1
lapalapa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does a sitting President ever hire a law firm while in office? Maybe this is the proper way these things are handled. Besides, rather than just the face of the guy, it's the face of the President, so maybe it's relevant.

3
lapalapa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Surely I can't plaster some public person's face onto my cereal brand without permission. This doesn't sound to me like the government being egregious.

3
lapalapa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Spanish/ Italian elf

The japanese sometimes draw dark elves with brownish skin for the sake of exotic sex appeal.

4
lapalapa 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can appreciate the animation, but sadly it's at the service of an uninspired and unoriginal short.

6
lapalapa 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fake woke "Christian" arguments don't bother me. Those are easy to spot. They don't fool anyone.

What bothers me are right wing political influencers grifting as Christians. Those lead people astray.

21
lapalapa 21 points ago +21 / -0

That may be wishful thinking. Many people hate the rich. Who the rich person is often matters less than being able to hate someone. Most convicts are sociopaths.

Would Trump even go to a common prison? Wouldn't he go to one of those luxury ones for billionaires?

by Lethn
1
lapalapa 1 point ago +1 / -0

You already know you're shooting at the cursor in the center of the screen, so ADS is just an annoyance that adds a step and messes with visibility.

You could not have a cursor on the screen to force its utility, but why bother? One wants to aim and shoot, not aim, bring up some nonsense to your face, retarget and shoot. I'd rather that gameplay additions be placed on improving movement rather than aiming nonsense than makes gameplay more sluggish.

Then again I'm more of a double jump & dash kind of guy.

17
lapalapa 17 points ago +17 / -0

What's a tongue clicker scammer?

6
lapalapa 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't consume content that just makes you angry. It's not healthy and it doesn't improve your life.

2
lapalapa 2 points ago +2 / -0

🤷 Maybe you have a point.

It would have to be challenged in court.

1
lapalapa 1 point ago +1 / -0

who says they will peek at and use anything

May use. They may not. Any use complaint would have to be proven, which would be extremely hard.

2
lapalapa 2 points ago +2 / -0

You'd be hard pressed to prove that any one piece of art was used as training data in their neural network crap.

3
lapalapa 3 points ago +3 / -0

I bet you they knew and did it anyway as some kind of postmodern rebellion nonsense.

3
lapalapa 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's fire without gravity, not in actual space vacuum.

4
lapalapa 4 points ago +4 / -0

Brand recognition and desperation.

When was the last time you heard of new, exciting Netflix content? They're dying a slow death. They have to Metaverse their Facebook or die. Expect them to try increasingly wilder bets.

by Lethn
2
lapalapa 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did that once for GTA V on the ps3. It was a bad call.

by Lethn
5
lapalapa 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's your fault for playing AAA.

The indie scene continues to grow. There's been a whole lot of great shooters in the last couple of years. I'm talking singleplayer.

1
lapalapa 1 point ago +1 / -0

What kind of secession requires consent of the ruler?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›