she doesn't seem to be the type to make money off their looks
Coomers just wanna coom dude, they'll take any path open to them
That's weird, I thought comparing medical tyranny and progressive witch hunts to the holocaust and comparing dictators to nazis was insensitive and bad and antisemitic?
I guess I should know by now that it's okay when they do it.
Yes and no. A lot of them know it's happening on some level and tacitly support it, but a scary amount of people who don't want elections stolen have simply internalized the idea that 'Questioning elections = wrongthink'. Normies hate to do wrongthink, it makes them feel very, very scared, so they will force themselves to live in ignorance.
Their identities were thought to be incompatible with national defence, international security, and arms control work
They are completely incompatible with those things.
Not because of who they want to fuck, but because of all the garbage self-identified "LGBTQ+" are overwhelmingly likely to believe, and the poor integrity and impulse control and generally bad character they're overwhelmingly likely to have.
Believing that election fraud is real?
A-as a concept?? Do you think the idea of election fraud is a dumb conspiracy theory? The possibility of its existence is magically negated by believing hard enough in what Daddy Democrat tells you?
The existence of people this stupid truly frightens me.
Yes, they're delusional hypocrites.
Yes, this an information war and they are dishonest at all times.
Yes, it's easy to be desensitized to violence when it happens regularly, and when your enemy wishes to use it against you.
Yes, many of them would laugh at our suffering.
But we should not be laughing at this tragedy, even indirectly. If we do, we will lose ourselves. We will lose ground we have gained.
Do not cave into their demands or legitimize their demented ideology because of something a murderous psychopath did, but let's not be ghoulish.
If you keep giving to someone who only takes, they will forever take from you and give you nothing. That is how incentives work.
'Treat people well so they'll treat you well' sounds great and all but it assumes you're dealing with people who are capable of decency and good faith. Sometimes you have to acknowledge that you are not, and progress from carrot to stick.
They suggest this because they only intend for it to be used against us, but I suspect they don't even think about the dangerous precedent they're setting and how it could be used against them if the balance of power changes.
I don't want this. This is an abominable form of censorship. This is exactly the 'stochastic terrorism' (bullshit term btw) they accuse us of.
But if we're going to have it, I eagerly look forward to it being used against them. As soon as the right gets its head out of its ass and realizes it needs to fight fire with fire.
I feel like we're only about a year or so away, maybe less, from being told that you're racist and sexist if you don't like the MCU.
Even if they haven't said that exactly, we're already there. Having standards at all is racist and sexist, whether you're a creator or a consumer
Ah yes, everything is racist, including blockbuster film criticism.
Funny thing is, he thinks he's safely on the grifting side but asians are being thrown in the 'privilege' pit with whites more often than not now. Their status changes according to how useful they are at any given time, but this will come back to bite him eventually
Yeah, because those who refused the vaccine haven't been subjected to prolonged stress or anything...
I guarantee that in 50 years, white women will have the same or better standard of life relative to now.
I doubt it. They'll have a much better standard of life than men but the policies they vote for/implement will make life worse for everyone, including them.
They might think their standard of life is better, because they're always chasing false ideals.
Because, left to women's indoctrination, all the kids are doomed. White or not.
Left to progressive indoctrination, a large amount of which does come from women, all the kids are doomed. I agree.
There is no racial solidarity, Team Women are playing for keeps.
There is racial solidarity among every race that is not white.
Women do have a huge ingroup preference and they clamor for policies which benefit them at the expense of men, children, and countries themselves. That is true.
None of this proves that racial nationalism doesn't work. Reversing the damage done by feminism is vital and so is encouraging white people to have a shared identity and a healthy self interest in a world where cohesive identity groups are aligning against them.
You're right about women to a degree but your rigidity blinds you to other, very real, concerns. You spend an inestimable amount of mental energy on combative attempts to disprove any notion that doesn't paint women as the sole perpetrators of society's problems. That said, some people here needle you on a daily basis, which is dumb, and I've noticed myself going out of my way to argue with you a few times.
Anyway, my point being: women, specifically feminists, are a major problem. But more than one thing can be true.
This is proof racial nationalism doesn't work.
What racial nationalism?
Correct me if I'm wrong but it feels like you're using this to say 'Take that, Conpro! Your politics are wrong and mine are right!'
