And they should stay THE FUCK AWAY from our children. That is the central crux of the issue here.
Yes, 100%. They've chosen this hill to die on, they won't back down from it, so they're making it imperative to stop them.
Equally important, from a societal health perspective, is that they stop forcing everyone to validate them. I know free speech doesn't seem as immediately urgent as protecting kids from them, but on a broader scale it's still extremely important. A society can't function if it's chasing a ridiculous delusion, forcing everyone to take part in it and criminalizing anything that disagrees.
The fact that all of their arguments are semantic nonsense that don't actually say anything, but get lapped up and cheered on anyway, is a sign of how bad things are.
This is very sad. Self loathing is one of the pillars of society's decline. Many of these children will never find meaning or value in their lives, only fake activism and hedonism.
I can see humor in the last three panels, but it requires you to accept the stupid premise that trans people are as oppressed as they think they are.
The problem with comedy and stand up comedy in particular, in order to work it relies on widely understood truths, expectations and audience experiences. That's why leftist comedy doesn't usually work, it can't just fire off a couple of jokes that rely on audience understanding, it needs walls of text (literal or figurative) to explain its delusional, unreal context.
But this is simple at least. Since the Prevailing Narrative is trans people are oppressed and downtrodden, it can riff off that without much preamble. So it's funny? Sort of?
Still reads too much like bitching though. You can't do stand up comedy if you sound angry and tilted, that's the opposite of funny. Unless you want people laughing at you.
This is a confusing title. It sounds like they tried to invent a men's only vehicle and somehow failed by using parts invented by men.
That aside, it sickens me how readily they dispose of the truth (and the accomplishments of men) for feel good falsehoods. This, more than anything, is what will lead to the doom of civilization.
I don't see why it needs strict movement control and state allocated resources. I see it - the ideal version at least - as having everything within 15 minutes to eliminate the need for most inter-district travel. It doesn't have to involve the sort of hard control that these cunts want to take. Incentivize it, make it logistically convenient, and let people decide for themselves. I think it'd provide a lot of benefits.
Just because criminals and tyrants want to implement a warped and twisted version of something, doesn't mean a good version of that thing is impossible to achieve if it's voluntary and realistic in scale. And if it's built fresh instead of rammed into existing cities.
This isn't literally saying humanity will be wiped out in 5 years, it's that 'point of no return' thing they always fearmonger about. Of course, I have no doubt the 'point of no return' has changed to (Current Year+5), because it's not a worthwhile grift if there's no longer anything that can be done
Wait they actually were charged with a hate crime for beating up a white man?
'Hate crimes' are a fucking joke but having them enforced equally is good news.
Do I even need to ask if there's a quota for men on all boards too? Or is it completely fine to have boards made up completely of women?
It's never voluntary, though. And it can't be if you're turning existing cities into "15 minute cities."
No, they would need to be built from the ground up and we all know these fucks can't or don't want to build anything, only subvert and destroy.
In theory, having everything you need close by (including work) so you don't have to drive everywhere isn't a bad idea. In theory, it could ease the stress and time pressures of commuting and ease the financial pressures of owning and maintaining a car. In theory, it could help foster a strong sense of community identity.
I do not trust the globalist cunts to deliver this version of 15 minutes cities. They will of course be introducing the commie blocks you mention, with the bare minimum of living arrangements that keep the peasants oppressed and the elite rich and powerful.
But it's not a terrible idea if it's strictly voluntary and it's implemented by people who are intelligent and good.
I know this is for humor, not an actual indictment of 15 minute cities, but to play devil's advocate anyway:
A 15 minute city frankensteined together in a game that isn't designed or programmed to accommodate it says nothing about the validity of the real thing.
15 minute cities have downsides but they also have potential. They're a cool idea - if they're voluntary.
So obviously their next step will be to make child porn legal or create a loophole to prevent prosecution of the wrong people. Possibly a threshold where they can legally possess an amount of child porn, so the FBI can still frame inconvenient people with large amounts.
Then we'll be one horrible step closer to sex with children becoming legal.
“They’ll learn once they get to the real world.”
I used to think this before I saw what lengths they will go to to construct a false reality. We're dealing with a destructive, potential society-ending delusion that exists only to reinforce itself and be unquestionable. Many of its proponents are the stupidest, least competent people to ever exist, but I no longer underestimate them.
They are dangerous because they are stupid and they think their stupidity is the highest virtue. Intelligence, on the other hand, is a crime that must be eradicated at all costs.
“They’ll learn once they get to the real world.”
I used to think this before I saw what lengths they will go to to construct a false reality. We're dealing with a destructive, potential society-ending delusion that exists only to reinforce itself and be unquestionable. Many of its proponents are the stupidest, least competent people to ever exist, but I no longer underestimate them.
They are dangerous because they are stupid and they think their stupidity is the highest virtue. Intelligence, on the other hand, is a crime that must be eradicated at all costs.
“They’ll learn once they get to the real world.”
I used to think this before I saw what lengths they will go to to construct a false reality. We're dealing with a destructive, potential society-ending delusion that exists only to reinforce itself and be unquestionable. Many of its proponents are the stupidest, least competent people to ever exist, but I no longer underestimate them.
They are dangerous because they are stupid and they think their stupidity is the highest virtue. Intelligence, on the other hand, is a crime that must be eradicated at all costs.
Thank you. Yes, their behavior has been more disgusting than usual
maybe just make complete games to start with and you won't have to update them
Context please?
well yes, it's been obvious capeshit theater from the start. Nice of them to admit it
He always said he supports free speech within the bounds of the law. He's only doing what he always said he would.
It's still disgusting.
The only way forward for the heritage peoples of the west is the Jewish way of ultra nepotistic tribalism.
I never wanted to, but if other groups are doing it you have to adapt or die.
translation: they both see women as enemies, but excif acknowledges other enemies too. Imp has trouble doing that.
How many of those old Japanese people supported the very governments that fucked things up and were against the opposing parties that tried to fix things?
I don't know as much about Japan, but I know in the west propaganda has a huge role in this. The ruling class always do everything they can to establish the idea of their legitimacy and competence. These are everyday people, without a mind for politics and economics, that have been promised if they support society, society will support them. It's a contract of sorts and they've fulfilled their part of it, which is part of what makes it hard to change even if competent people were in charge.
Charity should be entirely voluntary, yes, but that doesn't mean I agree that old people should just die if they don't have resources. Maybe if the government didn't rob us of our income, tax us for our land, burden us with endless fees, devalue what we have left through inflation and otherwise meddle and make everything worse, private aged care would be affordable without handouts.
yeah that's an extremely good point. They want to be 'accepted' but they want to be protected from any criticism or jokes. They will never be truly accepted like that, they'll just have everyone too afraid to reject them. But they will be resented by everyone, even their so called allies, and their friendships will be entirely superficial. They will always know they are not really part of the gang.