23
mharmless 23 points ago +23 / -0

I was suspended for tweeting:

Homosexuals are between one and five percent of the population, yet they make up nine percent of the child sexual offenders. They are therefore two to eight times as likely to be pedophiles as the straight population. https://t.co/IJKbLWb35j

After a week in the appeal bucket, I deleted it, had to wait a day on top of it. Then I tweeted:

@elonmusk Linking to a study on pubmed showing that homosexuals have a greater proportion of pedophiles resulted in my account being suspended. The appeal sat for a week, gave up and deleted it, and then I still got silenced for another day to boot. The process is the punishment.

This INSTANTLY resulted in a 7-day suspension.

3
mharmless 3 points ago +3 / -0

This happened early am yesterday, the appeal is still pending. The faggot incident was a few weeks back. I didn't even have a twitter before Musk.

6
mharmless 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thanks for the recommendation. This was already sitting in my library, and has now been bumped to the top.

2
mharmless 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am currently locked out of twitter for this:

@SteveBenedict17 @MiaCathell @MattWalshBlog Homosexuals are between one and five percent of the population, yet they make up nine percent of the child sexual offenders. They are therefore two to eight times as likely to be pedophiles as the straight population.

They marked it as 'hateful conduct', promoting violence against a protected class. Appeal still in process.

Last lock was using the word 'faggot'. I called the appeal team faggots, linked to other tweets by faggots using the word faggot and said that was proof it was only an insult not a call to violence. Expected a ban for calling the appeal team faggots, but just had to delete the tweet still. I then went right back to the thread in question and called for making homosexuality illegal and then punishing homosexuals to the full extent of the law, up to and including lawful state executions. This tweet was allowed to stay up, as opposed to calling somebody a faggot.

The current situation is... weird.

2
mharmless 2 points ago +2 / -0

a normal person who voted for trump is the same as a stormfront white supremacist

How it started vs how it's going

6
mharmless 6 points ago +6 / -0

Today I got banned from JusticeServed, a community I've never used, for a comment on Conservative. Edited my comment to include the fact this happened, and the Conservative mods deleted my comment entirely in response.

They conserve nothing. As usual. Need to look... farther right...

The comment in question was pointing out that multiple blue states effectively legalized spreading HIV intentionally. Why? Aren't they proud of that? Apparently not.

8
mharmless 8 points ago +8 / -0

This right here. All I wanted to do was talk about video games in peace. They had my passive support. Sure, get married.

They wont. fucking. quit. Further and further. Going after kids with a smile on their face and a spring in their step...

Live and let live is off the table? Fine. I'm sure not going to be the one to 'go away', faggots.

6
mharmless 6 points ago +6 / -0

Personally, I prefer to roll Mohawk for the 50% chance to proc a second scalp every time you scalp. Really speeds up the hairsmithing advancement.

by Vebent
4
mharmless 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wait some people don't have a shower gun?

Wake up people, that's when you're the most vulnerable!

1
mharmless 1 point ago +1 / -0

I read somewhere in my ass that you can nerve staple Hufflepuffs in this one.

5
mharmless 5 points ago +5 / -0

Now you fucking get it!

Do ten hail Floyds and 100 estrogen pills and all will be forgiven.

5
mharmless 5 points ago +5 / -0

The tags are a light color because they are user made tags. Only the user who applied that will see it, unless an absolutely ludicrous amount of people apply the same tags.

I use user tags to mark games I've bought on other storefronts, 'Woke Garbage' for anything that looks cool but is really a trap, as well as a personal crusade to put 'Male Protagonist' on anything where you can make your own character (the same way Female Protagonist appears on all of em). I've yet to see any of those tags in the wild.

7
mharmless 7 points ago +7 / -0

The price of one lightbulb is extraordinarily high, but if you're willing to buy in bulk the marginal cost increase is vanishingly small.

4
mharmless 4 points ago +4 / -0

Chris Coleman, the teacher who stood up to say the parents should have no say, should be hung by the neck until dead. In minecraft. And any other rule 2 safe locations.

4
mharmless 4 points ago +4 / -0

I won't dispute any of the above, but I would like to point out that the violence is the focus and it isn't really touched upon above. I went into the theater expecting over the top campy violence with Christmas themed one liners, and that is exactly what I got. Bad guys murdered with candy canes, snow blowers, ice skates, light strings, you name it.

Further, the only 'unequivocally good' adult character, the black wife referenced above, assists Santa with a captured rifle that she knows how to use because she went hunting with her dad as a kid, which was to me a pro-second amendment message coming from the character I least expected.

This was my first theater trip since the scamdemic, and I not only had no regrets, but I went back again and watched it with a second group of friends and family. And I enjoyed it just as much the second time, despite the complete lack of surprise.

This movie will be joining Sharknado in my guilty pleasure rewatch list.

10
mharmless 10 points ago +10 / -0

Not even saying that's correct, or that I want that

I will say that.

10
mharmless 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's not really like/dislike, for me at least. I think he's nuts, not intentionally disruptive. And for reasons that are probably obvious, I've gotten quite distrustful of banning/censorship.

A feature that let us automatically collapse specific users would be nice. Then his rants could be skipped over easily by default while still being easily popped open if you want to take a quick look at the vagina monologues for a laugh.

3
mharmless 3 points ago +4 / -1

No, you wouldn't have.

And that's a good thing.

Ideally you need to do things like that outside the view of cameras and witnesses, otherwise you only get to do it once. Theoretically that is. This is not rule 2 related advice, I am not an internet janitor.

Edit: I see the parent got deleted. I did not report you sir, I am not a snitch.

8
mharmless 8 points ago +8 / -0

Is this real life?

More and more I suspect that I'm actually in hell, suffering what I deserve.

3
mharmless 3 points ago +3 / -0

No sir, trespass now means two years or more rotting in a cell while you await trial. Perfectly just and proper.

12
mharmless 12 points ago +12 / -0

I'm at the point where I'd like to see homosexuality criminalized again. And I used to be a "live and let live" type of guy.

It may be a case of social activists ruining everything for the average queer guy, but too fucking bad, you goddamned pansies. My tolerance is gone, and I'm not alone.

A-fucking-men. I supported gay marriage and worked in k12. I got to watch in real time as the trans-cancer metastasized in just five more years. My tolerance is gone, the cancer must be incinerated, and I don't care how many faggots get burned by proximity.

14
mharmless 14 points ago +14 / -0

There are 17 species of cottontail rabbits. Each can interbreed with the other 16, and as far as I know all combinations are viable. But this isn't considered a barrier to being considered different species because they aren't considered to do so 'often'. The 'can interbreed' definition is absolutely out of fashion, it interferes with creating new barriers to construction and industrialization.

Neandertal were fucked out of existence and yet no scientist seriously argues they are the species as us. Yet if we Jurassic Parked a few thousand of them up tomorrow, how many years do you think it would take before calling them a different species became a hate crime and got Ye kicked off twitter?

If we applied the same standards to humans, we'd probably have a few dozen species. I mean, christ, the 'unlikely to breed often' metric would let you make a case that Plenty of Fish users are a different species from Grindr users despite a complete overlap of territory and diet.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›