fetus.
In other words, by the time his Ibiza sidepiece informed him she was pregnant, the Morning After Pill was already weeks and weeks too late.
Reading the sentencing judgment, the accused seemed to have some medical knowledge as he appeared to be a paramedic/ EMT working for the Scotland Ambulance Service. We know this because the transcript informs us that his foreign mistress called his employer trying to get him fired like a proper spurned crazy bitch instead of going to the police believing she was sexually assaulted. It was the Ambulance Service in turn that started the investigation and reported it to the authorities.
The transcript also talked about the insane medical confidentiality digital logging, as they were able to go back in his user logs to see he reviewed the Misoprostol abortion drug product monograph on the day she told him about the pregnancy.
The misoprostol drug he ended up using is applied locally to the cervix area inside the vagina. It's traditionally used to artificially induce labour in full-term pregnant women by starting the process hormonally to get the closed cervix to widen and open the birth canal.
It's usually supplied as a hormone-impregnated paper strip though. It is available in pill form as well, but the pills are more designed to work on gut lining to prevent stomach ulcers.
It's somewhat interesting that he decided to MacGiver it by using white pills he had to crush manually and put into solution to load into a syringe. Despite his medical background and presumable access to drugs and hospital supplies.
I suppose in the end the stomach pill version of the labour induction drugs was all he could get his hands on without suspicion without wandering into the Labour & Delivery ward and stealing what he needed.