This right here. All I wanted to do was talk about video games in peace. They had my passive support. Sure, get married.
They wont. fucking. quit. Further and further. Going after kids with a smile on their face and a spring in their step...
Live and let live is off the table? Fine. I'm sure not going to be the one to 'go away', faggots.
The tags are a light color because they are user made tags. Only the user who applied that will see it, unless an absolutely ludicrous amount of people apply the same tags.
I use user tags to mark games I've bought on other storefronts, 'Woke Garbage' for anything that looks cool but is really a trap, as well as a personal crusade to put 'Male Protagonist' on anything where you can make your own character (the same way Female Protagonist appears on all of em). I've yet to see any of those tags in the wild.
I won't dispute any of the above, but I would like to point out that the violence is the focus and it isn't really touched upon above. I went into the theater expecting over the top campy violence with Christmas themed one liners, and that is exactly what I got. Bad guys murdered with candy canes, snow blowers, ice skates, light strings, you name it.
Further, the only 'unequivocally good' adult character, the black wife referenced above, assists Santa with a captured rifle that she knows how to use because she went hunting with her dad as a kid, which was to me a pro-second amendment message coming from the character I least expected.
This was my first theater trip since the scamdemic, and I not only had no regrets, but I went back again and watched it with a second group of friends and family. And I enjoyed it just as much the second time, despite the complete lack of surprise.
This movie will be joining Sharknado in my guilty pleasure rewatch list.
It's not really like/dislike, for me at least. I think he's nuts, not intentionally disruptive. And for reasons that are probably obvious, I've gotten quite distrustful of banning/censorship.
A feature that let us automatically collapse specific users would be nice. Then his rants could be skipped over easily by default while still being easily popped open if you want to take a quick look at the vagina monologues for a laugh.
No, you wouldn't have.
And that's a good thing.
Ideally you need to do things like that outside the view of cameras and witnesses, otherwise you only get to do it once. Theoretically that is. This is not rule 2 related advice, I am not an internet janitor.
Edit: I see the parent got deleted. I did not report you sir, I am not a snitch.
I'm at the point where I'd like to see homosexuality criminalized again. And I used to be a "live and let live" type of guy.
It may be a case of social activists ruining everything for the average queer guy, but too fucking bad, you goddamned pansies. My tolerance is gone, and I'm not alone.
A-fucking-men. I supported gay marriage and worked in k12. I got to watch in real time as the trans-cancer metastasized in just five more years. My tolerance is gone, the cancer must be incinerated, and I don't care how many faggots get burned by proximity.
There are 17 species of cottontail rabbits. Each can interbreed with the other 16, and as far as I know all combinations are viable. But this isn't considered a barrier to being considered different species because they aren't considered to do so 'often'. The 'can interbreed' definition is absolutely out of fashion, it interferes with creating new barriers to construction and industrialization.
Neandertal were fucked out of existence and yet no scientist seriously argues they are the species as us. Yet if we Jurassic Parked a few thousand of them up tomorrow, how many years do you think it would take before calling them a different species became a hate crime and got Ye kicked off twitter?
If we applied the same standards to humans, we'd probably have a few dozen species. I mean, christ, the 'unlikely to breed often' metric would let you make a case that Plenty of Fish users are a different species from Grindr users despite a complete overlap of territory and diet.
but the law doesn't work that way.
It kind of does. See, leftists are masters of wordspells. We passed laws to require vaccines because they stop the spread of horrible diseases. One wave of your magic dictionary and POOF, any old gene therapy can be a vaccine!
Racist laws protecting whites, too? POOF I've magically redefined racism to explicitly exclude whites without tiny hats!
Mentally ill men aren't getting enough attention? POOF! Now they're women!
Went to check on this, up seeing the same thing. Clicking on the link takes you to a bing search, where every result is using homicide or murder, while the top banner says the same thing 'guilty of parade crash'. Fuck, even the wikipedia sidebar on the right calls it the 'parade attack', communicating intention.
I do not believe this wording was chosen programmatically. A human did this, intentionally.
Today I got banned from JusticeServed, a community I've never used, for a comment on Conservative. Edited my comment to include the fact this happened, and the Conservative mods deleted my comment entirely in response.
They conserve nothing. As usual. Need to look... farther right...
The comment in question was pointing out that multiple blue states effectively legalized spreading HIV intentionally. Why? Aren't they proud of that? Apparently not.