Homosexuals are between one and five percent of the population, yet they make up nine percent of the child sexual offenders. They are therefore two to eight times as likely to be pedophiles as the straight population. https://t.co/IJKbLWb35j
After a week in the appeal bucket, I deleted it, had to wait a day on top of it. Then I tweeted:
@elonmusk Linking to a study on pubmed showing that homosexuals have a greater proportion of pedophiles resulted in my account being suspended. The appeal sat for a week, gave up and deleted it, and then I still got silenced for another day to boot. The process is the punishment.
Oh I'm not doing that at all. This was in response to a raging faggot mad that people were talking about fags abusing kids. I posted this specifically to piss on him. Pissing on these degenerates wherever possible is important, so that normies don't view them as unopposed and therefore correct.
As opposed to what? Acting like homosexuals abusing children at elevated rates is normal and fine? Pretending they can actually be women? You certainly ought to understand by now that any opposition to these people makes you a mortal enemy, so why would you pull punches?
Conservatives have conserved nothing, and this is why.
I don't get it. Most child sex offenders are men, but like 30% of the crimes are committed against boys. So the math doesn't work out unless you consider homosexual pedophiles to be "just pedophiles" which is what the left does.
Actually they tend to argue there are no gay pedophiles because if they're pedophile that's an orientation and they can't be gay.
Going to level with you: it's a fruitless endeavor to have this conversation. It just ends up turning into two people, each with their minds already made up, getting mad at words on their screen.
I was suspended for tweeting:
After a week in the appeal bucket, I deleted it, had to wait a day on top of it. Then I tweeted:
This INSTANTLY resulted in a 7-day suspension.
Why you would expect anything resembling a proper discussion on Twitter is your own problem.
Oh I'm not doing that at all. This was in response to a raging faggot mad that people were talking about fags abusing kids. I posted this specifically to piss on him. Pissing on these degenerates wherever possible is important, so that normies don't view them as unopposed and therefore correct.
BBB - Bring Back Bullying.
You know they'd probably enjoy it if you did it for real?
>I was deliberately antagonistic to people on the internet to convince the normies I am right
Why do I even bother?
As opposed to what? Acting like homosexuals abusing children at elevated rates is normal and fine? Pretending they can actually be women? You certainly ought to understand by now that any opposition to these people makes you a mortal enemy, so why would you pull punches?
Conservatives have conserved nothing, and this is why.
No fight in 'em.
I don't get it. Most child sex offenders are men, but like 30% of the crimes are committed against boys. So the math doesn't work out unless you consider homosexual pedophiles to be "just pedophiles" which is what the left does.
Actually they tend to argue there are no gay pedophiles because if they're pedophile that's an orientation and they can't be gay.
Does 13 do 51 also confuse you then? I'm not sure that I have the space to explain the concept of per capita incidence rates properly.
Going to level with you: it's a fruitless endeavor to have this conversation. It just ends up turning into two people, each with their minds already made up, getting mad at words on their screen.
Lesbians?
Their rate of child abuse is ridiculously high. 23%.