But how does this prove that racial nationalism doesn't work? Nobody ran on a racial nationalist platform. It isn't even part of mainstream consciousness, unless you count anti-CRT and anti-affirmative action efforts. Or Democrats calling everything white supremacy.
I'm genuinely curious, what specific tenet of racial nationalism do you think these numbers refute? Because we all agree the the leftist brainwashing of our kids needs to be stopped. That would be part of a racial nationalist agenda just like it's part of yours.
Identity politics is for leftist fags.
'All X are bad' is for fags and 'I'm oppressed because I'm Y, so I get to speak and you don't' is for fags, but examining culture is not. Culture is real and incredibly influential. Biology is a factor but people behave how they're taught to behave.
If you dismiss cultural differences as an issue you'll never fix anything because you won't even see what needs fixing.
Western culture has internalized the idea that 'being kind' is more important than making sensible decisions. This is a huge factor in the rapidly worsening problems we face as a society.
And many individual, voting humans don't see reality, they see narratives straight out of their favorite feel good movies. Look at the people with Ukraine flags in their bios and you will not see someone with opinions and feelings about a real world event, you will see someone avidly following the plot of a movie.
These people want to see someone like Fetterman 'beating the odds' and 'triumphing over adversity'. They expect reality to change to meet their expectations.
You must understand. In their eyes, being mentally impaired doesn't make him less qualified for the job. It makes him more qualified for the job.
(Or there was voter fraud. Likely a combination of both.)
Why should we assume it's a typo? We know they try to cheat.
And if it is a typo, why should we call it 'little' and let it slide? This shit is important, especially when everyone's so on edge about fraud already. It's their job to get it right.
I know, but we bear our share of responsibility for being cucked enough to worship them or let them spread so far.
Honestly it's normal not to strictly adhere to gender roles, it's fine (not always ideal, and it shouldn't be pushed so heavily) for men to have feminine tendencies and vice versa.
Why does it always manifest now as a need for validation? You can't just be a masculine woman or a feminine man or somewhere on that scale, you can't even have different moods at different times, you have to LITERALLY be changing your gender and you have to force everyone else to validate and reinforce it
It's taking a wholly internal identity process and trying to literally manifest it in reality. It's not healthy.
Among themselves they openly brag about the things they decry as antisemitic conspiracy theories here. It's a source of pride, which says a lot about the culture driving this insidious influence.
And they refuse to stop bragging about it even though it would be smart to. Probably makes them furious that we can read their own publications. Soon doing that will be antisemitic too.
Before you all start calling me 'stormcuck' I want to say, obviously, it's not all jews. But I do think there is a cultural tendency, just like the cultural tendency that produces all the 'gangstas' in black america, and white america's struggle with destructive ideologies like marxism, feminism etc
Thanks! Looks like a good resource.
I'll read it, if I can get it without being put in a database somewhere.
I looked at some snippets, and what I'm getting is: they see themselves as colonists rather than guests, so they work to culturally, politically and academically terraform their new homes to suit them better (basically weakening the cohesion of the host), and place themselves in positions of power, because they don't trust their hosts will treat them well?
In essence, unironically colonialism.
And obviously people object to it, so it becomes self-sabotage and a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If that's how it is... it's actually quite sad.
No people ignores their origin story.
A fantastic and poetic way to phrase it.
I'm still approaching the premise of justified expulsion as a hypothetical, I'm not saying it was justified or it wasn't. But the concept is easier to understand now.
(edit - well I'm still not clear on what kind of things they were supposedly doing to be expelled, but that seems like a longer conversation. At any rate, the psychological angle isn't as puzzling as it was)
Well cities are often cesspools so I can see how a group descended entirely from affluent urbanites could have a lot of negative, culturally entrenched baggage.
You say 'selected'. Do you mean in terms of genetics? Of course I'm willing to accept IQ being inherited genetically, and I'll even grant you 'neurotic', but I'm not sold on 'greedy' and 'manipulative' being hereditary traits (if that's what you meant).
I think of ingroup preference as something that most groups have, only it's beaten and shamed out of the ones that aren't allowed to have it. But it's very plausible that being kicked out a bunch of countries and developing a 'it's us against the world' mindset would kick it into overdrive.
But it's an interesting theory, thank you for sharing it.
'good citizen of the world' = globalist shill