Bombing countries unprovoked is now "peace through strength". No, it's war through aggression.
Trump's always said smack some country-bitches around to keep them in line.
Have you really been living under a rock? I've seen him say the things in your clips, but always in the context of avoiding conflict because the bad guys are afraid of "dying like a dog".
I always wondered how people like you could have a notion that he's an isolationist and I guess I got my answer: you're getting your news from clips.
Yes, that's what we're talking about, the midterms.
Either the President's party losing the midterms is some hard and fast rule of US democracy or it's the result of widespread cheating orchestrated to give us the illusion of democracy.
Given all that we've seen since Trump's 2016 preternatural win I'm putting my chips on the latter.
I think the other side always taking control after 2 years is part of the dog and pony show, the fake democracy.
The only time it didn't happen was Bush Jr at 80% approval rating, which is overcome-cheating levels of support, and he barely picked up any seats.
It's going to happen unless the elections get fixed real soon. Even if SAFE act is passed the cheating states will have it on appeal for this election and then they'll pass some law to neuter it.
Another possibility is that the people doing the old school propaganda didn't approve of the attack.
The Deep State wants forever war with Iran. They want the constant terrorism and need for U.S.S. Big Stick in the Gulf - sell fighters to Saudi, keep China out by us being there in force, test weapons on softer target than China or Russia.
Trump was supposed to be the moderate response to woke; fix the culture just by saying retarded things that piss off weak pussies, do a few populist things, and have a gold-plated Presidential library.
Instead lefties had to cross the lawfare rubicon and shoot his ear and now we get scorched-Earth Trump trying to do everything. But he's not smart and clever enough to fix the entire economy in 4 years, much less the whole world order.
edit: I'll be happy to be proven wrong if he does.
Deported illegals. They were living someplace, now those places are vacant.
Owner/bank sells them, other people with investment homes panic and try to sell while prices are still high, nobody buys because they expect prices to crash down.
In other words, it's a tragedy of the commons situation.
Nobody except a few crazies want to sign up for military knowing they'll likely die and if nobody signs up then all will die; volunteer army is almost entirely people who don't actually expect to die.
The most sensible choice for an individual is to avoid the military and that's why conscription is needed or the country is lost.
The problem here like everywhere in society now is no accountability. Nothing happens to the school admin when the school is shitty. Nothing happens to the teachers that teach their political ideology instead of educating. Nothing happens to the kids that fuck up.
If this school's funding was tied to performance then they'd be like get yo ass back into class and study dis sheeit. They'd hire 24/7 bodyguards for Urkle. Pink hair teachers would be champing at the bit to preach their hatred, but bite their tongue to get that bonus money.
Of course that would be unequal and racist, yet black schools current getting many times more money per student for things like replacing laptops they told the kids to destroy somehow is equal.
Vincent wasn't 'saving anything' for the return trip, so I think the idea the movie was trying for was that he would be able to do the mission but wouldn't live to return whereas a non-degenerate would eventually make it back alive.
Of course reality is he's already past his life expectancy and he's putting the mission at great risk entirely for his own selfishness, but you're not supposed to think about that.
Clearly you want them to be in the wrong for some reason, but there isn't actually any good reason to think that.
They should have done this, should have done that, should be perfect all the time. Like no, the dude is at fault. He brought the conflict, he resisted, he had a gun, he died.
Sans malice, there's nothing unreasonable about what happened.
Their examples are hilarious:
Grok: Jan 6 was a riot by people protesting certification of the election.
Wikipedia: a self-coup attack by Trump and his Trumpers. Reeee.
Grok: Britain First is a far-right party for national sovereignty.
Wikipedia: they're a fascist hate group. Oh and also they're racist and sexist and kick dogs.
Gee I wonder which one is reasonable and neutral, it's so hard to tell. How is this not satire? They're literally insane, their mind is broken.
Because they're too stupid to learn from history that they are the problem.
Hell they had a settlement in like Zambia or wherever hundreds of years ago they got run out of. They couldn't even rule over literal morons without being genocided.
It's not even a morally bad shooting. Dude instigated conflict, he had a gun, he resisted, and he was shot. High level view, nothing immoral.
Only thing that would make this morally bad is if we thought the officer purposely shot him out of malice. I don't see any evidence of that at all.
It's not like the guy was disarmed for 30+ seconds. Last time the shooting officer looked at the holster there was a gun in it, then the crazy guy appeared to reach for the holster.
Totally justified. There's simply not enough time to process "I know there was a gun there but is it still there?" Even if they train for this specific case it's just slowing their reaction down when it matters more and the gun is still there. And they don't need to train for it because: don't fight the cops especially when you have a gun and don't reach for your holster even if it's empty.
Pretty much can assume Google is doing everything for some nefarious reason.
Here's one: they can pollute other company's AIs that scrape youtube with stuff that Google had been censoring and are censoring from their own AI. If they relax the censor then other AIs start knowing all about niggers in the moon and whatnot and the other companies have to put some effort into making them work/family safe.
You're proving my point here. You think posting a few no-context clips is "backing up" what you said.
Because that's what you consider is evidence, that's where you're getting your ideas from.
"No stupid wars" isn't my standard it's Trump's. Trump I doubt thinks this is a stupid war or wouldn't have done it. It's like you think you're here arguing with Trump; I'm not Trump btw.